Skip to content

Critical Appraisals at Play

Critical Appraisals at Play: Elevating EM Journal Clubs With Team-Based Competition

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07126314
Enrollment
36
Registered
2025-08-17
Start date
2025-08-13
Completion date
2026-06-10
Last updated
2025-08-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Medical Education

Keywords

Emergency Medicine education, Journal club innovation, Gamified learning, Critical appraisal skills, Team-based competition, Resident engagement, Didactic enhancement, Pre/post intervention, Survey-based evaluation, Emergency Medicine residents, Residency training programs

Brief summary

Pre and Post assessment of knowledge and attitudes on critical appraisal of biomedical literature in Emergency Medicine practice in a cohort of residents with implementation of a competition based educational format.

Detailed description

During the academic year of 2025-2026, the 36 Emergency Medicine residents of a community medicine affiliate of a tertiary medical center will be compete against each other during the journal club didactic. Three residents will be assigned each month, one from each year, to select a journal article matching the curricular content block of that month. Residents will submit their selected article after faculty approval. Residents will submit their critiques of the journal articles prior to the scheduled journal club via a dedicated residency website. They will focus on potential methodological flaws of the article. This is congruent to how journal club didactics were focused in the past in the institution, so second and third years will have had exposure to this approach. During journal club, besides having the resident that selected the article briefly present it, resident critiques will be discussed. A single point will be awarded to each resident for each critique they have submitted. For critiques of significant merit, as determined by the faculty, the journal club facilitator will invite the submitting resident to discuss their critique, and will be awarded 2 points. To discourage artificial intelligence (AI) use without learning, critiques will be selected at faculty discretion to be orally explained during journal club to the satisfaction of the faculty. The faculty have determined that if residents utilize AI as a tool to enhance their learning (instead of simply enumerating critiques blindly on a document), this is in service towards the goal of journal club, and should be encouraged. As a reward, residents that have the highest running score will receive $100 Amazon gift cards, tiered by 1st, 2nd, and 3rd year academic status. Attitudes towards the importance of critical assessment of scientific literature, self assessments of fluency in scientific literature appraisal, and the effectiveness of journal club, will be conducted via anonymous survey on RedCap at the beginning and end of the academic year. The survey utilized will be the modified version of a previously validated survey used by Haspel2. Additionally, residents will be assigned Journal Club based quizzes from Rosh Review13, a platform tailored for resident education, at the beginning and end of the year. Rosh Review provides comparative benchmarks that can be used to assess resident performance.

Interventions

OTHERCompetition based Education Format

Residents will be organized into 3 teams, each competing to amass points for critiquing articles presented during journal club, for a prize.

Sponsors

Community Medical Center, Toms River, NJ
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Pre and Post Intervention

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All emergency medicine residents at study site

Exclusion criteria

* none

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in score in knowledge based quiz11 monthsA journal club based quiz, created by Rosh Review, will be administered pre and post. Changes in scores will be noted.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in knowledge quiz compared to benchmark score11 monthsDifferences in knowledge score compared to benchmark scores Rosh Review maintains
Changes in attitudes regarding comfort in interpreting biomedical literature11 monthsChanges in attitudes regarding comfort in interpreting biomedical literature as measured by validated survey
Subjective assessment of value of curriculum11 monthsSubjective assessment of value of curriculum by a survey with likert scale and free entry items

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026