Skip to content

Sub-threshold DRG Stimulation vs Sham in Established Responders

Efficacy of Sub-Threshold Dorsal Root Ganglion (DRG) Stimulation Versus Sham in Established Responders: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Two-Period Crossover Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07170722
Acronym
DRG-SHAM
Enrollment
20
Registered
2025-09-12
Start date
2025-09-01
Completion date
2025-11-30
Last updated
2025-12-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Causalgia, Chronic Pain, Complex Regional Pain Syndromes (CRPS), Low Back Pain, Neuropathic Pain, Pelvic Pain

Keywords

Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation, DRG Stimulation, Sub-threshold Stimulation, Neuromodulation, Sham-controlled Trial, Randomized Controlled Trial, Crossover Trial, Chronic Neuropathic Pain, Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS), Post-surgical Pain, Post-traumatic Pain, Low Back Pain, Chronic Pelvic Pain

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if sub-threshold dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation provides pain relief beyond placebo in adults with chronic neuropathic pain who already have an implanted DRG stimulator. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does sub-threshold DRG stimulation reduce daily pain intensity compared with sham stimulation? * How does sub-threshold stimulation affect sleep, mood, and daily activity? Researchers will compare active sub-threshold DRG stimulation to sham (device switched off) to see if stimulation has a genuine effect on pain and wellbeing. Participants will: * Be randomly assigned to receive either active sub-threshold DRG stimulation or sham stimulation for 5 days, followed by the opposite condition for another 5 days. * Complete short electronic diaries twice daily about their pain, sleep, mood, and activity. * Attend study visits for safety checks and assessments.

Detailed description

Neuropathic pain is a chronic condition that affects 6-10% of adults and is often resistant to conventional drug therapy. The dorsal root ganglion (DRG) has emerged as an important therapeutic target, as abnormal firing in DRG neurons contributes to peripheral and central sensitization. DRG stimulation (DRGS) delivers mild electrical pulses through implanted leads placed near the DRG. Compared with traditional spinal cord stimulation, DRGS provides highly targeted pain relief with fewer unwanted sensations. Over the past decade, DRGS has become an established treatment for conditions such as complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), causalgia, chronic low back pain, and post-surgical neuropathic pain. Modern programming favors sub-threshold settings, in which stimulation is delivered below the level that causes tingling sensations (paresthesias). Although widely adopted, the specific contribution of sub-threshold stimulation has never been confirmed in a sham-controlled trial. This study is the first randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial to directly evaluate whether sub-threshold DRG stimulation provides pain relief beyond placebo. Adults with an implanted DRG stimulator who have shown sustained pain relief will be randomized in a two-period crossover design to receive either active sub-threshold stimulation or sham stimulation, each for 5 days, with a washout period in between. The primary objective is to determine whether sub-threshold DRG stimulation reduces mean daily pain intensity compared with sham. Secondary objectives include assessing sleep quality, mood, daily activity, and safety/tolerability. Exploratory measures include device logs and rescue medication use. The findings of this trial will provide critical evidence on the efficacy of sub-threshold DRG stimulation, helping to inform clinical guidelines, payer decisions, and neuromodulation programming strategies worldwide.

Interventions

DEVICESubtreshhold DRG-S

Continuous electrical stimulation delivered through an implanted DRG neurostimulator. Amplitude is set individually to 80% of each participant's perception threshold, ensuring no paresthesia is produced. Frequency and pulse width remain unchanged from the participant's established therapeutic settings. This sub-threshold programming distinguishes the intervention from suprathreshold (paresthesia-based) DRG stimulation used in earlier studies.

OTHERSham

The implanted DRG stimulator remains switched off for the entire 5-day period. Device interrogation logs are masked to maintain blinding. No electrical stimulation is delivered, allowing a placebo-controlled comparison with active sub-threshold stimulation.

Sponsors

Umeå University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Randomised, double blinded, sham study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults, age 18 years or older * Implanted with a dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulator for chronic neuropathic pain * Have experienced at least 50% reduction in pain for 3 months or longer on standard DRG therapy * Stable pain medication regimen for at least 4 weeks before enrollment * Able and willing to complete electronic diaries and attend study visits

Exclusion criteria

* Active infection or wound complication at the stimulator implant site * Significant psychiatric illness (for example, uncontrolled depression or psychosis) * Planned surgery, device reprogramming, or medication changes during the study period * Currently pregnant or breastfeeding * Occurrence of any adverse event that meets predefined withdrawal criteria during the study (such as intolerable pain or device-related complications)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Average daily pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale, 0-10)Twice daily (morning and evening) from Day 0 through Day 11 (includes both 5-day treatment periods and the two 24-hour washout periods on Day 0 and Day 6).Self-reported pain intensity recorded twice daily (morning and evening) using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable). Daily scores will be averaged across each treatment and washout period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sleep quality (Patient Global Impression of Change, PGIC)Daily in the morning from Day 0 through Day 11.Self-reported sleep quality rated each morning using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale, ranging from 1 = very much worse to 5 = very much improved. Higher scores indicate better sleep.
Mood (Patient Global Impression of Change, PGIC)Daily in the evening from Day 0 through Day 11.Self-reported mood rated each evening using the PGIC scale, ranging from 1 = very much worse to 5 = very much improved. Higher scores indicate better mood.
Daily activity (Patient Global Impression of Change, PGIC)Daily in the evening from Day 0 through Day 11.Self-reported daily activity rated each evening using the PGIC scale, ranging from 1 = very much worse to 5 = very much improved. Higher scores indicate better activity.
Adverse eventsFrom day 0 through end of study (day 11).Number and type of adverse events, documented with onset, severity, relatedness to treatment, and resolution.

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 15, 2026