Skip to content

Asymmetrical High Flow Oxygen Versus Noninvasive Ventilation in Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure

Asymmetrical High Flow Oxygen Versus Noninvasive Ventilation in Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07157098
Acronym
HIFOLD2
Enrollment
24
Registered
2025-09-05
Start date
2025-08-25
Completion date
2026-07-31
Last updated
2025-09-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure

Keywords

acute hypercapnic respiratory failure, non-invasive ventilation, high-flow oxygen

Brief summary

NIV is a life-saving treatment for people with breathing failure and carbon dioxide (CO2) retention. It helps remove this waste gas from the lungs and reduces the effort needed to breathe. However, the standard masks used for NIV can become uncomfortable over time, which may lead patients to stop using them. Stopping treatment can be dangerous and may cause breathing problems to worsen. That's why finding devices that are more comfortable and possibly more effective is very important. This study aims to take a first step in that direction. This is the first study comparing new devices designed to help people with chronic CO2 buildup during breathing flare-ups. Devices tested include a new type of asymmetrical nasal cannula for high-flow oxygen therapy and a new mask called OptiNIV, which has a comfortable design that may help remove more CO2. These devices will be compared to standard NIV masks currently used in hospitals. Outcome of interests include their effects on the effort needed to breathe, on how much CO2 is cleared, and on how comfortable they are.

Interventions

DEVICEasymmetrical high-flow nasal cannula

high-flow nasal oxygen therapy via asymmetrical nasal prongs

DEVICEnon-invasive ventilation with standard mask

non-invasive ventilation with standard oronasal mask, clinically used in the participting site

DEVICEnon-invasive ventilation with a new mask

non-invasive ventilation with a new mask design, with under-nose, bridge-free design

Sponsors

Unity Health Toronto
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Patients will go through three intervention steps, each with a different breathing support: asymmetrical high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), non-invasive ventilation (NIV) using the standard NIV mask at the participating center, and NIV using a new mask design. Each step lasts 10 minutes.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosed with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure * Admitted to the intensive care unit * Being treated with either high-flow oxygen treatment or non-invasive ventilation

Exclusion criteria

* Clinical instability - defined as the presence of one of the followings: respiratory rate \> 40 breaths/minute, SpO2 \< 80%, active broncho-pleural fistula, Glasgow Coma Scale \< 8, mean arterial pressure below 60 mmHg despite usage of vasopressors * Requiring immediate need of endotracheal intubation, according to the judgement of the attending physician * Contraindications of monitoring with electrical impedance tomography (e.g. pacemaker, chest wall burns wounds limiting electrode placement).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Power of BreathingMinute 10, 20, and 30A marker of the patient's work of breathing. Calculated by thickening fraction of the diaphragm, multiplied by the respiratory rate.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ventilatory RatioMinute 10, 20, and 30A marker of ventilation efficiency. Calculated from carbon dioxide level (in this case, obtained from transcutaneous capnography) and minute ventilation (in this case, obtained from electrical impedance tomography)
Patient's comfortMinute 10, 20, and 30Obtained from a visual analog scale from 1 to 10, with 10 indicating the highest comfort
Patient's subjective shortness of breathMinute 10, 20, and 30Obtained from a visual analog scale from 1 to 10, with 10 indicating the worst shortness of breath

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactNattapat Wongtirawit, M.D.
nattapat.wongtirawit@unityhealth.to416-864-6060

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026