Skip to content

Graston Technique vs Dynamic Oscillation Stretching Technique For High Heel Users And Its Impact On Body Posture

Comparative Analysis Of Graston Technique Versus Dynamic Oscillation Stretching Technique For High Heel Users And Its Impact On Body Posture

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07138924
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-08-24
Start date
2024-11-01
Completion date
2025-07-30
Last updated
2025-08-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hyperlordosis

Keywords

Hyperlordosis Anterior pelvic tilt Graston Technique Dynamic Oscillating Stretch

Brief summary

In high heel users, most of the previous work has focused on the lower limb. However, we did not find any study that specifically targeted the lumbar region. The novelty of this study lies in raising awareness that high heel users experience a full-body postural disturbance. While studies had involved the lower limb, but it is crucial to also include the lumbar region. This is because high heel users often feel more pain in the lower limb, which may be leading us to focus solely on lower limb and neglect the lumbar region. However, the mechanics of the lumbar region are also deteriorating along with the lower limb, which may lead to musculoskeletal related issues to high heel users in future. In Pakistan, no previous research is conducted, That compare the effect of Graston Technique Versus DOST in female wearing high heels and its impact on posture.

Detailed description

The consequences of wearing high heels included increased bending of the hips and knees, anterior pelvic tilting, and increased lumbar lordosis in the spine. Wearers of high heels reported reduced dorsiflexion. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of Graston technique and Dynamic Oscillatory Stretch (DOST) technique in improving lumbar lordosis, anterior pelvic tilting and function status in high heel users. This study is randamized control trial. The sample size of this study is 30 participants which would be divided into two group, 15 each. Non-probability Convenience sampling will be used and participants are randomly assigned into Group A (Graston Technique) Group B (DOST) through envelope sealed method after baseline assessment . The participants of both group were evaluated on three occasions; (i) baseline, (ii) 5th session and (iii) 12th session.

Interventions

Firstly, apply a moisturizer or gel to affected part. Then gentle strokes are applied from proximal to distal direction to assess trigger point or taut band. After knowing the exact area, apply strokes gently with minimum force in all directions by keeping tool in 30- 60-degree angle. Total Application time will be between 40-120 seconds. conservative physiotherapy treatment plan is hot pack for 10-15 min, calf stetches 10 reps x 2 sets and post session cold pack for 5 min. Home exercise plan is william training i.e. single knee to chest, double knee to chest, pelvic tilts, iliospoas stretch, hamstring stretch and squat (10reps x1 set)

Passively stretch that is at the first point of stretch sensation. The next component to DOS, 2-sec, passive stretch with slow oscillation. Total 10 reps x 2 sec hold oscillations x 3 sets.conservative physiotherapy treatment plan is hot pack for 10-15 min, calf stetches 10 reps x 2 sets and post session cold pack for 5 min. Home exercise plan is william training i.e. single knee to chest, double knee to chest, pelvic tilts, iliospoas stretch, hamstring stretch and squat (10reps x1 set)

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* • Only female were included * Age group 20 to 40 years. * Duration of wearing HH: \>1 yr. * Wearing HH for \> 3 times a wk. and 5 hrs/ day. * Heel height: 2 inch and above * Decreased ankle Dorsiflexion (less than 17 degrees) * Lumber lordosis increased (\> 40). * Muscle tightness (Paraspinal, hamstring, gastrocnemius and soleus).

Exclusion criteria

* • DVT, malignancy, infection. * Eczema or other skin diseases. * MSK injury or surgery of LL. * Sciatica or other Neuropathy/ Neurological disorder * Acute Cardio-Respiratory disorder

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Flexicurve Ruler3 weekThe Flexicurve ruler allows us to measure the curves of your spine. The Flexicurve is a strip of flexible metal covered in plastic. It will place at the top of the back then gently bend it so it reflects the shape of the backbone.
Inclinometer3 weekInclinometer is a specialized tool used to measure angles and range of motion of joints. It is used to measure pelvic tilt.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gonimeter3 weekA device that measures an angle or allows an object to be rotated to a certain position. In orthopedics, the former description is more accurate. Goniometry is the art and science of measuring joint ranges in each plane of the joint
Lower Extremity Functional Scale3 weekThe LEFS can be used to evaluate the functional impairment of a patient with a disorder of one or both lower extremities. It can be used to monitor the patient over time and to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention.

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026