Skip to content

Comparative Study Between US Guided Erector Spinae and US Guided Cudal Epidural Block

Comparative Study Between US Guided Erector Spinae and US Guided Cudal Epidural Block in Paediatric Unilateral Inguinal Hernia Repair Adjuvant to General Anaesthesia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07127601
Enrollment
50
Registered
2025-08-17
Start date
2023-01-01
Completion date
2023-12-01
Last updated
2025-08-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia, Hernia, Inguinal

Brief summary

Inguinal hernia is a common condition requiring surgical repair in the pediatric age group. The incidence of inguinal hernias is approximately 3% to 5% in term infants and 13% in infants born at less than 33 weeks of gestational age. Inguinal hernias in both term and preterm infants are commonly repaired shortly after diagnosis to avoid incarceration of the hernia. Given the lack of definitive data, optimal timing for repair of inguinal hernias in infants remains debatable\[1\]. : An erector spinae plane block is a relatively new regional anesthetic technique. Apart from case reports and small series, the literature regarding pediatric use is limited. The first author to describe caudal anaesthesia as applied to children (here in connection with urologic surgical procedures) was Meredith Campbell in 1933.(2) Over time, this idea has developed into a technique of great interest, especially for use in premature infants and in newborns, considering that these paediatric subgroups are, as a result of an immature state of the CNS, at high risk of perioperative respiratory depression. This study will be conducted to compare caudal versus ESPB as regard intraoperative and postoperative analgesia in unilateral inguinal hernia and the feasibility of ESPB in paediatric patient.

Interventions

PROCEDUREUltrasound guided erector spinae plain block (ESPB).

Depending on the size of patient, either a 27 g 3 cm hypodermic needle or a 21 g 5 or 10 cm short bevel needle was used. All blocks were performed with the ultrasound guidance in the parasagittal position and with continuous in-plane needle visualization. The local anesthetic was deposited in the fascial plane deep to the erector spinae muscle superficial to the transverse processes, after confirming the correct tissue plane by hydro-dissection. protocols for choosing 0.25% bupivacaine with a dose of 0.5ml/kg was determined by the age and weight of the patient.

Sponsors

Ain Shams University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Months to 6 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* age 3 moonths 6 years old * American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I, II for non complicated inguinal hernia.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with a sepsis * malignancy anywhere * patient with bleeding tendencies or on anticoagulation therapy, * allergy to study drugs * congenital anomalies * delayed motor or developmental milestones

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
heart rate response to skin incisionbasal before surgery, after 5 minutes intra-operative, 10 minutes intra-operative, 15 minutes intra-operativecount of heart beats per minute

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pain scoresat recovery, 30 minutes postoperative, 1 hour postoperative, 3 hours postoperative, 6 hours postoperativeFLACC score at recovery FLACC score at recovery FLAAC score

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026