Skip to content

Oxytocin and Human Defensive Responses in a Dynamic Situation

The Modulatory Affect of Oxytocin on Human Defensive Responses During Dynamic Predator-prey Interactions

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07162584
Enrollment
80
Registered
2025-09-09
Start date
2025-09-13
Completion date
2026-01-28
Last updated
2025-10-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy

Keywords

oxytocin, fMRI, escape decisions, dynamic predator-prey interaction, defensive responses

Brief summary

The presnet study is to investigate the effect of intranasal oxytocin (24 IU) treatment on modulating how human responsd to threat in a dynamic situation.

Detailed description

Predator-prey interactions are inherently dynamic, requiring adaptive responses from prey to survive. Altough there is eviedence for oxytocin modulating anxiety and fear responses to threats, it remains unclear whether oxytocin (OT) would modulate how humans respond to threats along the predatory imminence continuum to facilitate escape during such interactions. Our study therefore focuses on this question by combining behavioralmeasures, skin conductance response, and fMRI in a dynamic predator-prey interaction paradigm. In this double-blind, between-subject, placebo-controlled study, participants are instructed to escape by evaluating the relative distance between themselves (i.e., the prey), the predator (slow, medium and high attacking speed) and the refuge. The MRI and Biopac electrophysiological acquisition systems are used in the study to collect subjects' brain activity and skin conductance response. Participants are also asked to rate their confidence and anxiety levels during performing the task. We will aslo examine the resulted patterns of flight initiation distance (FID) and distance to refuge (DTR) when the prey fled from different predators. Scores of questionnaires including Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory-Ⅱ, Autism Spectrum Quotient, Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire, General Risk Propensity Scale are also collected before the experiment.

Interventions

DRUGOxytocin nasal spray

intranasal administration of oxytocin (24 IU)

DRUGPlacebo

intranasal administration of placebo (24 IU)

Sponsors

University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy subjects without past or current psychiatric or neurological disorders

Exclusion criteria

* History of head injury; pregnant, menstruating, taking oral contraceptives; medical or psychiatric illness, * The presence of metal in the body or claustrophobia.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Escape sucess rates when confronting different predators1 hourEscape sucess rates in successfully entering the refuge when confronting the fast, medium and slow predators.
Flight initiation distance1 hourIt is the prey-predator distance when a prey flees from a threat, a key index quantifying escape decisions.
The distance to refuge1 hourThe distance to refuge when a prey flees from a threat.
Brain activity patterns in response to threats along the predatory imminence continuum1 hourBrain activity patterns in response to different predators along the predatory imminence continuum. We will examine these brain response patterns via both the conventional univariate analysis and the machine learning-based multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) approaches. Based on previous studies, the medium predator is a priori used as an anchor for fast and slow predators for a more sensitive measure of brain activity differences and contrasts with the medium predator would be reported in the suplemental files for completeness (if there were significant effects).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Anxiety rating scores1 hourParticioants are asked to rate how anxious they felt during the escape decision-making process.
SCR during task1 hourSkin Conductance Response (SCR) data are recorded in the task during scanning.
Confidence rating scores1 hourParticipants are asked to rate their confidence levels in successfully escaping from the predator before each block.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactKeith M Kendrick, Dr
k.kendrick.uestc@gmail.com86-28-61830811

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026