Skip to content

High Coverage CARotid Stenting vs. Medical Management Alone to Prevent EmboliSm From symptomaTic Non-stenotic cARotid Disease (SyNC)

High Coverage CARotid Stenting vs. Medical Management Alone to Prevent EmboliSm From symptomaTic Non-stenotic cARotid Disease (SyNC) - CARESTAR

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07166731
Acronym
CARESTAR
Enrollment
536
Registered
2025-09-10
Start date
2026-03-01
Completion date
2032-06-01
Last updated
2026-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carotid Artery Disease, Carotid Artery Stenting, Carotid Artery Thrombosis, Carotid Plaque Imaging, Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source, Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis

Keywords

SyNC, Carotid artery disease, carotid artery stenting, symptomatic non-stenotic carotid artery disease, carotid artery stenosis, symptomatic carotid artery stenosis

Brief summary

Goal is to analyse the clinical safety and efficacy of the CARESTO® heal Stent within standard clinical routine for the treatment of patients with symptomatic non-stenotic carotid disease (SyNC) and with high-risk plaque features for stroke recurrence compared to medical treatment alone with respect to the mid- and long-term clinical outcomes.

Detailed description

The purpose of the CARESTAR study is to analyse the clinical safety and efficacy of the CARESTO® heal Stent within standard clinical routine for the treatment of patients with symptomatic non-stenotic carotid disease (SyNC) \<50% and with high-risk plaque features for stroke recurrence compared to the medical treatment group and with respect to the mid- and long-term clinical outcomes. By randomly assigning participants to the two treatment arms, the aim is to generate bias-free and reliable data that can provide information on the optimal treatment approach in this patient group. Despite advances in medical therapy and endovascular treatment, the optimal treatment strategy for low-grade vulnerable plaques remains unclear. There is therefore an urgent need to evaluate the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive procedures such as carotid stenting against medical treatment according to clinical routine in this specific patient group. With CARESTAR, a multicentre, prospective, randomised, parallel-grouped open label and blinded safety endpoint study this gap shall be closed. Given the considerations outlined above, symptomatic non-stenotic carotid disease (SyNC) \<50% with neurological symptoms represents a desperate situation, where all available options for contribution to the improvement of the patient's state of health or to the prevention of secondary diseases should be considered.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Acandis GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke or acute retinal artery ischemia within the last two weeks related to symptomatic non-stenotic carotid disease (SyNC) and high-risk carotid plaque features * Ipsilateral acute ischemic stroke must be determined by acute ischemic infarct on DWI or CT OR * by neurological symptoms indicating ipsilateral cortical deficits consistent with ischemia in the territory of the internal carotid artery and after exclusion of a significant microangiopathy * Acute retinal artery ischemia must be determined by ophthalmologic examination * Patients with no other identifiable cause of stroke, evaluated using standard echocardiographic examinations to exclude cardiogenic or aortogenic sources of embolism * Symptomatic non-stenotic carotid disease defined as one or more plaques in the ipsilateral internal carotid artery causing 10-49% luminal narrowing AND * Presence of high-risk plaque features which must be determined through visual inspection on CTA or MRI (Ultrasound findings alone are insufficient; features must be confirmed by CTA or MRI to meet the criteria): * Identification of at least two of the following characteristics Plaque thickness ≥ 3mm Irregular plaque surface Ulceration \<50% plaque calcification Lipid-rich necrotic core * and/or identification of at least one of the following characteristics Intraplaque haemorrhage * Presence of carotid web characterized as shelf-like/linear, smooth filling defects * Plaque assessment including evaluation of the presence of high-risk features by routine imaging (CTA, MRI) confirmed by an independent CoreLab * Signed Informed Consent Form * Patient ≥ 18 years * mRS ≤ 3 at time of randomisation * Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) according to standard of care before endovascular treatment

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with acute complete occlusion of the carotid artery in an emergency setting * Incidence of acute infarcts in other vascular (i.e., not ipsilateral carotid) territories * Patients in whom the stroke was likely caused by one of the following diseases: * Small vessel disease * Large vessel atherosclerotic disease ≥ 50% * Cardioembolism * Other known disease e.g. vasculitis * Predominantly calcified Plaques (≥50% calcified plaque components on CT-Angio) * Patients presenting with intraluminal carotid thrombus (e.g. characterized by 'donut sign' on CTA) * Patients with highly tortuous vessels (\>90°) which may prevent access or safe insertion of the stent * Patients with post-CEA re-stenosis or post-CAS re-stenosis * Patients with blood coagulation disorders * Patients in whom access to the carotid lesion is impossible or associated with an increased risk of procedural complications * Patients with lesions in the ostium of the common carotid artery * Patients with known hypersensitivity to nickel-titanium * Patients who are allergic to heparin * Any known conditions that affect life expectancy to less than 12 months * Any known conditions associated with an increased risk of endovascular treatment * Patients not able to visit the outpatient clinic for annual follow-up

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary Endpoint as rate of events of ipsilateral recurrent ischemic stroke or ipsilateral retinal artery ischemia analysed as time to first occurenceThrough study completion, an average of 54 monthsIpsilateral recurrent ischemic stroke or ipsilateral retinal artery ischemia during follow-up analysed as time to first occurence

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Secondary Endpoint of Incidence of events and change from functional statusThrough study completion, an average of 54 months* Each of the components of the primary outcome: Rate of Ipsilateral recurrent ischemic stroke or ipsilateral retinal artery ischemia * A composite of rate of ipsilateral recurrent ischemic stroke or ipsilateral retinal artery ischemia during follow-up or any symptomatic stroke, death, or myocardial infarction within 30 ± 10 days after randomisation * A composite of rate of disabling ipsilateral recurrent ischemic stroke or ipsilateral retinal artery ischemia during follow-up or disabling stroke, death, or disabling myocardial infarction within 30 ± 10 days after randomisation, where disabling is defined as any event resulting in a worsening by at least one point on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) (e.g. 0-6) * Rate of any change in functional status from admission to follow-up visits, assessed using the Canadian Outcome Scale for MinOr Stroke (COSMOS), comparing post-stroke functioning at follow-up to the patient's functional status recorded at hospital admission (e.g. 0-6)

Countries

Germany

Contacts

CONTACTAcandis GmbH
info@acandis.com+49 (0) 7231 - 155 00 171

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026