Skip to content

Upper Cervical Mobilization vs. Sub-Occipital MET for Neck Pain and FHP

Upper Cervical Translatoric Mobilization Versus Sub Occipital Muscle Energy Technique in Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain and Forward Head Posture

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07164963
Enrollment
45
Registered
2025-09-10
Start date
2025-09-12
Completion date
2025-12-01
Last updated
2026-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Forward Head Posture, Mechanical Neck Pain

Keywords

Mechanical Neck Pain, Forward Head Posture, Upper Cervical Mobilization, Muscle Energy Technique, Craniovertebral Angle, Neck Disability Index

Brief summary

forty-five patients with MNP and FHP age from 25-40 years will be randomly assigned into three groups: Group A (study): 15patients will receive (upper cervical translatoric mobilization) and traditional physical therapy, Group B (study): 15patients received sub occipital muscle energy technique and traditional physical therapy, and Group C (control): 15 patients will receive the traditional physical therapy treatment only . Interventions will be conducted three times a week for four weeks. Craniovertebral angle (CVA) using Photographic Posture Analysis Method (surgimap software), pain intensity using viual analogue scale (VAS), Cervical ROM using CROM device, and neck functional ability using Neck Disability Index (NDI) will be assessed for all participants before and after the treatment program.

Detailed description

This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the efficacy of Upper Cervical Translatoric Mobilization (UC-TSM) and Sub-Occipital Muscle Energy Technique (MET) in patients with Mechanical Neck Pain (MNP) and Forward Head Posture (FHP). Forty-five participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: Group A (UC-TSM + conventional physical therapy), Group B (Sub-Occipital MET + conventional physical therapy), and Group C (conventional physical therapy only). Interventions will be administered three times per week for four weeks. Outcomes include pain intensity (VAS), neck disability (NDI), cervical range of motion (CROM), and craniovertebral angle (CVA) assessed via photographic analysis (Surgimap). The study will be conducted at Benha University.

Interventions

OTHERupper cervical translatoric mobilisation

(UC-TSM) is defined as a system of manual techniques using straight-line forces delivered in a parallel or perpendicular direction to an individual vertebral joint or motion segment there is also increasing in body of evidence supporting the its clinical effectiveness and safety in the management of patients with cervical impairments.

OTHERsub occipital muscle energy technique

Muscle Energy Technique (MET) is another form of a gentle manual therapy intervention that primarily targets the soft tissues, though it also contributes significantly to joint mobilization. It has been reported that, adding MET to exercise program resulted in better improvement in CVA and FHP than exercise group only

OTHERtraditional physical therapy

hot pack and kendel exercise

Sponsors

MTI University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients aged from 20-60 Years * suffering from M echanical neck pain with Craniovertebral angle ; \< 53 * their NDI ranging from 30-48% \[9\]. Patients were excluded from the study if they have injury or trauma to cervical region, spinal surgery, cervical canal stenosis, radicular pain and malignancy.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients were excluded from the study if they have injury or trauma to cervical region, spinal surgery, cervical canal stenosis, radicular pain and malignancy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain IntensityBaseline and after 4 weeks of treatmentPain intensity will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a 10-cm line where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable. A lower score indicates improvement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain IntensityBaseline and after 4 weeks of treatmentFunctional disability will be assessed using the Neck Disability Index (NDI), a 10-item questionnaire scored from 0 to 50, where higher scores indicate greater disability.
Craniovertebral Angle (CVA) via Photographic Posture Analysisbaseline and after 4 weeksThe craniovertebral angle (CVA) will be measured using lateral-view photography and analyzed using Surgimap software. A higher CVA indicates improvement in forward head posture.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026