Skip to content

Testing if PDR-001 Can Safely and Effectively Remove Harmful Brain Protein in Parkinson's Disease

A Study on the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of PDR-001 Injection for Bilateral Stereotactic Subthalamic Nucleus (STN) Clearance of α-synuclein

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07157345
Enrollment
12
Registered
2025-09-05
Start date
2025-10-20
Completion date
2029-12-31
Last updated
2025-09-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease (PD)

Keywords

PDR-001, Parkinson disease

Brief summary

Parkinson's disease (PD) poses a severe threat to human health, and its incidence is rising year by year. Current therapeutic options are limited by significant shortcomings. Pathological aggregation of α-synuclein and the consequent death of dopaminergic neurons are the primary drivers of PD pathogenesis. While siRNA-mediated knockdown of α-synuclein can offer some protection to dopaminergic neurons, its clinical utility is hampered by low cellular uptake, off-target effects, and transient activity. These drawbacks underscore the urgent need for novel strategies that can efficiently and specifically degrade α-synuclein to delay or even halt PD progression. Our prior work identified tat-βsyn-deg (PDR-001), a three-segment peptide that selectively targets α-synuclein. When packaged into AAV9 capsids and delivered via bilateral stereotaxic injection into the subthalamic nucleus, this peptide effectively reduces α-synuclein within the target region. Pre-clinical studies in both human-α-synuclein-expressing mice and non-human primate models of PD have demonstrated robust α-synuclein clearance and marked improvements in motor deficits (see Research Foundation). The present project will advance PDR-001 into first-in-human studies to evaluate safety and explore preliminary efficacy. Unlike conventional symptomatic therapies, this approach targets the root cause of PD, setting the stage for disease-modifying treatment. Successful translation would establish a new therapeutic paradigm capable of slowing or preventing PD progression.

Interventions

DRUGPDR001

This drug was packaged into AAV9 capsids and delivered via bilateral stereotaxic injection into the subthalamic nucleus

Sponsors

Ruijin Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

To be eligible for inclusion in this clinical study, all of the following criteria must be met: 1. Clinically confirmed diagnosis of primary PD (in accordance with the 2016 Chinese Diagnostic Criteria for Parkinson's Disease or the 2015 MDS Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for primary PD); 2. Age 40-65 years (inclusive) at screening, either sex; 3. Disease duration ≤ 5 years; 4. Hoehn & Yahr stage ≤ 2 in the off state.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PDR-001 treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v5.0From enrollment to the end of treatment at 52 weeksCTCAE 5.0 records the severity of adverse events, which is divided into grades 1 to 5
Titer levels of capsid neutralizing antibodies and binding antibodies against recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) in serumFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 52 weeksRecord the titer changes before and after treatment
Titer of rAAV vectors in whole bloodFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 52 weeksRecord the titer changes before and after treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment efficacy will be evaluated using the Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 52 weeksThis scale has a total score range of 0 to 260, with higher scores indicating more severe motor and non-motor symptoms (worse outcome). Changes in scores before and after treatment will be recorded.
Treatment efficacy will be evaluated using the Patient Global Impression - Improvement scale (PGI-I)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 52 weeksThis is a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), with lower scores indicating greater improvement (better outcome). Changes in scores before and after treatment will be recorded.
Treatment efficacy will be evaluated using the Clinical Global Impression - Improvement scale (CGI-I)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 52 weeksThis is a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), with lower scores indicating greater clinical improvement (better outcome). Changes in scores before and after treatment will be recorded.
Change in anxiety symptoms as measured by the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 52 weeksThe Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) is a clinician-administered scale with scores ranging from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate greater severity of anxiety symptoms. Treatment efficacy will be evaluated by the change in HAM-A total score from baseline to 52 weeks
Change in sleep-related problems as measured by the Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale-2 (PDSS-2)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 52 weeksPDSS-2 is a 15-item questionnaire. The total score ranges from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating worse sleep-related problems. Treatment efficacy will be evaluated by the changes in PDSS-2 from baseline to 52 weeks
Treatment efficacy will be evaluated using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D, 17-item version)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 52 weeksThe total score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms (worse outcome). Changes in scores before and after treatment will be recorded.
Treatment efficacy will be evaluated using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 52 weeksThe total score ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function (better outcome). Changes in scores before and after treatment will be recorded.
Evaluation of the use of antiparkinsonian drugs will be assessed using the Levodopa Equivalent Daily Dose (LEDD)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 52 weeksThe total daily dose of antiparkinsonian medication (converted to LEDD, mg/day) will be calculated and compared before and after treatment. A decrease in LEDD indicates reduced drug burden (better outcome), while an increase indicates greater drug requirement (worse outcome).

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactYi Zhang
zy12893@rjh.com.cn64370045

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026