Skip to content

Artificial Intelligence-powered Low-Dose Computed Tomography for Screening of Pancreatic Cancer

Artificial Intelligence-powered Low-Dose Computed Tomography for Screening of Pancreatic Cancer

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07117045
Acronym
AI-LDCT-PC
Enrollment
400000
Registered
2025-08-12
Start date
2025-08-15
Completion date
2032-12-30
Last updated
2025-08-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

High-grade Pancreatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia, Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm, Mucinous Cystic Neoplasm, Pancreatic Cancer, PDAC - Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Keywords

Screening, Early Diagnosis, Pancreatic Cancer, Artificial Intelligence, Computed Tomography

Brief summary

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a poor prognosis, with early diagnosis crucial for improving survival. Due to the absence of effective screening methods, most patients are diagnosed at advanced stages. The population undergoing low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening significantly overlaps with those at high risk for PDAC; however, traditional imaging methods have limited sensitivity for detecting pancreatic lesions. This study utilizes the Pancreatic Cancer Detection with Artificial Intelligence (PANDA) system to enhance LDCT for pancreatic cancer screening in a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort. PANDA will analyze LDCT images, followed by a multidisciplinary team (MDT) reassessment of abnormal interpretations. Based on MDT evaluation, individuals will be recalled for further examination, placed under a personalized follow-up plan, or monitored for at least one year. The primary outcomes include pancreatic cancer detection rate, positive predictive value, consensus rate, and recall rate, while secondary outcomes focus on early-stage cancers, resectable tumors, and safety indicators such as false positive rates and unnecessary procedures. This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of AI-assisted LDCT for PDAC detection, providing a practical solution for improving public health and enhancing early diagnostic capabilities.

Detailed description

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an extremely aggressive cancer with a dismal 5-year survival rate of just 13%. The key to improving outcomes lies in early detection, as patients diagnosed at an early stage (IA) can achieve an 80% 5-year survival. However, current screening methods are limited, focusing only on high-risk populations and lacking effectiveness for the general public due to the cancer's relatively low incidence and high false-positive risks. Contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT), the primary imaging modality, faces barriers for widespread implementation due to its invasiveness, high costs, and need for contrast agents. In this context, low-dose CT (LDCT) emerges as a promising alternative, having demonstrated success in lung cancer screening by reducing radiation exposure. Retrospective analysis revealed that one-third of pancreatic abnormalities were missed during routine LDCT interpretations, suggesting the untapped potential of LDCT-based pancreatic lesion screening. Breakthroughs in AI have transformed medical imaging. Our PANDA (pancreatic cancer detection with artifcial intelligence) system excels at pancreatic cancer detection, utilizing innovative registration techniques and a cascaded deep learning framework (UNet+Max-Deeplab) for comprehensive lesion analysis. Validated across 10 centers (6,239 patients), PANDA outperformed radiologists. Real-world testing (20,530 cases) demonstrated remarkable accuracy: 92.9% sensitivity and 99.9% specificity, maintaining 92.2% sensitivity even for small T1 tumors. On LDCT, PANDA achieved 0.979 AUC without protocol modifications, confirming LDCT+AI as a viable screening approach. China's health check-up environment presents three key advantages: First, LDCT delivers just 1/4-1/5 the radiation of standard abdominal CT, staying within ICRP safety guidelines (\<3mSv). Second, LDCT offers superior cost-effectiveness compared to CE-CT by eliminating contrast agent expenses. Third, China's extensive annual health check-up infrastructure provides an unparalleled foundation for widespread implementation. In the study, we will conduct a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort design targeting a health check-up population, utilizing the PANDA system to enhance LDCT for pancreatic cancer screening. Initially, PANDA analyzes the LDCT images of participants and provides interpretation results. Subsequently, a multidisciplinary team (MDT) will re-evaluate the cases with positive AI findings (including PDAC, pancreatic precursor lesions and benign lesion) and determine whether to recall the individuals: (1) Suspected PDAC and pancreatic precursor lesions are referred for hospital examination with diagnostic results collected; (2) Benign lesion cases receive personalized monitoring until endpoint events or study end; (3) Cases with positive AI findings but MDT-confirmed normal pancreatic issues receive at least one year of follow-up. If any abnormal results arise, management will transition to either plan (1) or (2). The primary outcome measures include pancreatic cancer detection rate, positive predictive value, consensus rate, and recall rate. Secondary outcome measures include the proportion of early-stage pancreatic cancers and resectable tumors. Safety indicators include the false positive rate, the proportion of unnecessary invasive procedures, and the proportion of unnecessary surgeries. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of AI-powered LDCT in detecting pancreatic cancer within a health check-up population, offering a practical solution to improve public health and early diagnosis for pancreatic cancer.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTDiagnostic Evaluation for Positive AI Findings

