Skip to content

Digital Silence and Mental Health

Digital Silence and Mental Health: The Effects of a Digital Detox Intervention on Depression, Stress, Anxiety, Sleep Quality, and Emotion Regulation in Young Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07147829
Enrollment
100
Registered
2025-08-29
Start date
2025-10-01
Completion date
2026-01-30
Last updated
2025-09-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depression Anxiety Disorder, Sleep Quality

Brief summary

Social media use has been linked to negative mental health outcomes, including increased anxiety, depression, stress, poor sleep quality, and difficulties in emotion regulation. Digital detox interventions, which involve reducing or temporarily eliminating digital engagement, have emerged as a strategy to mitigate these effects. However, current evidence regarding their effectiveness is mixed and limited by short-term follow-ups and methodological variability. This study aims to examine the impact of a digital detox intervention on depression, anxiety, stress, sleep quality, and emotion regulation in young adults.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALdigital detox

The digital detox intervention differs from other clinical interventions in several key aspects. Unlike pharmacological treatments or traditional psychotherapy, it focuses on behavioral modification by intentionally reducing or eliminating engagement with digital devices and social media for predetermined periods. The intervention emphasizes mindful technology use, limits screen time, and encourages offline activities to restore emotional balance and improve sleep quality. Additionally, it targets the cumulative effects of constant digital exposure, such as information overload, social comparison, and digital dependency, which are not typically addressed in standard mental health interventions. This unique focus on managing digital behavior positions digital detox as a complementary strategy for promoting psychological well-being in young adults.

Sponsors

Ataturk University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 25 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Owning a smartphone * Using social media for ≥ 8 hours per day * Not having a diagnosis related to anxiety, depression, stress, sleep, or emotional regulation * Living in an environment with internet access * Providing voluntary informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Having a history of psychiatric diagnosis * Currently using psychiatric medication * Having received psychological counseling in the past 6 months * Having a diagnosis of sleep disorder

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
DASS 2130 dayThe DASS-21 was developed by Lovibond and Lovibond as a shortened version of the DASS-42. The psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Depression Anxiety Stress-21 (DASS-21) scale in both clinical and non-clinical samples were examined by Sarıçam. In the non-clinical sample, the test-retest correlation coefficients were found to be r = 0.68 for the depression subscale, r = 0.66 for the anxiety subscale, and r = 0.61 for the stress subscale. This scale is a 4-point Likert-type instrument consisting of seven items for each of the three dimensions: depression, anxiety, and stress. A score of 5 or above on the depression subscale, 4 or above on the anxiety subscale, and 8 or above on the stress subscale indicates the presence of the respective problem
PUKİ30 dayThe Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) was developed by Buysse et al. and its validity and reliability in Turkey were established by Ağargün et al. The scale assesses an individual's sleep quality over the past month and consists of 24 items. Nineteen of these are self-report questions, and 18 items are scored across seven components: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction. Each item is rated on a 0-3 scale, with total scores ranging from 0 to 21. Scores of 5 or below indicate good sleep quality, while scores above 5 indicate poor sleep quality. The scale demonstrates a high level of internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.80, and its diagnostic sensitivity (89.6%) and specificity (86.5%) are also high.

Contacts

Primary ContactCeylan AKSOY
ceylangulmez.11@gmail.com+905360595757

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026