Skip to content

Robotic Versus Open Surgery Following Neoadjuvant Therapy in Pancreatic Cancer: Evaluation of Safety and Oncologic Outcomes

Robotic Versus Open Surgery Following Neoadjuvant Therapy in Pancreatic Cancer: Evaluation of Safety and Oncologic Outcomes

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07147374
Enrollment
56
Registered
2025-08-29
Start date
2017-02-01
Completion date
2025-07-31
Last updated
2025-08-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neoadjuvant Therapy, Pancreatic Cancer, Robotic Surgery

Keywords

Pancreatic cancer, Neoadjuvant therapy, Robotic surgery, Open surgery

Brief summary

The feasibility and safety of minimally invasive surgery in cases after neoadjuvant therapy were unclear. It is worth exploring the safety of robotic resection for pancreatic cancer following neoadjuvant therapy. The investigators investigated the comparative outcomes of robotic and open surgery in the management of pancreatic cancer after NAT, exploring the feasibility and safety of robotic procedures in complex cases of pancreatic cancer, and providing evidence-based guidance for clinical practice.

Detailed description

Currently, most studies focus on upfront resectable pancreatic cancer, benign or low-grade malignant tumors, demonstrating that robotic surgery can shorten postoperative hospital stays, reduce intraoperative blood loss, and achieve oncological outcomes comparable to open surgery. The feasibility and safety of minimally invasive surgery in cases after NAT were unclear. Both the Miami international evidence-based consensus and the Brescia international validated European guidelines indicate that current data are insufficient to recommend minimally invasive approaches for pancreatic cancer resection following NAT, highlighting the need for additional research. Therefore, it is worth exploring the safety of robotic resection for pancreatic cancer following NAT. The investigators investigated the comparative outcomes of robotic and open surgery in the management of pancreatic cancer after NAT, exploring the feasibility and safety of robotic procedures in complex cases of pancreatic cancer, and providing evidence-based guidance for clinical practice.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age over 18 years. * Received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. * Postoperative pathology confirmed pancreatic cancer. * Underwent either open or robotic surgery.

Exclusion criteria

* Intraoperative discovery of unresectable tumor or presence of distant metastasis. * ASA score ≥ 4.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall complicationUntil the 90 days after surgeryThe complication occurred within 90 days after the surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulaUntil the 90 days after surgeryGrade B or C pancreatic fistula within 90 days after surgery
Postoperative pancreatectomy hemorrhageUntil the 90 days after surgeryHemorrhage occurred within 90 days after surgery
Disease-free survivalUp to 2 years after the surgeryThe length of time from the completion of surgery until the recurrence of cancer, the occurrence of metastasis, death from any cause, or to the last follow-up.
Overall survivalUp to 2 years after surgeryThe length of time from the date of surgery to death from any cause or to the last follow-up.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026