Skip to content

Professional Training Programs Targeting Attendance in Fitness Centers

Impact of Two Short Behavioral Theory-Driven Professional Training Programs Targeting Attendance in Fitness Centers

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07156240
Enrollment
117
Registered
2025-09-05
Start date
2025-09-03
Completion date
2026-09-01
Last updated
2026-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Exercise Frequency

Keywords

exercise, affect, motivation, adherence, frequency

Brief summary

Over recent decades, leading theories of human behavior have been applied across various physical activity (PA) settings, yielding mixed results. While they have provided some valuable insights, they have largely failed to achieve one central aim - to help foster sustained, population-wide increases in PA (Albarracín et al., 2024; Ekkekakis & Zenko, 2016; Pratt et al., 2020; Rhodes et al., 2019). This gap has prompted concern, as these theories, despite some support for their assumptions, have not translated into meaningful and lasting behavior change. Some have criticized them for their overarching dependency on the decisional balance one may perform given the right set of conditions (e.g., supportive social environments; benefits vs. barriers dyad; self-efficacy appraisal) (Conn et al., 2011; Ekkekakis, 2017; Rhodes et al., 2019); others have pointed to an astonishing lack of experimental efforts testing the expression of those theoretical assumptions (Ekkekakis et al., 2019; Manninen et al., 2022; Ntoumanis & Moller, 2025), leaving researchers, policymakers and stakeholders (and the theories) hostage to cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence. Either way, new approaches and experimental efforts to address the challenge of supporting PA practices are warranted and urgent. Three of the most studied motivational theories in PA contexts over the last decades are the Theory of Planned Behavior (Ajzen, 1991), Self-Determination Theory (Deci & Ryan, 1985), and the Transtheoretical Model (Prochaska & DiClemente, 1984) (Ntoumanis et al., 2018; Simpson et al., 2025). Without minimizing their usefulness and robust body of evidence, they fall into the category of theories that have struggled, to date, to demonstrate moderate or large effects in programs aiming to improve exercise-related behavior based on their assumptions. Naturally, the complexity of each theory or model brings several challenges that undermine the extent to which we can confidently attribute any limited effect observed in an experimental study solely to the theory's inability to express its assumptions. As such, despite decades of research grounded in several (conceptually) well-established behavioral theories, there remains a need to test their assumptions through experimental approaches and, complementarily - or if necessary, alternatively - to explore new avenues for inquiry and theoretical development (Simpson et al., 2025). To this end, the present study will address this issue experimentally using two theoretical approaches. The first approach is grounded in a well-established theory of human motivation, Self-Determination Theory (SDT), which offers numerous recommendations for its potential application, particularly in promoting positive impacts on exercise adherence. The second approach is structured in alignment with the general principles of hedonic theory, a recently revitalized approach to the understanding of Human behavior, focusing on the promotion of pleasurable responses during exercise.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALExperimental I (SDT)

SDT-based course aiming to inmprove professionals operational interpersonal qualities

BEHAVIORALExperimental II (Hedonic)

Hedonic-based course aiming to inmprove professionals operational interpersonal qualities

OTHERControl group

FITT-VP bases course aiming to improve exercise prescription

Sponsors

Grupo Lusófona
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Professionals \- All exercise professionals in the three clubs Exercisers * \> 18 years old * All exercisers enrolled in the three clubs * A subsample of the first 174 voluntaries participating in the study and enrolled in the three clubs after September 1st

Exclusion criteria

* Expulsion of the clubs due to internal rules violation or other decision independent of this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Club attendanceCollected on the last day of each month, and averaged after a one-year period (September 1st to August 31st)Club attendance during a one-year period collected with the turstile digital system

