Skip to content

Clareon PanOptix Versus AcrySof PanOptix : Prospective Study Comparing Contrast Sensitivity

Clareon PanOptix Versus AcrySof PanOptix : Prospective Study Comparing Contrast Sensitivity. Study of Two Different Material of Intra Ocular Multifocal Lenses Aiming to Compare the Effect on Contrast Sensitivity.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07158177
Acronym
CLAYRE
Enrollment
40
Registered
2025-09-05
Start date
2025-10-01
Completion date
2026-10-15
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cataract and IOL Surgery

Keywords

Multifocal Intra Ocular Lens, Presbyopia Correcting Intra Ocular Lens (PCIOL)., Cataract

Brief summary

Retrospective, comparative, interventional, randomized, single-center study, contralateral (the patient's 2 eyes will be implanted: 1 CPO and the other APO) Patients presenting for cataract surgery with a request for presbyopia correction and managed as part of routine clinical practice. The main aim of the study is to demonstrate that contrast sensitivity is better with the Clareon PanOptix (CPO) intraocular lens (IOL) compared with the AcrySof PanOptix (APO) IOL 3 months after implantation.

Detailed description

Visit at Day3-10: usual follow-up visit, no additional examinations as part of the clinical investigation. Visit at 1 month: usual follow-up visit, no additional examinations as part of the clinical investigation. 3-month visit (end of clinical investigation): usual follow-up visit, plus contrast vision test and non-invasive aberrometry test (I-Trace) as part of the clinical investigation. Regarding a cataract surgery with a request for presbyopia, the protocol evaluate two differents devices (IOL intraocular lens).

Interventions

DEVICEAcrysof™ PanOptix™ toric or not, trifocal IOL CE marked, Alcon company.

both of the patient's eyes will be implanted: 1 CPO and the other APO

both of the patient's eyes will be implanted: 1 CPO and the other APO

Sponsors

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER
Alcon Research
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients ≥ 18 years of age * Patients presenting for cataract surgery in routine clinical practice and eligible for multifocal IOL implantation (toric and non-toric) * Patients with grade 2/3 cataract density and comparable visual acuity in both eyes * Patient with a pregnancy test (negative pregnancy test), if applicable * Patient with signed consent to participate in the study * Patient affiliated to a social security scheme or entitled beneficiary

Exclusion criteria

* Children \< 18 years of age * Pregnancy or breast-feeding in progress or planned during the study. * History of anterior (cornea, anterior chamber, sulcus) or posterior (uveal, vitreoretinal) segment pathology, including retinal vascular occlusive disease, retinal detachment or peripheral retinal laser photocoagulation, AMD, glaucoma. * Any inflammation of the anterior or posterior segment, whatever the etiology, and/or history of any disease with intraocular inflammatory repercussions. * Clinically significant corneal pathology (epithelial, stromal and/or endothelial) that could have an impact on visual results. * Clinically significant moderate or severe dry eye that could affect study measurements. * History of intraocular or corneal surgery (refractive or trauma-related). * Presence or history of amblyopia or monofixation syndrome. * Subjects with conditions that increase the risk of zonular disruption during the phacoemulsification procedure that may affect the centration or postoperative orientation of the IOL. * Any other planned eye surgery, including, but not limited to, limbal relaxing incision (LRI)/astigmatic keratotomy and laser refractive surgery (LASIK). * Irregular astigmatism identified by corneal topography * Patients under guardianship, curatorship or safeguard of justice, as well as pregnant or breast-feeding women (article L1121-5 of the CSP).1.1 * Patient under AME

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Contrast sensitivity measured at 3 months3 monthsAULCSF (Area under the log contrast sensitivity function) at different spatial frequencies (1,5 ; 3 ; 6 ; 12 cycles par degré (cpd)) in monocular vision and under mesopic condition without glare.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Contrast sensitivity measured at 3 months3 monthsAULCSF monocular in photopic condition with and without glareat 3 months.
Uncorrected and corrected Visual acuity (UCVA and CVA) or in monocular and binocular vision at different distances (4 meters for Distance- 66 centimeters of intermediate- 40 cm for Near)3 monthsUDVA, UIVA, UNVA, BCDVA, DCIVA, DCNVA
Refractive stability1 and 3 monthsComparison of refractive error between 1 and 3 months
OSI : Objective Scatter Index: monocular3 monthsComparison of refractive error between 1 and 3 months
Glistenings3 monthsUsing Miyata scale

Countries

France

Contacts

CONTACTDominique MONNET, MD, PhD
dominique.monnet@aphp.fr01 58 41 22 01
CONTACTValérie PLENCE, MSc
valerie.plence-fauroux@aphp.fr
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORDominique MONNET, MD, PhD

Université Paris Cité, Faculté de Santé / UFR de médecine

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 31, 2026