Skip to content

Intraligamentary vs Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block for Pulpitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Is Intraligamentary Injection the Anesthesia of Choice for Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis in Mandibular Molars? A Multicenter Randomized Comparative Trial.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07130760
Enrollment
52
Registered
2025-08-19
Start date
2025-06-20
Completion date
2027-07-31
Last updated
2025-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis (SIP), Dental Pain, Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Failure, Local Anesthesia

Keywords

Inferior alveolar nerve block, Pulpitis Mandibular molars, Emergency dental treatment, Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis, Randomized clinical trial, Endodontics, Dental pain, Local anesthesia, Intraligamentary anesthesia

Brief summary

This multicenter randomized trial compares the clinical effectiveness of intraligamentary injection versus inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular molars. The goal is to determine which technique provides better pain control during endodontic treatment.

Detailed description

Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular molars presents a clinical challenge due to the difficulty in achieving profound anesthesia. This prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial evaluates two anesthetic techniques-intraligamentary injection (ILA) versus inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB)-to compare their efficacy in eliminating pain during endodontic access. Patients will be enrolled from multiple dental centers following standardized inclusion and exclusion criteria. Pain will be assessed using validated scales. Statistical analysis will be conducted to determine significant differences in anesthetic success between groups.

Interventions

PROCEDUREIntraligamentary Injection

Intraligamentary local anesthesia will be administered using a standard dental syringe with 2% lidocaine and 1:100,000 epinephrine.

Inferior alveolar nerve block will be performed with 2% lidocaine and 1:100,000 epinephrine using the conventional technique.

Sponsors

Aula Dental Avanzada
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Participants will be unaware of which anesthetic technique is administered. Operators cannot be blinded due to the nature of the procedures.

Intervention model description

Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either intraligamentary injection or inferior alveolar nerve block prior to endodontic treatment of mandibular molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adults aged 18 years or older * Presenting with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in a mandibular molar * Vital response to cold testing * Ability to understand and provide informed consent * Available for follow-up and data collection

Exclusion criteria

* Known allergy to lidocaine or epinephrine * Pregnancy or breastfeeding * Use of analgesics or anti-inflammatory drugs in the previous 6 hours * Non-vital or previously treated teeth * Significant systemic disease (ASA III or above) * History of psychiatric or neurological disorders affecting pain perception

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain during endodontic accessImmediately after access cavity preparation (within 30 minutes of anesthesia)Pain intensity experienced by the patient during endodontic access after the assigned anesthetic technique.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Need for supplementary anesthesiaDuring access or initial root canal instrumentation (within first 45 minutes)Whether the initial anesthesia technique was sufficient or required additional anesthetic injection to complete the procedure pain-free.
Patient satisfaction immediately after treatmentEnd of visit (within 1 hour)Patient-reported satisfaction immediately after treatment will be measured using a 5-point Likert scale. The scale ranges from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied). Higher scores indicate better satisfaction.
Postoperative pain at 7 daysDay 7 post-treatmentPain intensity reported by the patient at day 7 after treatment will be assessed using a 4-point ordinal scale: 1 (none), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe). Higher scores indicate worse pain.
Patient satisfaction at 7 daysDay 7 post-treatmentPatient-reported satisfaction one week after treatment will be measured using a 5-point Likert scale. The scale ranges from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied). Higher scores indicate better satisfaction.

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Primary ContactGuillem Esteve-Pardo, PhD
guillem@clinicaesteve.com34965215755

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026