Skip to content

The Safety and Efficacy for In-segment Late Lumen Loss of the 'Genoss® SCB' Versus 'SeQuent® Please NEO' in Patients With Coronary ISR

A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Pivotal Clinical Trial to Compare the Safety and Efficacy for In-segment Late Lumen Loss of the 'Genoss® SCB' Versus 'SeQuent® Please NEO' in Patients With Coronary ISR

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07159087
Enrollment
94
Registered
2025-09-08
Start date
2025-02-19
Completion date
2027-01-31
Last updated
2025-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Arterial Disease (CAD)

Keywords

In-stent Restenosis

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Genoss® SCB by comparing in-segment late lumen loss (LLL) to the control group (SeQuent® Please NEO) at 6 months in patients with coronary stent-in-stent restenosis (ISR) with a reference vessel diameter of 2.0-4.0 mm.

Detailed description

This pivotal study is a randomized controlled trial to compare with the control group (SeQuent® Please NEO), and will recruit 94 patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) from 9 institutions. The test group (Genoss® SCB) and the control group (SeQuent® Please NEO) will be randomly assigned 1:1, and all patients will be followed up at 1, 6, and 12 months after the procedure. The primary endpoint is to evaluate in-segment late lumen loss by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) by an independent assessor at 6 months after the procedure.

Interventions

DEVICESirolimus Coated PTCA Balloon Catheter(Genoss® SCB)

Drug Coated Balloon

Sponsors

Synex Consulting Ltd
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Genoss Co., Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ≥ 19 years of age * Patients with in-stent restenosis who are candidates for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) * In cases corresponding to one of the following conditions: non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), stable angina, unstable angina, or silent myocardial ischemia * Women of childbearing potential\* must agree to use at least one medically acceptable method of contraception\*\* throughout the duration of the clinical trial * Subjects who voluntarily agree to participate and provide written informed consent * Subjects who are willing to comply with the requirements of the clinical trial protocol * Subjects who develop in-stent restenosis (ISR) ≥ 90 days after the index coronary stent implantation, with the restenosis classified as Mehran type I to III * Subjects with a maximum of two ISR lesions, with visually estimated significant coronary artery stenosis on quantitative coronary angiography analysis (QCA) meeting one of the following criteria: 1. In asymptomatic patients: in-segment percent diameter stenosis (DS%) \> 70% compared to the reference vessel diameter of the target vessel\* (\*Target vessel: the vessel containing the target lesion with the minimum lumen diameter.) 2. In patients with angina symptoms or evidence of ischemia on non-invasive functional testing: DS% \> 50% * On QCA, the ISR lesion(s) to be treated must have a lesion length \< 36 mm and the reference vessel diameter (RVD) of the target coronary artery must be between 2.0 mm and 4.0 mm.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients diagnosed with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) by electrocardiogram. * Known hypersensitivity or contraindications at screening to any of the following drugs or substances: Aspirin, Heparin, Clopidogrel, Prasugrel, Ticagrelor, Sirolimus, Paclitaxel, Delivery matrix (e.g., shellac, vitamin E-TPGS), Ticlopidine, Contrast agents (e.g., Iopromide) Note: Subjects with contrast media sensitivity may be enrolled if the reaction is manageable with steroids and pheniramine; however, those with a known anaphylactic reaction are excluded. * Subjects who are scheduled for or require surgery within 1 year of the index procedure that would necessitate discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy. * Subjects with bleeding disorders, gastrointestinal ulcers, or any conditions that may increase the risk of bleeding, in which anticoagulation is contraindicated or limited. * Subjects with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \< 30% as assessed by echocardiography. * Severe renal failure (Creatinine \> 2.0 mg/dL) that makes QCA inappropriate. * Subjects with cardiogenic shock. * Pregnant or breastfeeding women: Women of childbearing potential with a positive urine hCG (or serum β-hCG) test are excluded. * Subjects with an estimated life expectancy of less than 1 year due to comorbid conditions. * Subjects with medical conditions such as significant psychiatric disorders that may interfere with trial participation or outcomes. * Subjects who, in the investigator's opinion, are inappropriate for this clinical trial or for whom participation poses increased risk. * Participation in another clinical trial currently or within 90 days prior to screening. * Any other condition deemed ethically or clinically inappropriate by the investigator to participate in the study: Specific reasons should be recorded in the Case Report Form (CRF). \[

