Skip to content

Spondylodiscitis: a Retrospective Observational Study.

Spondylodiscitis: a Retrospective Observational Study of the Alessandria University Hospital's Case Series.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07164235
Acronym
SpAl
Enrollment
137
Registered
2025-09-10
Start date
2022-07-05
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2025-09-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spondylodiscitis

Keywords

Spondylodiscitis, infectious processes, 18-FDG, 18 F-FDG-PET/CT

Brief summary

Spondylodiscitis is an infectious process affecting the vertebral bodies, intervertebral discs, and paraspinal tissues, sometimes involving the spinal cord, most often with a bacterial etiology. Instrumental diagnosis relies on CT, however, contrast-enhanced MRI is the most sensitive test for confirming the diagnosis, as abnormalities are usually detected earlier than with CT. More recently, nuclear diagnostics using 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18-FDG) PET has proven very useful both for diagnosis and as a tool for monitoring therapeutic efficacy. Etiological diagnosis relies primarily on blood cultures and, if the former is not possible, diagnostic biopsy. Approximately one-third of patients lack a microbiological isolation, and the inability to implement targeted therapy is a known risk factor for treatment failure. Therapeutic indications are giving way to shorter courses based on the use of oral medications, even though the epidemiology of the countries from which most of the clinical indications and literature originate is profoundly different from that of Italy. An epidemiological analysis of the cases referred to our Center is therefore of primary importance.

Detailed description

Spondylodiscitis is an infectious process affecting the vertebral bodies, intervertebral discs, and paraspinal tissues, sometimes involving the spinal cord. The etiology is most often bacterial, with the main pathogens implicated being Staphylococcus aureus, streptococci, enterobacteriaceae, and other Gram-negative bacilli. Instrumental diagnosis relies on CT, which allows for the detection of lesions such as bony sequestrations and soft tissue abscesses, as well as the exclusion of epidural abscesses. Contrast-enhanced MRI, however, is the most sensitive test for confirming the diagnosis, as abnormalities are usually detected earlier than with CT. More recently, nuclear imaging, particularly 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18-FDG) PET, has proven very useful both for diagnosing tissue with high glucose metabolism and as a tool for monitoring therapeutic efficacy. 18F-FDG-PET/CT has been associated with greater accuracy than MRI in diagnosing early spondylodiscitis in the first 2 weeks after symptom onset. Another important advantage of 18F-FDG-PET/CT over MRI is the potential identification of metastatic infectious foci, especially in patients with bacteremia, allowing for rapid source control. 18F-FDG-PET/CT is also useful for spondylodiscitis caused by mycobacteria, fungi, or Brucella, with some data suggesting different uptake values depending on the etiology. Etiological diagnosis, however, relies primarily on blood cultures, which can be positive in up to 50% of cases of native spondylodiscitis caused by S. aureus. When noninvasive isolation is not possible, a diagnostic biopsy is necessary. Despite the use of invasive techniques, approximately one-third of patients lack microbiological isolation, and the inability to implement targeted therapy is a known risk factor for treatment failure. It also leads to the use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials, with environmental and sometimes economic consequences. Therapeutic indications, until now based on case series and cohort studies dating back more than 40 years, are giving way to shorter courses based on the use of orally administered drugs. However, the epidemiology of the countries from which most of the clinical indications and literature on bone infections originate is profoundly different from that of Italy. Therefore, an epidemiological analysis of the cases referred to our Center is of primary importance.

Interventions

OTHERPatients diagnosed with spondylodiscitis

Patients admitted to the Infectious Diseases Department of the University Hospital of Alessandria between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2024, who were diagnosed with spondylodiscitis

Sponsors

Azienda Ospedaliera SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo di Alessandria
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult male or female subjects aged ≥ 18 years; * Diagnosis of spondylodiscitis confirmed radiologically and microbiologically * Admission to Infectious Diseases Unit between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2024 * Signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Age \<18 years * Lack of signed informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Descriptive analysisBaselineDescription of the characteristics of patients diagnosed with spondylodiscitis admitted to the University Hospital of Alessandria from 2017 to 2024

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pre- and post-pandemic comparison of clinical and management characteristics of patients with spondylodiscitisBaselineComparison of the differences in the characteristics of patients hospitalized before and after 06/03/2020 (pre-pandemic and post-pandemic period)
Comparison of the differences between patients with confirmed and unconfirmed microbiological diagnosisBaselineEvaluate any differences in duration between patients with a confirmed and unconfirmed microbiological diagnosis of spondylodiscitis
Concordance between PET results and antibiotic therapyBaselineEvaluate the concordance between PET results and antibiotic therapy discontinuation in the absence of relapse at 6 months

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026