Skip to content

The Relationship Between Sensory Profile and Ankle Muscle Shortness in Children With Autism

The Relationship Between Sensory Profile and Ankle Muscle Shortness in Children With Autism

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07159113
Enrollment
27
Registered
2025-09-08
Start date
2025-10-30
Completion date
2026-06-25
Last updated
2025-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Autism

Brief summary

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between sensory profile and ankle muscle shortness in children with autism. This study will feature only one group consisting of children with autism Childhood autism assessment scale will be completed with the families of the children included in the study. The tip-toe walking status of the children participating in the study will be observed and classified according to the tip-toe walking classification. The ankle muscle shortness of the children will be evaluated by Gastro-Soleus shortness measurements and sensory processing skills will be evaluated by Sensory profile. Muscle shortness measurements and sensory profile results will be compared.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Abant Izzet Baysal University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 10 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Being diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder in the Special Needs Report for Children (ÇÖZGER) * GMFCS level I,II or III * Between the ages of 4-10 * Volunteering to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Having a rigid contracture in passive knee extension and ankle range of motion * History of surgery or botox affecting ankle joint range of motion in the last 6 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sensory ProfileOne yearThis test is used to assess how children aged 3-10 years process information from their body and environment. It is a five-point Likert-type parent questionnaire and consists of 125 items. It is explained to the caregiver that he/she should check the box that best describes how often the child performs the behaviors given in the questionnaire and answer for all parameters; if he/she cannot answer because there is a behavior that he/she cannot observe at all or that he/she thinks does not fit the child, he/she should put an X on that question. The end of each section is scored according always 1, frequently 2, occasionally 3, rarely 4, never 5. The scores obtained from each parameter are calculated according to the Dunn Sensory Profile Score Explanation and the child is classified according to the categories of 'definite difference', 'probable difference', 'typical performance' from each section.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Childhood Autism Rating ScaleOne yearIt is a scale consisting of 15 items used to assess the severity of autism, with each item scored between 1 and 4. A score of 1 represents that the child's behavior for that item is normal for his/her age, while a score of 4 represents that it is extremely abnormal. The minimum score is 15 and the maximum score is 60. The results are evaluated as no autism between 15-29 points, mild-moderate autism between 30-36 points, and extreme autism between 37-60 points. Families of the children were asked to fill out the froms.
M.Gastrocnemius - M.Gastrosoleus Shortness MeasurementOne yearPassive foot dorsiflexion measurement with a manual goniometer was performed at 0 degrees knee flexion for Gastrocnemius muscle and 90 degrees knee flexion for Soleus muscle. Muscle shortness was expressed in degrees. Ankle neutral position was recorded as 0 degrees, dorsiflexion angles as positive and plantar flexion angles as negative.
Classification of Tiptoe WalkingOne yearTiptoe walking was assessed and classified by observation during 10-meter walk-run. Level 1 indicates that there is tiptoe behavior during running, walking and standing; Level 2 indicates that there is tiptoe behavior during running and walking; Level 3 indicates that there is tiptoe behavior only during running; if no tiptoe walking is observed, it was indicated as no tiptoe walking.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

Primary ContactSeda Ayaz Taş, Phd
seda.ayaztas@ibu.edu.tr+905495458040

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026