Exercise Frequency
Conditions
Keywords
exercise, affect, motivation, adherence, frequency
Brief summary
Over recent decades, leading theories of human behavior have been applied across various physical activity (PA) settings, yielding mixed results. While they have provided some valuable insights, they have largely failed to achieve one central aim - to help foster sustained, population-wide increases in PA (Albarracín et al., 2024; Ekkekakis & Zenko, 2016; Pratt et al., 2020; Rhodes et al., 2019). This gap has prompted concern, as these theories, despite some support for their assumptions, have not translated into meaningful and lasting behavior change. Some have criticized them for their overarching dependency on the decisional balance one may perform given the right set of conditions (e.g., supportive social environments; benefits vs. barriers dyad; self-efficacy appraisal) (Conn et al., 2011; Ekkekakis, 2017; Rhodes et al., 2019); others have pointed to an astonishing lack of experimental efforts testing the expression of those theoretical assumptions (Ekkekakis et al., 2019; Manninen et al., 2022; Ntoumanis & Moller, 2025), leaving researchers, policymakers and stakeholders (and the theories) hostage to cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence. Either way, new approaches and experimental efforts to address the challenge of supporting PA practices are warranted and urgent. Three of the most studied motivational theories in PA contexts over the last decades are the Theory of Planned Behavior (Ajzen, 1991), Self-Determination Theory (Deci & Ryan, 1985), and the Transtheoretical Model (Prochaska & DiClemente, 1984) (Ntoumanis et al., 2018; Simpson et al., 2025). Without minimizing their usefulness and robust body of evidence, they fall into the category of theories that have struggled, to date, to demonstrate moderate or large effects in programs aiming to improve exercise-related behavior based on their assumptions. Naturally, the complexity of each theory or model brings several challenges that undermine the extent to which we can confidently attribute any limited effect observed in an experimental study solely to the theory's inability to express its assumptions. As such, despite decades of research grounded in several (conceptually) well-established behavioral theories, there remains a need to test their assumptions through experimental approaches and, complementarily - or if necessary, alternatively - to explore new avenues for inquiry and theoretical development (Simpson et al., 2025). To this end, the present study will address this issue experimentally using two theoretical approaches. The first approach is grounded in a well-established theory of human motivation, Self-Determination Theory (SDT), which offers numerous recommendations for its potential application, particularly in promoting positive impacts on exercise adherence. The second approach is structured in alignment with the general principles of hedonic theory, a recently revitalized approach to the understanding of Human behavior, focusing on the promotion of pleasurable responses during exercise.
Interventions
SDT-based course aiming to inmprove professionals operational interpersonal qualities
Hedonic-based course aiming to inmprove professionals operational interpersonal qualities
FITT-VP bases course aiming to improve exercise prescription
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Professionals \- All exercise professionals in the three clubs Exercisers * \> 18 years old * All exercisers enrolled in the three clubs * A subsample of the first 174 voluntaries participating in the study and enrolled in the three clubs after September 1st
Exclusion criteria
* Expulsion of the clubs due to internal rules violation or other decision independent of this study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Club attendance | Collected on the last day of each month, and averaged after a one-year period (September 1st to August 31st) | Club attendance during a one-year period collected with the turstile digital system |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Attrition rate | Number of total cancellations or dropouts for each month, collected through the turstile digital record and club payment system, summed throughout 12 months | Attrition rate calculated through the number of cancellations or dropouts / total number of new members × 100 in a one-year period |
| Exercise habit measured with the Self-reported behavioral automaticity index (SRBAI) - Baseline | Baseline; after club enrollment, in the first two weeks of September 2025, at any given time | Automaticity for exercise practice measured with the Self-reported behavioral automaticity index (SRBAI) |
| Exercise habit measured with the Self-reported behavioral automaticity index (SRBAI) - 6 months | After 6 months of enrollment; first two weeks of February, at any given time | Automaticity for exercise practice measured with the Self-reported behavioral automaticity index (SRBAI) |
| Exercise habit measured with the Self-reported behavioral automaticity index (SRBAI) - 12 months | After 12 months, during the last week of August 2026, at any given time | Automaticity for exercise practice measured with the Self-reported behavioral automaticity index (SRBAI) |
| Initial behavioral intention to continue exercising; the intention to exercise questionnaire - Baseline | Baseline; after club enrollment, in the first two weeks of September 2025, at any given time | Behavioral intention as defined by the theory of planned behavior with the intention to exercise questionnaire |
| Behavioral intention to continue exercising; the intention to exercise questionnaire - 6 months | After 6 months of enrollment; first two weeks of February, at any given time | Behavioral intention as defined by the theory of planned behavior with the intention to exercise questionnaire |
| Behavioral intention to continue exercising; the intention to exercise questionnaire - 12 months | After 12 months, during the last week of August 2026, at any given time | Behavioral intention as defined by the theory of planned behavior with the intention to exercise questionnaire |
| Exerciser basic psychological needs satisfaction and frustration; the BPNSFS questionnaire - Baseline | Baseline; after club enrollment, in the first two weeks of September 2025, at any given time | Basic psychological needs satisfaction and frustration as defined by the Self-Determination Theory |
| Exerciser basic psychological needs satisfaction and frustration; the BPNSFS questionnaire - 6 months | After 6 months of enrollment; firts two weeks of February, at any given time | Basic psychological needs satisfaction and frustration as defined by the Self-Determination Theory |
| Exerciser basic psychological needs satisfaction and frustration; the BPNSFS questionnaire - 12 months | After 12 months, during the last week of August 2026, at any given time | Basic psychological needs satisfaction and frustration as defined by the Self-Determination Theory |
| Exerciser behavioral regulation; the BREQ-4 questionnaire - Baseline | Baseline; after club enrollment, in the first two weeks of September 2025, at any given time | Exercise behavioral regulations as defined by the Self-Determination Theory |
| Exerciser behavioral regulation; the BREQ-4 questionnaire - 6 months | After 6 months of enrollment; firts two weeks of February, at any given time | Exercise behavioral regulations as defined by the Self-Determination Theory |
| Exerciser behavioral regulation; the BREQ-4 questionnaire - 12 months | After 12 months, during the last week of August 2026, at any given time | Exercise behavioral regulations as defined by the Self-Determination Theory |
| Exercise enjoyment measured with the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) - Baseline | Baseline; after club enrollment, in the first two weeks of September 2025, at any given time | Exercise enjoyment measured with the the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) |
| Exercise enjoyment measured with the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) - 6 months | After 6 months of enrollment; firts two weeks of February, at any given time | Exercise enjoyment measured with the the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) |
| Exercise enjoyment measured with the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) - 12 months | After 12 months, during the last week of August 2026, at any given time | Exercise enjoyment measured with the the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) |
| Subjective exercise experience - Baseline | Baseline; after club enrollment, in the first two weeks of September 2025, at any given time | The attraction-antipathy and the pleasure-displeasure assessed with the affective exercise experiences questionnaire (AFFEXX) |
| Subjective exercise experience - 6 months | After 6 months of enrollment; firts two weeks of February, at any given time | The attraction-antipathy and the pleasure-displeasure assessed with the affective exercise experiences questionnaire (AFFEXX) |
| Subjective exercise experience - 12 months | After 12 months, during the last week of August 2026, at any given time | The attraction-antipathy and the pleasure-displeasure assessed with the affective exercise experiences questionnaire (AFFEXX) |
Countries
Portugal
Contacts
Lusófona University