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Attrition rateNumber of total cancellations or dropouts for each month, collected through the turstile digital record and club payment system, summed throughout 12 monthsAttrition rate calculated through the number of cancellations or dropouts / total number of new members × 100 in a one-year period
Exercise habit measured with the Self-reported behavioral automaticity index (SRBAI) - BaselineBaseline; after club enrollment, in the first two weeks of September 2025, at any given timeAutomaticity for exercise practice measured with the Self-reported behavioral automaticity index (SRBAI)
Exercise habit measured with the Self-reported behavioral automaticity index (SRBAI) - 6 monthsAfter 6 months of enrollment; first two weeks of February, at any given timeAutomaticity for exercise practice measured with the Self-reported behavioral automaticity index (SRBAI)
Exercise habit measured with the Self-reported behavioral automaticity index (SRBAI) - 12 monthsAfter 12 months, during the last week of August 2026, at any given timeAutomaticity for exercise practice measured with the Self-reported behavioral automaticity index (SRBAI)
Initial behavioral intention to continue exercising; the intention to exercise questionnaire - BaselineBaseline; after club enrollment, in the first two weeks of September 2025, at any given timeBehavioral intention as defined by the theory of planned behavior with the intention to exercise questionnaire
Behavioral intention to continue exercising; the intention to exercise questionnaire - 6 monthsAfter 6 months of enrollment; first two weeks of February, at any given timeBehavioral intention as defined by the theory of planned behavior with the intention to exercise questionnaire
Behavioral intention to continue exercising; the intention to exercise questionnaire - 12 monthsAfter 12 months, during the last week of August 2026, at any given timeBehavioral intention as defined by the theory of planned behavior with the intention to exercise questionnaire
Exerciser basic psychological needs satisfaction and frustration; the BPNSFS questionnaire - BaselineBaseline; after club enrollment, in the first two weeks of September 2025, at any given timeBasic psychological needs satisfaction and frustration as defined by the Self-Determination Theory
Exerciser basic psychological needs satisfaction and frustration; the BPNSFS questionnaire - 6 monthsAfter 6 months of enrollment; firts two weeks of February, at any given timeBasic psychological needs satisfaction and frustration as defined by the Self-Determination Theory
Exerciser basic psychological needs satisfaction and frustration; the BPNSFS questionnaire - 12 monthsAfter 12 months, during the last week of August 2026, at any given timeBasic psychological needs satisfaction and frustration as defined by the Self-Determination Theory
Exerciser behavioral regulation; the BREQ-4 questionnaire - BaselineBaseline; after club enrollment, in the first two weeks of September 2025, at any given timeExercise behavioral regulations as defined by the Self-Determination Theory
Exerciser behavioral regulation; the BREQ-4 questionnaire - 6 monthsAfter 6 months of enrollment; firts two weeks of February, at any given timeExercise behavioral regulations as defined by the Self-Determination Theory
Exerciser behavioral regulation; the BREQ-4 questionnaire - 12 monthsAfter 12 months, during the last week of August 2026, at any given timeExercise behavioral regulations as defined by the Self-Determination Theory
Exercise enjoyment measured with the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) - BaselineBaseline; after club enrollment, in the first two weeks of September 2025, at any given timeExercise enjoyment measured with the the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES)
Exercise enjoyment measured with the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) - 6 monthsAfter 6 months of enrollment; firts two weeks of February, at any given timeExercise enjoyment measured with the the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES)
Exercise enjoyment measured with the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) - 12 monthsAfter 12 months, during the last week of August 2026, at any given timeExercise enjoyment measured with the the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES)
Subjective exercise experience - BaselineBaseline; after club enrollment, in the first two weeks of September 2025, at any given timeThe attraction-antipathy and the pleasure-displeasure assessed with the affective exercise experiences questionnaire (AFFEXX)
Subjective exercise experience - 6 monthsAfter 6 months of enrollment; firts two weeks of February, at any given timeThe attraction-antipathy and the pleasure-displeasure assessed with the affective exercise experiences questionnaire (AFFEXX)
Subjective exercise experience - 12 monthsAfter 12 months, during the last week of August 2026, at any given timeThe attraction-antipathy and the pleasure-displeasure assessed with the affective exercise experiences questionnaire (AFFEXX)

Countries

Portugal

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORDiogo S. Teixeira, PhD

Lusófona University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026