Skip to content

Comparing Low-Level Laser and Muscle Energy Techniques in Diabetic Frozen Shoulder

Effects of Low Level Laser Therapy Versus Muscle Energy Techniques Among Diabetic Patients With Frozen Shoulder

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07161622
Enrollment
36
Registered
2025-09-08
Start date
2025-10-31
Completion date
2026-02-28
Last updated
2025-09-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Frozen Shoulder

Keywords

Frozen shoulder, Low-Level Laser Therapy, Muscle Energy Technique,, Range of Motion, Diabetes

Brief summary

The current study is to evaluate the comparative effects of low-level laser therapy and muscle energy technique on pain, range of motion, and functional results in diabetic patients with frozen shoulder. This research aims to enhance the existing data on managing diabetes-related musculoskeletal issues by assessing the comparative advantages of various therapies, therefore assisting physicians in choosing appropriate, patient-centred rehabilitation procedures.

Interventions

Participants received LLLT using a gallium-aluminium-arsenide (Ga-Al-As) diode laser device (BTL-5000, UK). The laser operated at a wavelength of 830 nm and a power output of 100 mW. Irradiation was applied at three sites (anterior capsule, posterior capsule, subacromial area) using a stationary-contact technique for 60-90 seconds each, delivering 4 J/cm² per site. Sessions were administered three times weekly for eight weeks. Conventional Therapy (for both groups): 15 minutes of moist heat (Chattanooga Hydrocollator) Pendulum exercises Passive and active-assisted ROM exercises Isometric strengthening of rotator cuff and scapular stabilizers Postural correction training

Participants received MET for major shoulder muscles (internal/external rotators, flexors, extensors). Each contraction was performed at \ 20% of maximum effort, sustained for 10 seconds, followed by 5 seconds relaxation, and then passive stretch to new end range. Three to five cycles per muscle group were performed. Sessions lasted \ 20 minutes, three times weekly for eight weeks. Conventional Therapy (same as Arm A): 15 minutes of moist heat Pendulum exercises Passive and active-assisted ROM exercises Isometric strengthening of rotator cuff and scapular stabilizers Postural correction training

Sponsors

University of Lahore
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Eligible participants were male and female individuals aged 18 to 65 years with a verified diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus and clinical manifestations of frozen shoulder for at least three months. The diagnosis was determined by limited glenohumeral joint mobility, characterised by a decrease of ≥20° in a minimum of three active movements: flexion <144°, abduction <120°, and external rotation <72°. Cases of both unilateral and bilateral nature were incorporated.

Exclusion criteria

* The

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Shoulder functionBaseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after intervention initiation.Measured using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, a validated patient-reported outcome measure assessing disability and symptoms related to upper limb musculoskeletal disorders. Higher scores indicate greater disability.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026