Skip to content

Comparison of Sublay and Onlay Mesh Repair in Ventral Hernia

Comparison of Sublay Versus Onlay Mesh Repair for Ventral Abdominal Wall Hernia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07140471
Enrollment
96
Registered
2025-08-24
Start date
2022-02-01
Completion date
2023-08-28
Last updated
2025-08-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Incisional Hernia, Ventral Hernia

Keywords

Sublay Mesh Repair, Onlay Mesh Repair, Polypropylene Mesh, Hernia Surgery, Wound Infection, Seroma Formation, Hernia Recurrence, Randomized Controlled Trial, Open Hernia Repair

Brief summary

This study is designed to compare two different surgical methods for repairing ventral abdominal wall hernias: sublay mesh repair and onlay mesh repair. Ventral hernias are common and occur when tissue pushes through a weak spot in the abdominal wall. Both sublay and onlay techniques involve placing a synthetic mesh to strengthen the abdominal wall, but the position of the mesh differs. This trial will evaluate postoperative outcomes, including surgical wound infections, seroma (fluid buildup), and hernia recurrence, over a six-month follow-up period. The findings are expected to help inform surgical decision-making, particularly in resource-limited hospitals.

Detailed description

This prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial aims to compare outcomes between sublay and onlay mesh repair techniques in patients with ventral abdominal wall hernias. The study is being conducted at Recep Tayyip Erdogan Hospital, Muzaffargarh, Pakistan, from February 2022 to August 2023. A total of 96 patients aged 18-60 years with primary or incisional ventral hernias (defect size 40-100 mm) are included. Patients are randomized into two groups: Group A undergoes onlay mesh repair, and Group B undergoes sublay mesh repair. Both procedures involve placement of macroporous polypropylene mesh with appropriate overlap and standard fixation techniques. Primary outcomes include wound infection (as per CDC criteria), seroma formation (confirmed by ultrasound), and hernia recurrence (clinically and via ultrasonography) at six-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes include operative time, postoperative pain (measured via visual analog scale), and hospital stay duration. Data analysis will be performed using SPSS v26.0.

Interventions

Polypropylene mesh is placed over the anterior rectus sheath and fixed with Prolene sutures after hernia sac reduction.

Polypropylene mesh placed in the retrorectus space and fixed with Prolene sutures after Rectus Sheath Dissection

Sponsors

Sana Ehsan ullah
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

This was an open-label study with no masking.

Intervention model description

Participants were randomized into two parallel arms: one receiving onlay mesh repair and the other receiving sublay mesh repair.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Age 18 to 60 years Primary or incisional ventral abdominal wall hernia Hernia defect size between 40-100 mm Duration of hernia ≥6 months Suitable for open mesh hernioplasty Written informed consent provided

Exclusion criteria

Diabetes mellitus \>5 years Chronic liver disease Obstructed or strangulated hernia Immunocompromised status Severe cardiopulmonary disease or contraindications to general anesthesia Pregnant or lactating women Inability to attend follow-up visits

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of surgical wound infectionWithin 30 days after surgeryWound infection was assessed based on CDC criteria: fever \>38°C, erythema, purulent discharge, or swelling at the surgical site. Evaluated daily during hospitalization and at 2-week follow-up.
Incidence of seroma formationWithin 30 days postoperativelySeroma defined as subcutaneous fluid accumulation confirmed by clinical exam and ultrasonography. Evaluated during follow-up visits.
Hernia recurrence rate6-month follow-upRecurrence assessed through physical examination and confirmed via ultrasonography at 6 months after surgery.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean operative timeTime in minutes from skin incision to skin closure, recorded intraoperatively.During surgery
Length of postoperative hospital stayFrom the day of surgery until hospital discharge (average of 3-7 days).Number of days from surgery to discharge recorded for each participant.
Postoperative pain scoreAt 6 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours after surgery, and then every 48 hours thereafter until hospital dischargePain evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain) during inpatient stay.

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026