Skip to content

Effectiveness of Taste vs. Health-Based Messaging to Improve Diet Quality

Comparing the Effectiveness of Taste vs. Health-Based Messaging Using Nutrition Education Videos on Increasing Herb and Spice Use to Improve Diet Quality

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07156162
Enrollment
514
Registered
2025-09-05
Start date
2025-12-11
Completion date
2026-01-05
Last updated
2026-04-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Behavior, Health

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of taste vs. health messaging using nutrition education videos. The investigators aim to compare and test 2 taste-based messaging vs. 2 health-based messaging that translate previous findings of how spices can improve diet quality. These objectives will be pursued via the following hypothesis: Hypothesis 1: Are taste messaging videos more effective in improving consumer interest, knowledge, and confidence in using herbs and spices compared to health messaging focused videos? Hypothesis 2: Will consumers rate the taste messaging videos higher for liking, engagement, and acceptability of herbs and spices compared to health messaging focused videos?

Detailed description

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: the first group (n\ 200) will view two taste messaging focused videos emphasizing taste and flavor first followed by the two health messaging focused videos. The second group (n\ 200) will receive the two health messaging focused videos emphasizing the importance of using herbs to improve health first followed by the two taste messaging focused videos. Randomization will occur using R and the randomization feature will be embedded in the survey. Both groups will have access to the same educational content but the time of viewing the messaging video will differ according to the taste or health focused arm. Participants will complete screening questions first, and if eligible, an online consent form. Participants will also complete an evaluation questionnaire after watching the taste messaging focused videos and after watching the health messaging focused videos. After participants have completed those questionnaires, they will be provided with a list of measures on why they liked a video and will be able to select if they preferred one over the other, as well as their feedback on the videos, and a demographics questionnaire. Investigators will use participants responses for analysis. All participants will complete the survey questions online using their own device.

Interventions

OTHERVideos: Taste vs Health

Participants in this intervention will watch taste and health focused messaging videos to determine which version is better suited to improve herb and spice usage to improve diet quality in American adults.

OTHERHealth vs. Taste

Participants in this intervention will watch health and taste focused messaging videos to determine which version is better suited to improve herb and spice usage to improve diet quality in American adults.

Sponsors

Penn State University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adults, 18-75 years of age * Reside in the United States * Fluent in English * Able to cook at home at least 2x/week or more

Exclusion criteria

* Outside of the 18-75 year age range * Resides outside the United States * Are not fluent in English * Unable to cook at home at least 2x/week

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Evaluation questionnaire for the taste videos and the health videos using a visual analog scale from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree".Right after watching the second set of nutrition education videos.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 10, 2026