Demineralization, Remineralization, Dental Cavity, Enamel Lesions
Conditions
Keywords
enamel mircrohardness, enamel demineralization-remineralization
Brief summary
Clinical study to evaluate the anti-cavity effectiveness of three dentrifices using an intra-oral enamel Demineralization and Remineralization In-Situ Model. This is a six-week duration, Phase III, single-center, triple-blind crossover study. Thirty-six healthy adults will be randomly allocated to three groups for the treatment phases, which are interspersed with washout periods.
Detailed description
This Phase III, randomized, triple-blind, crossover study will assess the anti-cavity effectiveness of three different dentrifices. Thirty-six participants, aged 18-70, will use an intra-oral appliance. For six weeks, they will be divided into three treatment groups and instructed to brush twice daily with one of the following: one using a fluoride-free toothpaste with a chalk base and herbal ingredients, another using a fluoride toothpaste containing 1000 ppm MFP and 1.5% arginine in a PCC/RNCC base, and a negative control group using a fluoride-free toothpaste in a PCC/RNCC base. Each participant will receive a soft-bristle toothbrush and the toothpastes assigned. Between each five-day treatment phase, participants will have a nine-day washout period, using a fluoride-free toothpaste in a PCC/RNCC base. The study's eight-visit schedule includes a baseline visit, three treatment phases, three washout periods interspersed between the treatment phases, and a final visit. The primary outcome will be the measurement of changes in enamel microhardness, with assessments taking place both before and after each treatment to determine the impact on the enamel. The expected outcome is the confirmation of the alternative hypothesis, which predicts a reduction in the percentage of mineral loss from the surface of bovine enamel after using dentifrices containing 1000 ppm MFP with 1.5% arginine or herbal ingredients for five days each, compared to the control group. The percentage of mineral loss on the tooth surface relative to baseline will be used to quantify the extent of reduction in enamel demineralization. A two factor ANCOVA using the baseline as the covariate will be conducted to determine if a significant treatment effect exists. Adverse events and compliance will be closely monitored, with strict confidentiality maintained for all participants.
Interventions
Fluoride free toothpaste in a chalk base with herbal ingredients
DRUGFluoride Toothpaste
Fluoride toothpaste containing 1000 ppm MFP and 1.5% arginine in a PCC/RNCC base
Fluoride free toothpaste in a PCC/RNCC base
DEVICEToothbrush
A commercially available adult soft bristle toothbrush
Sponsors
Colgate Palmolive
Federal University of Alagoas
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Intervention model description
This is a Phase III, randomized, one-center, crossover group, triple blind, clinical study with an intra-oral enamel Demineralization - Remineralization In-Situ Model.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
Potential subjects must meet ALL of the following criteria: * Males and females, between 18-70 years of age (inclusive); * Informed Consent Form signed and availability for the duration of the study; * Good general health (absence of any condition that, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator, might constitute a risk to the subject while participating in the study. Examples include heart problems, valve/hip replacements, etc); * Willingness to provide information related to their medical history; * Minimum of 20 uncrowned permanent natural teeth (excluding third molars); Normal salivary flow; * Willingness to wear an intra-oral appliance all day as instructed except when eating and drinking.
Exclusion criteria
Potential subjects must NOT HAVE ANY of the following conditions: * Oral pathology, chronic disease, or a history of allergy to testing products; * Subject using anticonvulsants, antihistamines, antidepressants, sedatives, tranquilizers, anti-inflammatory medication or daily analgesics within one month prior to the start of the study or scheduled to start such intake during the course of the study; * Subject participating in any other clinical study; * Subject pregnant or breastfeeding; * Subject allergic to oral care products, personal care consumer products, or their ingredients; * Extended use of antibiotics or therapeutic mouthwash any time during the three months prior to entry into the study; * A medical history reporting that the subject has a current systemic or autoimmune disease, such as diabetes, lupus, etc.; * Ongoing use of medications known to affect the gingival tissues (i.e. calcium channel blockers, phenytoin, cyclosporine); * Advanced periodontal disease (purulent exudate, tooth mobility, and/or extensive loss of periodontal attachment or alveolar bone). Pocket depth equal or greater than 4 mm; * Five or more decayed, untreated dental sites (cavities); * Current smokers and subjects with a history of alcohol or drug abuse; * Dental work prevents wearing of the appliance or a reported need to wear a night guard.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Microhardness change | 6 weeks | The primary outcome of this study will be the change in the hardness of an intra-oral appliance before and after treatment. It will be determined by measuring the length of an indentation made on the appliance, which in turn allows for the calculation of its hardness value. The effectiveness of the treatment in reducing enamel demineralization by quantifying the percentage of mineral loss relative to the baseline will also be assessed. |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORNatanael Santos, PhD
Federal University of Alagoas
Outcome results
None listed