Skip to content

A PHASE II PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-MASKED CONTROLLED STUDY ASSESSING THE SAFETY & EFFICACY OF RHPRG4 (450 µG/ML RECOMBINANT HUMAN PROTEOGLYCAN 4) COMPARED TO VEHICLE FOR THE TREATMENT OF SJÖGREN'S RELATED DRY EYE DISEASE

A PHASE II PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-MASKED CONTROLLED STUDY ASSESSING THE SAFETY & EFFICACY OF RHPRG4 (450 µG/ML RECOMBINANT HUMAN PROTEOGLYCAN 4) COMPARED TO VEHICLE FOR THE TREATMENT OF SJÖGREN'S RELATED DRY EYE DISEASE

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07118241
Enrollment
80
Registered
2025-08-12
Start date
2025-09-17
Completion date
2026-08-01
Last updated
2026-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sjögren's Syndrome

Keywords

Sjogrens Syndrome, Dry Eye

Brief summary

rhPRG4-Sjögren's-002 is a prospective multi-center study conducted in Australia to evaluate the safety and efficacy of topically-applied rhPRG4 in subjects with Sjögren's related Dry Eye Disease.

Interventions

DRUGRecombinant Human Proteoglycan 4

rhPRG4 450ug/ml

DRUGVehicle Control

PBS based Vehicle Conrtol

Sponsors

Lubris Bio Pty Ltd
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Have the ability to comprehend and provide a signed and dated consent form. 2. Are 18-75 years at time of consent; 3. Have been diagnosed with SS for at least 3 months prior to ICF; 4. Have been using artificial tears as the only topical treatment of SS related dry eye for at least 30 days prior to Visit 1; 5. Have been stably using systemic medications for at least one month prior to Visit 1; 6. Have Global SANDE score ≥ 40; 7. Average VAS score for typical symptoms of dry eye (dryness, foreign body sensation, burning/stinging, itching, pain, stick feeling, blurred vision and photophobia) ≥ 25 mm, none \< 5 mm; 8. Have Oxford corneal fluorescein staining grade of ≥ 1 and ≤ 2 in each eye (OD \& OS both ≥ 1 and ≤ 2); 9. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures, attend all scheduled clinic visits, and continue participation for the duration of the study. 10. Ability to self-administer study medication and willingness to adhere to the medication regimen.

Exclusion criteria

1. Are currently or have a history of any ocular or systemic disorder or condition other than dry eye that based on investigator judgment will interfere with the interpretation of the study results. Examples of ocular or systemic disorders or conditions include active ocular infection, conjunctivochalasis, superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis, limbal stem cell deficiency, allergic conjunctivitis, giant papillary conjunctivitis, atopic keratoconjunctivitis, anterior basement membrane dystrophies, neurotrophic keratitis, corneal dystrophy, exposure keratitis, moderate to severe blepharitis, ocular trauma, progressive or degenerative corneal conditions, uveitis, and systemic infection; 2. Have used any topical ocular medications (other than artificial tears), therapeutic medical devices, or undergone ocular surgery within the 30 days prior to Visit 1. Topical ocular medications include cyclosporine, lifitegrast, corticosteroid eye drops, and autologous/serum. Therapeutic medical devices include trigeminal stimulation, meibomian glad warming (excepting at home masks) or expression, intense pulsed light, low level light therapy, etc. Ocular surgeries include laser or refractive surgical procedures, insertion of punctal or punctal cauterization; 3. Are unwilling to forgo the use of topical medications (other than IMP and limited artificial tear use), medical devices or ocular surgery from Visit 1 through Visit 4. 4. Have only one eye; 5. Are unwilling to adhere to t.i.d. administration of vehicle during run-in; 6. Are unwilling to limit the use of artificial tears to no more than 4 days during run-in; 7. Have begun regularly using systemic compounds for SS or SS-related dry eye during the one month prior to Visit 1. Systemic compounds include omega-3 oil (fish oil, flaxseed oil, etc.), systemic corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, and biologics that based on investigator judgment will interfere with the interpretation of the study results. 8. Are unwilling to maintain a stable regimen of systemic compound use during the duration of the study; 9. Have known hypersensitivity to one of the components of the study or procedural medications; 10. Have participated in another clinical study at the same time as the present study or within 30 days of Visit 1; 11. Have a history of drug, medication or alcohol abuse or addiction; 12. Are females of childbearing potential (those who are not surgically sterilized or post-menopausal for at least 1 year) who meet any one of the following conditions: 1. are currently pregnant or, 2. have a positive result on the urine pregnancy test at the Screening Visit or, 3. intend to become pregnant during the entire course of and 30 days after the study treatment periods, or, 4. are breast-feeding or, 5. not willing to use highly effective birth control measures, such as: Hormonal contraceptives - oral, implanted, transdermal, or injected and/or mechanical barrier methods, during the entire course of and 30 days after the study treatment periods; 13. Are males with a female partner of child bearing potential where: 1. the male is not surgically sterilized or, 2. where the male partner cannot provide information regarding the female partner's child bearing status or, 3. where the child bearing status of the female partner does not meet that of

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To assess the efficacy of rhPRG4 by looking at the frequency of patients attaining complete resolution of total corneal staining with fluorescein (Oxford Scale) at Day 28From baseline to the end of treatment at day 28To assess the efficacy of rhPRG4 by looking at the frequency of patients attaining complete resolution of total corneal staining with fluorescein (Oxford Scale) at Day 28

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To assess the safety of rhPRG4 by observation of the severity of treatment-emergent adverse events for the study durationFrom baseline to day 28To assess the safety of rhPRG4 by observation of the severity of treatment-emergent adverse events for the study duration
To assess the safety of rhPRG4 by observation of the change in BCVA over 28 daysFrom baseline to day 28To assess the safety of rhPRG4 by observation of the change in BCVA over 28 days
To assess the safety of rhPRG4 by observation of signs evaluated by slit lamp examination (SLE) (Meibomian glands, Eyelid Erythema, Eyelid Oedema, Lashes, Conjunctiva Erythema, Lens, Iris, Anterior Chamber, Hyperemia, Corneal transparency & Corneal neoFrom baseline to day 28To assess the safety of rhPRG4 by observation of signs evaluated by slit lamp examination (SLE) (Meibomian glands, Eyelid Erythema, Eyelid Oedema, Lashes, Conjunctiva Erythema, Lens, Iris, Anterior Chamber, Hyperemia, Corneal transparency \& Corneal neovascularization)
To assess the safety of rhPRG4 by observation of intraocular pressure (IOP)From baseline to day 28To assess the safety of rhPRG4 by observation of intraocular pressure (IOP)
To assess the efficacy of rhPRG4 using the total VAS score for dryness, foreign body sensation, burning/stinging, itching, pain, sticky feeling, blurred vision and photophobia (anchors: none & severe) at Day 28From baseline to day 28To assess the efficacy of rhPRG4 using the total VAS score for dryness, foreign body sensation, burning/stinging, itching, pain, sticky feeling, blurred vision and photophobia (anchors: none \& severe) at Day 28
To assess the efficacy of rhPRG4 using the SANDE score compared to vehicle at Day 28From baseline to day 28To assess the efficacy of rhPRG4 using the SANDE score compared to vehicle at Day 28
To assess the efficacy of rhPRG4 using the Oxford staining score, both per eye and as a total score per subject compared to vehicle at Day 28From baseline to day 28To assess the efficacy of rhPRG4 using the Oxford staining score, both per eye and as a total score per subject compared to vehicle at Day 28

Countries

Australia

Contacts

CONTACTEdward CEO
ertruitt@lubris.net6193394016

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 23, 2026