Skip to content

Effects of Close Follow-up on Patients With Low Back Pain

The Effect of Close Follow-up by a Physician in Addition to a Conventional Physical Therapy Program in Patients With Low Back Pain

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07150702
Enrollment
74
Registered
2025-09-02
Start date
2025-09-01
Completion date
2025-12-10
Last updated
2025-09-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain, Low Back Pain, Mechanical

Keywords

low back pain, physical therapy, mechanical low back pain, pain management

Brief summary

This study will include patients aged 18-65 with subacute or chronic mechanical low back pain who apply to the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinic. The age, gender, body mass index, duration of low back pain, smoking status, and educational status of the patients included in the study will be recorded. Patients will be randomized into two groups: the study group and the control group. First, the psychosocial risk status of patients in both groups will be determined using the STarT Back Screening Tool. Then, patients in the control group will undergo a conventional physical therapy program that includes hot packs, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, ultrasound, and core stabilization exercises. Patients in the study group will undergo daily close follow-up physician-patient meetings during the sessions, in addition to the conventional physical therapy program applied to the control group. Clinical assessments will be performed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Beck's Depression Scale, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs. Clinical evaluations will be conducted at baseline, on Day 5 post-treatment, and at 1 month post-treatment.

Interventions

OTHERConventional physical therapy program

Conventional physical therapy program that includes hot packs, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, ultrasound, and core stabilization exercises

BEHAVIORALClose follow-up by a physician

Daily physician-patient meetings during the sessions

Sponsors

Istanbul Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Patients will be randomized into two groups: the study group and the control group. Patients in the control group will undergo a conventional physical therapy program that includes hot packs, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, ultrasound, and core stabilization exercises. Patients in the study group will undergo daily close follow-up physician-patient meetings during the sessions, in addition to the conventional physical therapy program applied to the control group.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged 18-65 with subacute or chronic mechanical back pain and considered appropriate for a physical therapy program.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients describing inflammatory back pain * Spondyloarthropathies and other rheumatological diseases * History of spinal surgery * Patients with sensory disturbances and psychiatric diagnoses * Fibromyalgia * Patients with malignancies * Patients with active infectious findings * Patients with a history of radiotherapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analog ScaleIt will be evaluated in the baseline,on Day 5 post-treatment, and at 1 month post-treatment.Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score ranges from 0 to 10. High scores describe more pain, and low scores describe less pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Pain Catastrophizing ScaleIt will be evaluated in the baseline,on Day 5 post-treatment, and at 1 month post-treatment.The Pain Catastrophizing Scale is an assessment tool that evaluates how individuals perceive pain and the level of negative thoughts and anxiety they experience related to pain. The scale typically consists of 13 items, assessing the extent to which a person catastrophizes or experiences excessive worry about their pain. Scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 52. Higher scores indicate that the individual evaluates pain in a more negative and catastrophic manner, while lower scores suggest lower levels of anxiety and catastrophizing.
Beck Depression InventoryIt will be evaluated in the baseline,on Day 5 post-treatment, and at 1 month post-treatment.The Beck Depression Inventory is a widely used psychometric tool for assessing the severity of an individual's depression. The scale typically consists of 21 items, each evaluating different emotional, physical, and behavioral symptoms associated with depression. Scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 63. Higher scores indicate more severe depression symptoms, while lower scores suggest fewer or less intense depressive symptoms.
Tampa Scale of KinesiophobiaIt will be evaluated in the baseline,on Day 5 post-treatment, and at 1 month post-treatment.The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia is an assessment tool typically consisting of 17 items that evaluates how much fear or anxiety individuals experience regarding movement, exercise, or physical activity. The scale ranges from a minimum score of 0 to a maximum score of 51. Higher scores indicate greater kinesiophobia (fear of movement), while lower scores reflect less fear and anxiety.
Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and SignsIt will be evaluated in the baseline,on Day 5 post-treatment, and at 1 month post-treatment.The Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs is an assessment tool designed to evaluate the symptoms of neuropathic pain and the severity of these symptoms. The scale consists of 7 items, each assessing sensory changes, pain type, and the intensity of symptoms related to neuropathic pain. Scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 24. Higher scores indicate more severe neuropathic pain symptoms, while lower scores suggest milder or no neuropathic pain symptoms.
Roland-Morris Disability QuestionnaireIt will be evaluated in the baseline,on Day 5 post-treatment, and at 1 month post-treatment.The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire is an assessment tool designed to evaluate the functional limitations and the impact of low back pain on an individual's daily activities. The questionnaire typically consists of 24 items, each exploring how back pain affects physical activities, functionality, and quality of life. Scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 24. Higher scores indicate greater disability and more significant limitations in daily life due to back pain, while lower scores suggest fewer functional restrictions.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
STarT Back Screening ToolIt will be evaluated in the baselineThe STarT Back Screening Tool is an assessment tool used to evaluate risk factors and potential functional limitations in individuals experiencing low back pain. The scale typically consists of 9 items, each addressing psychosocial factors, pain intensity, and functional capacity related to the individual's back pain. Scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 9. Higher scores indicate more severe back pain and an increased presence of psychosocial risk factors, while lower scores suggest lower risk and fewer functional limitations.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026