Skip to content

Task-oriented Exercises and Mirror Therapy After Flexor Tendon Repair

Impact of Task-oriented Exercises and Mirror Therapy on Hand Functions Post Flexor Tendon Repair

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07152548
Enrollment
66
Registered
2025-09-03
Start date
2025-09-15
Completion date
2026-09-15
Last updated
2025-09-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Flexor Tendon Injury

Brief summary

The main objective of the study is to explore the effect of intervention with task-oriented exercises and mirror therapy on the outcomes of hand function post flexor tendon repair.

Interventions

OTHERTask-oriented exercises and mirror therapy

Patients in this group will receive task-oriented exercises 3 sessions per week for 6 weeks.Therapy will include the following functional tasks: reaching, grasping or holding, lifting, placing objects, and counting fingers.Mirror therapy group: 3 sessions per week for 6 weeks.A mirror will be placed on the learning table, and exercises will be carried out by the patient looking into the mirror, where an unaffected limb would be placed in front of the mirror. Through looking into the mirror, the patient will assume the reflection of the unaffected limb is the affected limb. Exercises will be performed by hand opening and closing, wrist extension and flexion, squeezing, opposition, calculation, and finger flexion and extension.

OTHERTask-oriented exercises

Patients in this group received task-oriented exercises 3 sessions per week for 6 weeks.Therapy included the following functional tasks: reaching, grasping or holding, lifting, placing objects, and counting fingers.

OTHERMirror Therapy

Mirror therapy group 3sessions per week for 6 weeks. Mirror will be placed on the learning table and exercises will be carried out by the patient looking into the mirror where an unaffected limb would be placed in front of the mirror, through looking into the mirror patient will assume the reflection of the unaffected limb as the affected limb. Exercises will be performed hand opening and closing, wrist extension and flexion, squeezing, opposition, the calculation, finger flexion and extension.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

- Ages of patients will range from 18 to 45 years. - All patients were working individuals before injury. - All patients will undergo zones of flexor tendon primary direct repair technique. - All patients will be referred by a surgeon before starting the study procedure. - All patients will enter the study having their informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

- Patients with associated vascular injuries requiring arterial repair. - Patients with associated soft tissue loss. - Patients with associated nerve injuries or bone fractures. - Patients with preexisting problems limiting joint motion. - Patients with tendon injuries in both hands. - Patients with diminished cognitive capacity. - Patients with a history of previously failed repair.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ROM of wrist joints, proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint and distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint of the involved digits of the involved hand for each patient.pre- and post-6 weeks of treatmentThe standard values for AROM movements in the wrist and hand are: Wrist flexion: 80°-90° Wrist extension: 70°-90° Finger flexion: MCP: 85°-90° PIP: 100°-115° DIP: 80°-90° MCP extension: 30°-45°

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the Arabic version of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnairepre- and post-6 weeks of treatmentThe Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) is an example of a self-reporting outcome measure commonly used for the assessment of hand injuries. The MHQ was developed in 1998 and has become a very essential tool for the measurement of health status domains, activities of daily living, overall hand function, aesthetics, work performance, and satisfaction. The Michigan Hand Outcomes Measure comprises 37 items with rating scales ranging from 1 to 5.Every single domain is scored and converted to values that range from 0 to 100. A high score indicates better results, with the exception of pain, in which a high score indicates more intense pain. The total score was calculated as the sum of the six scores divided by six.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactKarim I Saafan, Lecturer of Physical Therapy
dr.karim.saafan@gmail.com+201110127251
Backup ContactHesham G Mahran, Professor of Physical Therapy
heshammahran@cu.edu.eg+201030792492

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026