Skip to content

Clinical Efficacy and Mechanism of tDCS for Dysphagia in PD

Clinical Efficacy and Mechanism of tDCS for Dysphagia in Patients With Parkinson's Disease

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07153692
Enrollment
58
Registered
2025-09-04
Start date
2025-07-17
Completion date
2030-03-31
Last updated
2025-09-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dysphagia, Parkinson's Disease and Parkinsonism

Keywords

Parkinson's disease, Atypical Parkinsonian Syndromes, dysphagia, tDCS, VFSS

Brief summary

This study aims to verify transcranial direct current stimulation(tDCS) efficacy for Parkinson's disease (PD)-related dysphagia and its mechanism. Subjects are randomly split into two groups: control (sham tDCS + conventional dysphagia treatment) and experimental (real tDCS + conventional treatment). Assessments will be conducted at baseline, after the completion of intervention, and at the 3-month follow-up. Swallowing function will be evaluated via gold-standard videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) and scales. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) or functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) will be measures for tracking changes in abnormal brain regions/networks. Correlations between swallowing recovery and brain function changes, plus group imaging differences, will reveal tDCS's neurophysiological mechanism.

Detailed description

This study aims to verify the efficacy of tDCS in treating dysphagia in PD and explore its mechanism. Subjects are randomly divided into two groups: the control group receives sham tDCS as well as the conventional dysphagia treatment, while the experimental group undergoes real tDCS combined with conventional dysphagia treatment. All subjects will be evaluated before treatment, after treatment, and 3 months later (follow-up). Swallowing function in both groups will be assessed using the gold standard VFSS and swallowing scales. Additionally, techniques including amplitude of low frequency fluctuation (ALFF) and functional connectivity (FC) in rs-fMRI or fNIRS will be used to observe changes in abnormal brain regions and brain network connectivity before and after treatment in both groups. This study will also explore the correlation between swallowing function recovery and the alteration of brain function, compare the imaging differences between the two groups, and thereby reveal the neurophysiological mechanism underlying tDCS in the treatment of PD-related dysphagia.

Interventions

DEVICEtDCS

The IS200 intelligent electrical stimulator, manufactured in Chengdu, Sichuan, will be used. The electrode pads are 4cm × 6cm in size. The anode of the electrode pad will be placed on the swallowing sensorimotor cortex (S1/M1). The specific positioning will follow the international 10-20 electroencephalographic system: the left S1/M1 area is located at the midpoint of the line connecting C3 and T3 in the left hemisphere; the right S1/M1 area is located at the midpoint of the line connecting C4 and T4 in the right hemisphere. The cathode will be placed on the contralateral supraorbital margin. The S1/M1 areas of the left and right hemispheres will be stimulated alternately, with a current intensity of 1.6mA. The treatment will be given once daily, 20 minutes per session, 5 times a week, for 2 consecutive weeks, totaling 10 sessions (5 sessions for each hemisphere).

1. Training for perioral muscles, tongue sensory and motor functions, including ice cotton swab stimulation, gustatory stimulation, tongue muscle movement training, etc.; 2. Airway protection training, including Mendelsohn maneuver, supraglottic swallow training, etc.;

DEVICEsham tDCS

According to previous literature, the electrode positions and treatment frequency of sham tDCS will be the same as those of real tDCS. The current will be adjusted to 0.05mA.

Sponsors

Wang Ping
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Meet the Chinese Diagnostic Criteria for Parkinson's Disease (2016) or MDS Diagnostic Criteria for Multiple System Atrophy or Progressive Supranuclear Palsy; * VFSS examination indicates dysphagia; * Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score \>23; * Willing to cooperate with the study and sign the informed consent form;

