Skip to content

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Cohort of TCM

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Cohort Studies of Chinese Medicine

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07162870
Enrollment
1000
Registered
2025-09-09
Start date
2025-09-05
Completion date
2028-11-30
Last updated
2025-09-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)

Keywords

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, TCM, Cohort

Brief summary

This study, based on past registration records, evaluates the clinical efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine in treating IPF in the real world, identifies advantageous populations and clinical targets, and provides references for precision traditional Chinese medicine treatment.

Detailed description

This study is based on a previously established registry of interstitial lung disease, with traditional Chinese medicine treatment as the exposure factor. A total of at least 1000 IPF patients will be continuously enrolled and followed up for 2 years; it will further observe the pattern of syndromes, disease characteristics, and their interrelationships during disease development, and evaluate the clinical efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine in treating IPF using indicators such as annual acute exacerbation rate and clinical symptoms. Based on the differences in efficacy indicators, it will identify the advantageous population, clarify the clinical efficacy advantage targets, and provide a basis for precision treatment with traditional Chinese medicine.

Interventions

Regulated use of Chinese medicine treatment protocols is included as an exposure factor. Exposure is defined as taking the medication continuously for more than 3 months per year, or intermittently for more than 6 months per year. According to the standardised use of TCM protocols, the group is divided into an exposed group (TCM cohort) and an unexposed group (non-TCM cohort).

All intervention measures that do not meet the criteria for TCM exposure are regarded as non-TCM exposure.

Sponsors

The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
China-Japan Friendship Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
CollaboratorOTHER
Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China
CollaboratorOTHER
Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients diagnosed with IPF; 2. Age ≥ 40 years old; 3. Voluntary participation in this study,And sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with confusion, dementia, consciousness disorders, and various mental illnesses; 2. Patients who are unable to take care of themselves and have been bedridden for a long time.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Annual acute exacerbation rateUp to week 104The annual acute exacerbation rate will be calculated in each group at the end of the trial.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
All-cause mortality rateUp to week 104.The all-cause mortality rate will be calculated in each group at the end of the trial.
Lung transplantation rateUp to week 104.The lung transplantation will be calculated in each cohort at the end of the trial.
The Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM) SyndromesEvaluate the TCM s]yndromes at baseline and at weeks 13, 26, 39, 52, 65, 78, 91, and 104.Evaluating TCM syndromes by collecting patients' symptoms, signs, tongue and pulse information.
Clinical symptoms and SignsEvaluate the clinical symptoms and signs up at baseline and at weeks 13, 26, 39, 52, 65, 78, 91, and 104.Clinical symptoms and Signs will be evaluated through a scale. The scale includes coughing, expectoration, chest tightness, shortness of breath, wheezin. The Clinical Symptom Rating Scale includes 6 items: cough, expectoration, chest tightness, shortness of breath, wheezing, and cyanosis. Each item has a score of 0-3, totaling 18 points. The higher the score, the worse he patient's condition.
Forced vital capacity (FVC)Evaluate the FVC at baseline and at weeks 26, 52, 78 and 104.FVC will be applied to assess pulmonary function.
FVC as the percentage of the predicted value (FVC%)Evaluate the FVC% at baseline and at weeks 26, 52, 78 and 104.FVC% will be applied to assess pulmonary function.
Diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO)Evaluate the DLCO at baseline and at weeks 26, 52, 78 and 104.DLCO will be applied to assess pulmonary function.
DLCO as the percentage of the predicted value (DLCO%)Evaluate the DLCO% at baseline and at weeks 26, 52, 78 and 104.DLCO% will be applied to assess pulmonary function.
Progression-Free Survival(PFS)Evaluate the PFS at weeks 13, 26, 39, 52, 65, 78, 91, and 104.According to Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis in Adults (Update) and Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis: An Official Clinical Practice Guideline of the ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT : The time from enrollment to the first meeting of disease progression (at least two of respiratory symptoms, physiological evidence and radiological evidence).
The 30 - second sit - to - stand test(30s STS)Evaluate the 30s STS at baseline and at weeks 13, 26, 39, 52, 65, 78, 91, and 104.The 30 second sitting and standing test will be used to evaluate lower limb strenath and cardiopulmonary function.
A Tool to Assess Quality of life (ATAQ-IPF) total scoresEvaluate the ATAQ-IPF total scores at baseline and at weeks 13, 26, 39, 52, 65, 78, 91, and 104.ATAQ-IPF is currently a specialized scale for evaluating the quality of life, consisting of 13 dimensions and 74 items, with each item scoring 1-5 points. The higher the score, the worse the quality of life.
St. George's respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ) total scoresEvaluate the SGRQ total scores at baseline and at weeks 13, 26, 39, 52, 65, 78, 91, and 104.SGRQ is a scale used to evaluate the quality of life of patients, which includes three dimensions: symptoms, mobility, and the impact of disease on daily life, with a total of 50 items. The total score range of SGRQ is usually between 0 and 100, with higher scores leading to poorer quality of life.
DyspneaEvaluate the mMRC total scores at baseline and at weeks 13, 26, 39, 52, 65, 78, 91, and 104.Dyspnea will be assessed by 22.modified Medical Research Council(mMRC) scores. A score of 0-4 will be given according to the degree of immediate dyspnea. A higher score indicates a worse condition.
C-reactive protein (CRP)Evaluate the CRP level at baseline and at weeks 26, 52, 78 and 104.The CRP level will be detected by ELISA technology.
Krebs Von den Lungen-6(KL-6)Evaluate the KL-6 level at baseline and at weeks 26, 52, 78 and 104.The KL-6 level will be detected by ELISA technology.
The pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP)Evaluate the PASP at baseline and at weeks 26, 52, 78 and 104.The PASP will be measured byechocardiogram.
The diameter of the pulmonary arteryEvaluate the diameter of the pulmonary artery at baseline and at weeks 26, 52, 78 and 104.The diameter of the pulmonary artery will be measured byechocardiogram.
6 Six Minute Walk Distance(6MWD)Evaluate the 6MWD at baseline and at weeks 13, 26, 39, 52, 65, 78, 91, and 104.The 6MWD will be applied to evaluate the exercise capacity. The higher values indicate the better exercise capacity.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary Contactxueqing yu, Ph.D
yxqshi@163.com+8613525518843
Backup Contactjiansheng li, Professor

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026