Skip to content

The Influence of the Timing of Postoperative Rehabilitation Intervention on the Clinical Efficacy of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spine System in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation

The Influence of the Timing of Postoperative Rehabilitation Intervention on the Clinical

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07161232
Enrollment
72
Registered
2025-09-08
Start date
2025-03-28
Completion date
2027-03-28
Last updated
2025-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lumbar Disc Herniation, Postoperative Rehabilitation

Brief summary

This study focuses on the impact of the timing of postoperative rehabilitation intervention on the clinical efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic spine surgery in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. The main objective is to explore this impact and provide high-quality evidence-based medical evidence for making reasonable clinical decisions.

Detailed description

This study is a prospective randomized controlled trial on the impact of the timing of postoperative rehabilitation intervention on the clinical efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic spine surgery in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. The main purpose is to explore this impact and provide high-quality evidence-based medical evidence for making reasonable clinical decisions. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria formulated in this study, 72 patients who underwent UBE surgery for lumbar disc herniation were recruited in our hospital and randomly assigned to the early rehabilitation intervention group (referred to as the early rehabilitation group, with rehabilitation intervention starting 2 weeks after surgery) or the late rehabilitation intervention group (referred to as the late rehabilitation group, with rehabilitation intervention starting 6 weeks after surgery) after surgery. The clinical and subjective (questionnaire) data of the subjects before surgery, after surgery and during the follow-up process (up to 12 months after surgery) were collected to compare the differences in clinical efficacy between early and late postoperative rehabilitation intervention in patients with lumbar disc herniation treated by UBE.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALStandardized Postoperative Rehabilitation Protocol

This intervention is a standardized, progressive rehabilitation protocol for patients after lumbar disc herniation surgery, delivered under the guidance of a senior physical therapist. The protocol aims to improve pain, restore function, and prevent complications through core stability exercises and neurodynamic techniques. The exercises are performed once daily and progressed based on patient tolerance. The protocol consists of two phases: Initial Phase ( commencing postoperatively): Includes: 1) Transverse abdominis activation; 2) Sit-to-stand training with abdominal bracing; 3) Four-point kneeling rockbacks for spinal mobility; 4) Neural mobilization techniques (performed in sitting); 5) Neural sliding techniques (performed in sitting). Progressive Phase: Builds upon the initial exercises by increasing the range of motion, adding isometric hold times, and integrating cervical movement with neural techniques to increase difficulty and intensity.

Sponsors

Li Xiang
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged between 19 and 65 years. Diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation by imaging and scheduled for unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) surgery. Presenting with radicular pain in the lower extremity, with a history of less than 1 year. Able to understand Chinese and complete questionnaires independently. Physically capable of participating in exercise rehabilitation. Willing to participate and provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Aged under 18 or over 65 years. Combined with other spinal pathologies (e.g., ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis, spinal tumor, spinal fracture, cauda equina syndrome). Diagnosis of neurological disorders (e.g., multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease). Presence of uncontrolled cardiovascular, respiratory, or peripheral vascular diseases. History of severe psychiatric disorders (e.g., schizophrenia). Previous history of spinal surgery. Pregnancy or lactation. Inability to understand or comply with the study procedures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) ScoreChange from Baseline to 12 months postoperativelyThe Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a widely validated and disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure for assessing functional status in individuals with low back pain. The questionnaire consists of 10 items addressing pain intensity, personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, social life, traveling, and employment/homemaking. Each item is scored from 0 to 5, and the total score is converted to a percentage (0-100%), with higher scores indicating greater disability. The ODI score at 12 months postoperatively will be used as the primary endpoint to evaluate the long-term effect of rehabilitation timing.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026