Skip to content

Micro-Osteoperforations to Accelerate Maxillary Canine Retraction in Class I Malocclusion

Effectiveness of Micro-Osteoperforations (MOPs) in Accelerating Maxillary Canine Retraction in Angle Class I Malocclusion: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07155018
Acronym
MOPs
Enrollment
40
Registered
2025-09-04
Start date
2025-01-01
Completion date
2025-06-30
Last updated
2025-09-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malocclusion, Angle Class I

Brief summary

This single-blinded, split-mouth randomized controlled trial investigates whether micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) can accelerate maxillary canine retraction in orthodontic patients requiring bilateral premolar extraction. The study also evaluates postoperative pain levels using the Visual Analog Scale at 1, 3, and 7 days.

Detailed description

MOPs are a flapless, minimally invasive surgical technique that stimulates bone remodeling and may reduce orthodontic treatment time. In this trial, one side of each patient receives MOPs while the contralateral side serves as control. Canine retraction is performed using miniscrews, power arms, and NiTi coil springs. Outcomes include the rate of canine movement over 16 weeks and pain assessment using VAS.

Interventions

Maxillary canine retraction with miniscrew anchorage and NiTi closed-coil springs, without micro-osteoperforations.

Maxillary canine retraction with miniscrew anchorage and NiTi closed-coil springs, without micro-osteoperforations

Sponsors

Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Only the outcome assessor was blinded to the intervention allocation. Patients and treating clinicians were aware of the intervention side, but the examiner performing digital measurements and statistical analysis did not know which side received MOPs.

Intervention model description

This is a single-blinded, split-mouth randomized controlled trial. Each participant received both interventions: on one side of the maxillary arch, micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) were performed distal to the canine, while the contralateral side served as the control with conventional retraction. Outcomes were measured within the same patient, reducing inter-individual variability.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 25 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age 16-25 years * Patients requiring bilateral extraction of maxillary first premolars as part of orthodontic treatment * Angle Class I molar relationship * No previous orthodontic treatment

Exclusion criteria

* History of craniofacial trauma or congenital anomalies * Systemic or bone-related diseases * Current smoking * Use of medications affecting bone metabolism

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of Maxillary Canine RetractionBaseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeksDistance of maxillary canine retraction measured on 3D digital dental models using intraoral scanning.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Level (VAS Score)Day 1, Day 3, Day 7 after interventionatient-reported pain intensity measured using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), with scores ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).

Countries

Vietnam

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026