Exclusion criteria

* Comorbid with other diseases that cause dysphagia; * Comorbid with pneumonia, or severe cardiac/renal insufficiency; * Having metal implants in the body * With cognitive impairment or inability to cooperate.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pyriform sinuses residueat baseline, after the completion of 10 days of intervention, at the 3-month follow-upThe residue amount was rated on a scale from 0 to 3: 0 indicates that no residue was visible, 1 indicates mild residue(the level of contrasted material constituted less than 25% of the height of the structure), 2 indicates moderate residue (the level of contrasted material constituted between 25 and 50%of the height of the structure), and 3 indicates severe residue(the level was higher than 50% of the height of the structure).
Rosenbek Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS):at baseline, after the completion of 10 days of intervention, at the 3-month follow-upScored 1-8, with higher scores indicating poorer swallowing safety. 1. Level 1: The bolus does not enter the airway; it remains entirely within the oral cavity or pharynx and is propelled normally. 2. Level 2: The bolus enters the supraglottic area (e.g., vallecula) but does not touch the vocal cords, and is completely cleared (e.g., via swallowing or coughing). 3. Level 3: The bolus enters the supraglottic area without touching the vocal cords, but residue remains (not fully cleared). 4. Level 4: The bolus touches the vocal cords but does not enter the subglottic airway, and is completely cleared. 5. Level 5: The bolus touches the vocal cords without entering the subglottic airway, but residue remains. 6. Level 6: The bolus enters the subglottic airway (into the trachea) but is completely cleared by the patient (e.g., via coughing). 7. Level 7: The bolus enters the subglottic airway; the patient exhibits protective responses (e.g., coughing) but cannot fully clear it, leaving
Videofluoroscopic Dysphagia Scale (VDS)at baseline, after the completion of 10 days of intervention, at the 3-month follow-up14 items in total, including 7 items for oral-phase swallowing function and 7 for pharyngeal-phase function, used to assess overall swallowing function;
oral residueat baseline, after the completion of 10 days of intervention, at the 3-month follow-upPost-swallow residue was scored 0-3, with higher scores indicating more food residue and lower swallowing efficiency
Amplitude of Low Frequency Fluctuation (ALFF)at baseline, after the completion of 10 days of intervention, at the 3-month follow-upALFF focuses on the low-frequency components of these HbO/HbR time series. It is defined as the average amplitude of hemodynamic signal fluctuations within a specific low-frequency range (typically 0.01-0.1 Hz, though the exact band may vary by study). This range is chosen because it captures slow, spontaneous oscillations in cerebral blood flow and oxygenation, which are hypothesized to reflect synchronized neural activity across brain regions (e.g., default mode network, sensorimotor networks). Mathematically, ALFF quantifies the strength of these low-frequency oscillations: a higher ALFF value indicates more prominent or intense fluctuations in the target frequency band, suggesting greater spontaneous hemodynamic (and thus neural) activity in that brain region.
Functional Connectivity (FC)at baseline, after the completion of 10 days of intervention, at the 3-month follow-upFunctional Connectivity (FC) refers to the statistical association or synchronization between spontaneous hemodynamic signals from different cortical regions, reflecting the coordinated activity of spatially distinct brain areas. It quantifies how closely the neural activity (inferred from blood oxygenation changes) in one brain region correlates with that in another, providing insights into the integration of brain networks.
vellaculae residueat baseline, after the completion of 10 days of intervention, at the 3-month follow-upThe residue amount was rated on a scale from 0 to 3: 0 indicates that no residue was visible, 1 indicates mild residue(the level of contrasted material constituted less than 25% of the height of the structure), 2 indicates moderate residue (the level of contrasted material constituted between 25 and 50%of the height of the structure), and 3 indicates severe residue(the level was higher than 50% of the height of the structure).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
temporal indicatorsat baseline, after the completion of 10 days of intervention, at the 3-month follow-upTT, PTT, LVCrt, and so on.
spatial indicatorsat baseline, after the completion of 10 days of intervention, at the 3-month follow-uphyoid bone advancement, hyoid bone elevation, PCR
Swallowing Disorder Questionnaire (SDQ)at baseline, after the completion of 10 days of intervention, at the 3-month follow-upA swallowing function screening scale with 15 items, scored up to 44.5; higher scores indicate more severe dysphagia.
Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS)at baseline, after the completion of 10 days of intervention, at the 3-month follow-up7 levels in total, with Level 1 indicating the most severe feeding impairment and Level 7 indicating normal function.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Swallowing Quality of Life Questionnaire (SWAL-QOL)at baseline, after the completion of 10 days of intervention, at the 3-month follow-upThe SWAL-QOL is a patient-reported outcome tool designed to assess the impact of oropharyngeal dysphagia on health-related quality of life. It Comprises 44 items. it evaluates both subjective experiences (e.g., psychological burden) and clinical symptoms (e.g., choking, food sticking) through self-reported responses.
Non-Motor Symptoms Scale (NMSS) for Parkinson's Diseaseat baseline, after the completion of 10 days of intervention, at the 3-month follow-up30 items, scored up to 210; higher scores indicate more severe non-motor symptoms.
Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-III (UPDRS-III)at baseline, after the completion of 10 days of intervention, at the 3-month follow-up14 items, scored up to 56; higher scores indicate more severe motor dysfunction.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactPing Wang, MS
wangping6288@zju.edu.cn15158113194
Backup ContactBo Wang, MD
wangke1121@zju.edu.cn

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026