Skip to content

Comparison of Operative Hysteroscopy Performed in the Operating Room Versus Outpatient Settings

Comparison of Operative Hysteroscopy Performed in the Operating Room Versus Outpatient Settings : A Prospective Observational Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07146659
Enrollment
400
Registered
2025-08-28
Start date
2025-07-01
Completion date
2027-05-31
Last updated
2025-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fibroid Uterus, Polyp Uterus, Retained Products of Conception

Keywords

Hysteroscopy, Operative hysteroscopy, Outpatient ambulatory, Patient satisfaction, Outpatient hysteroscopy, Complications

Brief summary

This is an observational prospective monocentric study which aims to compare operative hysteroscopies performed in the operating room under general or loco-regional anesthesia and those performed outside the operating room (outpatient operative hysteroscopy). The primary outcome is the success rate of the procedure. Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain, patient satisfaction, complications, and time to return to work.

Detailed description

Operative hysteroscopy is a key technique for the treatment of intrauterine pathologies such as endometrial polyps, submucosal fibroids, retained products of conception. Traditionally, operative hysteroscopies are performed in the operating room under general or regional anesthesia, requiring either ambulatory or inpatient hospitalization. In recent years, advances in hysteroscopic instrumentation and procedural techniques have made it possible to perform selected operative hysteroscopies in outpatient settings (consultation office) without general or regional anesthesia. Several studies have demonstrated the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of outpatient operative hysteroscopy, with similar success rates and complication profiles compared to procedures performed in the operating room, although some studies reported higher levels of pain during outpatient procedures (1-3) . Furthermore, cost-effectiveness studies support outpatient procedures by highlighting reduced hospital resource utilization and shorter recovery times for patients (4-6). The HOPE study aims to evaluate this practice locally at the Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil. This prospective monocentric observational study will include approximately 400 patients over a two-year period (July 2025 - May 2027). The primary objective is to compare the success rates of operative hysteroscopies performed in the operating room versus those performed in an outpatient setting. Secondary objectives include assessment of perioperative and postoperative pain, patient satisfaction, complication rates, and the time to return to work. Data will be collected from medical records and patient-reported outcomes using a satisfaction questionnaire. Inclusion of patients will follow the usual care pathway, without additional interventions or follow-up beyond standard clinical practice.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Creteil
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Women aged ≥ 18 years -⁃ Undergoing operative hysteroscopy for intrauterine pathology * Able to provid e informed non-opposition * French-speaking

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with contraindications to hysteroscopy * Pregnancy * Inability to complete follow-up

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
This will be assessed as an ordinal qualitative variable, with procedures classified into three categories:number of complete success, number of partial success, or number of failure.The classification will be determined by the surgeon at the end of the procedure and documented in the operative report (baseline)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
4. Time to return to work Measured as the number of days of sick leave prescribed and actually taken.Up to 8 weeks postoperatively.
Perioperative and postoperative pain Assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)During the procedure (if the patient is awake), immediately after the procedure, and at hospital discharge (baseline)
Patient satisfaction Assessed using a locally developed patient satisfaction questionnaireAt hospital discharge.(assessed up to 5 days)
Complications including uterine perforation, hemorrhage, and postoperative infectionRecorded during the procedure and immediately afterward (documented in the operative report and medical records), and up to 8 weeks postoperatively during the follow-up consultation if necessary.

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactYann SALHI, MD
yann.salhi@chicreteil.fr0157022000
Backup ContactElie MOSNINO, MD
elie.mosnino@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026