MDT will review positive AI findings (including PDAC, pancreatic precursor lesions and benign lesion) cases to determine next steps: (1) Suspected PDAC and pancreatic precursor lesions are referred for hospital examination with diagnostic results collected; (2) Benign lesion cases receive personalized monitoring until endpoint events or study end; (3) Cases with positive AI findings but MDT-confirmed normal pancreatic issues receive at least one year of follow-up. If any abnormal results arise, management will transition to either plan (1) or (2).

Sponsors

Ningbo University Affiliated People's Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Jiaxing University Affiliated Second Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Meinian Onehealth Healthcare Holdings Co., Ltd
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Ruici Medical Examination Institution
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Changhai Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 50 years and above. 2. Voluntary signing of informed consent. 3. Completion of LDCT examination.

Exclusion criteria

1. Previous history of pancreatic cancer. 2. Abdominal inflammation or diagnosis of acute pancreatitis within 6 months. 3. Poor image quality due to ascites, pancreatic trauma, thoracic/abdominal surgery, radiotherapy or chemotherapy. 4. Research subjects unable to complete follow-up due to physical or other reasons.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recall rate2 yearsThe proportion of individuals actually recalled among the total screened population.
Pancreatic cancer detection rate2 yearsThe proportion of individuals with abnormal AI assessment confirmed as pancreatic cancer or precancerous lesions among the total screened population
Consensus rate2 yearsThe proportion of individuals with abnormal AI assessment deemed suspicious for pancreatic cancer or precancerous lesions by MDT requiring recall among the total screened population.
Positive predictive value2 yearsThe proportion of individuals with abnormal AI assessment confirmed as pancreatic cancer or precancerous lesions among all individuals with abnormal AI assessment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Resectable pancreatic cancer proportion2 yearsThe proportion of individuals with surgically resectable pancreatic cancer among the total number of confirmed pancreatic cancer cases.
Early-stage pancreatic cancer proportion2 yearsThe proportion of individuals with abnormal AI assessment confirmed as early-stage pancreatic cancer among the total number of confirmed pancreatic cancer cases.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
False positive rate2 yearsThe proportion of individuals with abnormal AI assessment who actually have benign conditions or no lesions, among the total number of individuals with abnormal AI assessment.
Pancreatic cancer 5-year survival rate7 yearsThe proportion of pancreatic cancer patients detected by AI who are still alive after 5 years of follow-up, among the total number of pancreatic cancer patients detected by AI.
Unnecessary surgery proportion2 yearsThe proportion of individuals with abnormal AI assessment who underwent surgery but were confirmed to have benign lesions by postoperative pathology, among the total number of individuals with abnormal AI assessment.
Unnecessary invasive examination proportion2 yearsThe proportion of individuals with abnormal AI assessment who underwent invasive examinations but were found to have benign conditions or no lesions, among the total number of individuals with abnormal AI assessment.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactWang Bei Lei, M.D.
lilly_wang@126.com13774238083
Backup ContactGuo Shi Wei, M.D.
gestwa@163.com18621500666

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026