Skip to content

Oral vs IV Sedation for Cataract Surgery in Older Adults

Cataract Oral vs IV Sedation Pilot RCT: A Non-inferiority Assessment of Perioperative Safety and Cognitive Recovery in Older Adults

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07154147
Acronym
CatNAPS-2
Enrollment
20
Registered
2025-09-04
Start date
2025-08-12
Completion date
2026-01-19
Last updated
2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cataract Surgery, Cognition Function, Older Adults, Perioperative Care, Sedation

Keywords

oral sedation, intravenous sedation, alprazolam, midazolam, cataract surgery, older adults, cognitive recovery, postoperative recovery, patient satisfaction, non-inferiority trial, pilot study, randomized controlled trial, anesthesia

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the feasibility of comparing oral sedation (a pill) with intravenous (IV) sedation for cataract surgery in older adults. Investigators will assess the feasibility, completeness, and distribution of data related to postoperative recovery, including thinking and memory, as well as participant satisfaction with care. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either oral sedation with an IV placebo or IV sedation with an oral placebo before cataract surgery. Participants will complete brief surveys assessing recovery before and after surgery and will be contacted by phone after surgery to assess postoperative recovery. Results from this pilot study will inform the design of a future, fully powered trial evaluating sedation approaches for cataract surgery.

Detailed description

This pilot clinical trial is designed to assess the feasibility of comparing two commonly used approaches to sedation during cataract surgery in older adults: oral sedation and intravenous (IV) sedation. Cataract surgery is a brief and commonly performed procedure that typically uses topical anesthetic eye drops, with sedation provided to promote comfort and relaxation. In the United States, IV sedation is frequently used and requires anesthesiology support and monitoring, whereas oral sedation is more commonly used in other settings because it is simpler to administer and less resource-intensive. The primary focus of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, completeness, and distribution of data collection related to postoperative cognitive recovery using validated assessment tools. Secondary aims include descriptive assessments of participant satisfaction, surgeon satisfaction, recruitment success, participant retention, adherence to the assigned sedation intervention, intervention fidelity, intraoperative events, and postoperative anesthesia-related complications. This pilot study will enroll 20 adults aged 65 years and older who are scheduled to undergo cataract surgery. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either oral alprazolam with an IV placebo or a placebo pill with standard IV sedation using midazolam. All participants will receive topical ocular anesthesia and standard intraoperative monitoring by an anesthesia team. Cognitive recovery and other recovery outcomes will be assessed before surgery and during the postoperative period up to seven days after surgery. Findings from this study will be used to inform the design and implementation of a future, larger randomized trial.

Interventions

DRUGAlprazolam

Participants will take oral alprazolam 0.5 mg 15 to 90 minutes before surgery to promote relaxation and reduce anxiety. An IV placebo (normal saline) will be administered to maintain blinding.

DRUGMidazolam

Participants will receive IV midazolam 1 mg immediately before surgery to promote relaxation and reduce anxiety. An oral placebo pill will be used to maintain blinding.

Sponsors

University of California, San Francisco
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

This is a double-blinded study. Participants, care providers (including surgeons and anesthesia teams), outcome assessors, and investigators will all be blinded to group assignment. Pharmacy staff managing randomization will not be blinded.

Intervention model description

Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either oral sedation with IV placebo or IV sedation with oral placebo for cataract surgery.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. ≥ 65 years old 2. Capable of providing informed consent and completing the study procedures in English 3. Able to provide consent for oneself 4. Able to follow directions 5. Able to climb one flight of stairs without stopping to rest 6. Have a new diagnosis of cataract disease 7. Plan on having cataract surgery on their eye within the next 6 months

Exclusion criteria

1. History of prior cataract surgery 2. Admission to the hospital within the past 30 days 3. Difficulty being sedated during other minor outpatient procedures or imaging studies 4. Allergy or resistance to local anesthetic agents 5. Cannot lay flat without having symptoms (i.e., difficulty breathing, severe back pain, etc.) 6. History of severe anxiety requiring routine use of benzodiazepines 7. Patient undergoing cataract surgery in combination with any other ophthalmologic procedure 8. Patient requiring general anesthesia during cataract surgery due to the underlying characteristics of the existing cataract and/or anticipated complexity of the planned procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility and completeness of cognitive recovery assessment using the Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale (PQRS)Before surgery; immediately after surgery; post-operative day 1; post-operative day 7Feasibility, completeness, and distribution of cognitive recovery data will be assessed using the cognitive domain of the Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale (PQRS), a validated questionnaire assessing recovery across multiple health domains. Feasibility outcomes include the proportion of participants with assessable PQRS cognitive data at each time point and the distribution of recovered versus not recovered classifications. Cognitive recovery is defined by meeting pre-specified criteria for return to baseline cognitive function compared to pre-surgery testing. The PQRS cognitive domain does not generate a numeric score; recovery is categorized as "recovered" or "not recovered." These outcomes are descriptive and intended to inform the feasibility of measurement in a future fully powered trial.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participant satisfaction with sedation experience using the Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale (ISAS)Immediately after surgery; post-operative day 1; post-operative day 7Participants will complete the ISAS to rate satisfaction with their anesthesia experience, including feelings of relaxation, comfort, and recall of surgery. The Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale (ISAS) ranges from -3 to +3, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction
Surgeon Satisfaction with Intraoperative ConditionsImmediately after surgeryMeasured via post-surgery surgeon questionnaire assessing perceived ease of surgery, patient cooperation, and need for additional sedation. The Surgeon Intraoperative Satisfaction Questionnaire uses a 6-point Likert scale (1-6), where 1 indicates very poor surgical conditions and 6 indicates excellent surgical conditions. Higher scores indicate better intraoperative conditions
Feasibility of RecruitmentThroughout enrollment periodProportion of eligible participants who agree to participate in the trial
Participant Retention After InterventionUp to 7 days post-surgeryProportion of enrolled participants who complete all postoperative follow-up assessments
Adherence to Sedation InterventionDay of surgeryProportion of participants who receive their assigned intervention without protocol deviation (defined as receiving the intended oral or IV sedative)
Intervention FidelityDay of surgeryProportion of cases where study procedures were delivered as intended, including timing of medication administration and adherence to blinding protocol
Intraoperative EventsDuring surgeryIncidence of intraoperative events recorded descriptively, including participant complaints of pain or discomfort, anxiety or nervousness, requests for additional IV medication, undesirable patient movement, surgeon complaints regarding sedation adequacy, and conversion to general anesthesia.
Incidence of Postoperative Anesthesia-Related ComplicationsUp to 7 days after surgeryIncidence of postoperative anesthesia-related adverse events recorded descriptively, including delirium, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, falls, and unplanned healthcare utilization within 7 days after surgery.
Quality of Recovery Post-Surgery (non-cognitive domains)Post-operative days 1 and 7Quality of recovery will be assessed descriptively using the physical comfort and emotional well-being domains of the Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale (PQRS), excluding the cognitive domain, compared to baseline. The PQRS does not generate numeric scores; recovery is categorized as "recovered" or "not recovered," with no minimum or maximum values.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORCatherine L Chen, MD, MPH

University of California, San Francisco

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 28, 2026