Skip to content

High Dimensional Computing Gesture Recognition

High Dimensional Computing Gesture Recognition

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07155460
Acronym
HDC-GCog
Enrollment
10
Registered
2025-09-04
Start date
2026-01-15
Completion date
2026-06-01
Last updated
2026-01-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy Volunteers

Keywords

Surface ElectroMyoGraphy (sEMG), K-Nearest Neighbor classification algorithm (KNN), Nearest Centroids classification algorithm (NC), Random Forest classification algorithm (RF), Stochastic Gradient Descent classification algorithm (SGD), High Dimensional Computing (HDC)

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is the Improvement of gesture recognition and classification accuracy through the use of the HDC algorithm compared to other classification methods (KNN, RF, SGD, NC). The recognition rate will be expressed by the sensitivity and specificity of gesture recognition. The model will be trained on a portion of the dataset and tested on the remaining part to avoid any bias. The secondaries objectives are the : * Improvement of gesture recognition accuracy with our HDC algorithm compared to other standard models. * Calculation of gesture recognition rates depending on the number of electrodes used and their position. * Subject's assessment of device comfort rated above 6 on a 10-level visual analog scale. * Subject's assessment of ease of performing the gesture rated above 6 on a 10-level visual analog scale.

Detailed description

This project aims to work on gesture recognition based on surface electromyography (EMG) recorded on the forearm. The CEA is currently developing a learning algorithm based on hyperdimensional computing designed to improve the accuracy and latency of gesture recognition. Unlike conventional computing methods, the developed approach relies on (pseudo) random hypervectors. This brings significant advantages: a simple algorithm with a well-defined set of arithmetic operations, extremely robust to noise and errors, with fast, one-pass learning that could ultimately benefit from a memory-centric architecture with a high degree of parallelism. This research could lead to multiple applications, such as video gaming or the metaverse, but also strongly interests the healthcare field, for example in robotic prostheses, tele-surgery applications, or simply medical training using virtual reality applications.

Interventions

DEVICEHDC-GCog

Surface electromyography records

Sponsors

University Hospital, Grenoble
Lead SponsorOTHER
Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique (CEA) Grenoble
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
CLINATEC
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The Primary Purpose of this clinical trial is to test a prototype device for feasibility and not health outcomes.This study is conducted to confirm the design and operating specifications of a device before beginning a full clinical trial.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy, right-handed volunteer subject, * Male or female, * Age between 18 and 65 years inclusive, * BMI \< 30 kg/m², * Minimum forearm circumference less than 15 cm, * Subjects agree to shaving or trimming of the right forearm. * Agreement to the study non-opposition form, * Subject affiliated with a social security scheme, * Registered in the national database of individuals who participate in biomedical research

Exclusion criteria

* Subject with a known motor problem in the right forearm and hand, * Known allergy or intolerance to one of the electrode components, * Presence of a lesion in the measurement area, * Subject with an active medical implant (e.g. pacemaker, cochlear implant, etc.), * Subject wearing a contraceptive implant in the measurement area. * Female subject aware of pregnancy at the time of measurement, * Subject refusing to shave or trim the area or whose body hair precludes shaving or trimming the area, * Presence of a pathology likely to alter the EMG. * Persons referred to in Articles L1121-5 to L1121-8 of the Public Health Code (corresponds to all protected persons: pregnant women, women in labour, breastfeeding mothers, persons deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative decision, persons receiving psychiatric care under Articles L. 3212-1 and L. 3213-1 who do not fall under the provisions of Article L. 1121-8, persons admitted to a health or social establishment for purposes other than research, minors, persons subject to a legal protection measure or unable to express their consent).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gesture recognition rate using a device composed of 32 high-frequency surface EMG electrodes3 hoursCalculation of gesture recognition rate expressed in percentage of gesture recognition

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Real-time gesture recognition (latency <100ms)3 hoursMeasurement of the improved gesture recognition rate with our HDC algorithm compared to other common models
Validation of the positioning and number of electrodes used for EMG acquisition in order to maximize gesture recognition rates3 hoursCalculation of gesture recognition rates based on the number of electrodes used and their position
Analysis of the subject's feedback regarding the ease of performing the gestures (in the form of a questionnaire)3 hoursSubject's rating of device comfort as greater than 6 on a 10-point visual analogue scale

Countries

France

Contacts

CONTACTDaniel ANGLADE, MD, PhD
danglade@chu-grenoble.fr04 38 78 17 46
CONTACTCaroline SANDRE-BALLESTER, PhD
csandreballester@chu-grenoble.fr04 38 78 28 51

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026