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
In-segment late lumen loss after procedureat 6 months after procedureIn-segment refers to a portion including within 5 mm of each of the distal and proximal portions at the boundary of the inserted stent. Therefore, in-segment late lumen loss (LLL) is defined as the difference (mm) in the minimum lumen diameter (MLD) within the segment at 6 months from baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Target Lesion Failure (TLF), %at 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after procedureTarget lesion failure is defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (TV-MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR).
Patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE), %at 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after procedurePOCE is defined as a composite of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction (MI), any revasularization or stroke.
Device success rate, %Immediately after the procedureDevice success rate is defined as successful delivery of the device to the target lesion during the procedure, normal inflation, deflation, and catheter withdrawal of the without balloon rupture.
Procedural success rate, %up to 24 hoursThe definition of procedural success includes the of device success, freedom adverse events in-hospital \[cardiovascular death, target lesion revascularization, peri-procedural myocardial infarction, any stroke, and BARC 3-5 bleeding\], and freedom from bail-out stenting.
Binary restenosis rate, %at 6 months after procduredefined as a in-segment diameter stenosis ≥ 50% at angiographic follow-up
Cardiac Death, %at 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after procedureDeath caused by acute MI, Sudden cardiac, including unwitnessed, death, Death resulting from heart failure, Death caused by stroke, Death caused by cardiovascular procedures, Death resulting from cardiovascular haemorrhage (haemorrhage deriving from cardiac and/or vascular disease/injuries)
All-cause death, %at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months after procedureIncidence rate of all-cause death including cardiac death.
Target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), %at 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after procedureIncidence rate of target vessel myocardial infarction
In-stent late lumen loss after procedureat 6 months after procedureIn-stent refers to a portion between each of the distal and proximal portions. Therefore, in-stent late lumen loss (LLL) is defined as the difference (mm) in the minimum lumen diameter (MLD) within the segment at 6 months from baseline. This is assessed by an independent evaluator using quantitative coronary angiography analysis (QCA) imaging.
Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR), %at 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after procedureTarget lesion revascularization is defined as a repeat percutaneous intervention of the target lesion or bypass surgery of the target vessel performed for restenosis or other complication of the target lesion.
Ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (ID-TVR), %at 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after procedureTarget vessel revascularization is defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention or surgical bypass of any segment of the target vessel.
Revascularization, %at 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after procedureRevascularizations are defined according to the vessel/lesion treated and are identified as target or non-target, based on the initial site of the treatment.
Stent thrombosisat 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after procedureStent thrombosis will be assessed and classified according to the definitions established by the Academic Research Consortium-2 (ARC-2). Stent thrombus is classified based on how the diagnosis is confirmed. These classifications include definite, and probable stent thrombosis. Definite stent thrombosis Requires confirmation of stent thrombosis on angiography. Probable stent thrombosis Consider if there is active ischemia on electrocardiogram (EKG) or stress in the distribution of prior stent and absence of significant coronary lesion on angiography. Timing may be divided between acute, subacute, early, and late. When classified as early, or late: Early stent thrombosis occurs within one month of initial placement. Late stent thrombosis occurs between 1 and 12 months of initial placement. Early stent thrombosis is divided between acute or subacute: Acute thrombosis occurs within 24 hours of initial placement. Subacute thrombosis occurs between 24 hours to one month of initial place
Stroke, %at 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after procedureNeuro-ARC definitions (according to ARC-2 criteria)
Major bleeding BARC type III to V, %at 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after procedureMajor bleeding according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) scale includes BARC types 3 to 5. Type 3 bleeding encompasses significant bleeding, including overt bleeding with a hemoglobin drop, intracranial hemorrhage, and bleeding requiring surgery or vasoactive agents. Type 4 refers to bleeding related to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Type 5 bleeding is fatal, either probable or definite. BARC Type 3: Significant Bleeding 3a: Overt bleeding plus a hemoglobin drop of 3-5 g/dL. 3b: Overt bleeding plus a hemoglobin drop of 3-5 g/dL, cardiac tamponade, surgical intervention required, or intravenous vasoactive agents used. 3c: Intracranial hemorrhage. BARC Type 5: Fatal Bleeding 5a: Probable fatal bleeding, no definitive cause of death but clinically suspected. 5b: Definite fatal bleeding, confirmed by imaging or autopsy.
Abrupt closure/ Sub abrupt closure, %at 1 months after procedure① Abrupt closure: Defined as a newly developed, significant reduction in blood flow within the target vessel (TIMI grade 0 or 1) that persists and requires an unplanned rescue strategy (including emergency surgery). This must be associated with mechanical dissection of the treated or manipulated vessel, coronary thrombosis, or severe spasm. ② Sub-abrupt closure: Defined as abrupt closure occurring after the index procedure (after the patient has left the procedure room) but before Visit 3 (4 weeks post-procedure).
Myocardial infarction (MI), %at 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after procedureIncidence rate of all myocardial infarction

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026