Skip to content

Comparison of Video Laryngoscopy and Conventional Laryngoscopy for Safe Intubation in Adult Thyroid Surgery Patients With Anticipated Difficult Airway

Comparison of Video Laryngoscopy Versus Conventional Laryngoscopy in Anticipated Difficult Intubation in Patients Undergoing Thyroid Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07113171
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-08-08
Start date
2023-11-18
Completion date
2024-05-18
Last updated
2025-08-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Difficult Airway Intubation, Airway Management During Operative Procedure

Keywords

Airway Management in Thyroid Surgery, Endotracheal Intubation Techniques, Video Laryngoscopy, Direct Laryngoscopy, Anesthesia in Thyroid Disorders

Brief summary

This clinical study is designed to compare two different techniques used for inserting a breathing tube (a process known as intubation) in adult patients undergoing thyroid surgery who are predicted to have a difficult airway. A difficult airway refers to a situation where it may be challenging to place the breathing tube due to specific anatomical or physical factors such as restricted neck movement, enlarged thyroid gland (goiter), reduced mouth opening, short neck, or increased soft tissue around the neck. The two techniques being assessed are conventional direct laryngoscopy, which is the traditional method requiring neck extension for a direct view of the windpipe, and video laryngoscopy, a modern approach that uses a camera to visualize the vocal cords on a screen with less need for neck manipulation. In this randomized controlled trial, a total of 60 patients meeting the eligibility criteria will be included and randomly assigned into two equal groups. One group will undergo intubation using the conventional laryngoscope, while the other group will be intubated using the video laryngoscope. The primary aim of this research is to evaluate which method provides a higher success rate of placing the endotracheal tube correctly on the first attempt. Additional outcomes that will be assessed include the total time taken for intubation, whether the intubation was ultimately successful regardless of the number of attempts, and the occurrence of any immediate injuries within the mouth or throat area during or after the procedure. The underlying hypothesis of the study is that video laryngoscopy will result in a significantly higher first-attempt intubation success rate as compared to conventional laryngoscopy in patients with predicted difficult airways. This study intends to provide clinically useful evidence to guide anesthesiologists in selecting the most effective and safe intubation technique for patients undergoing thyroid surgery, with the goal of minimizing complications and improving procedural outcomes.

Interventions

DEVICEConventional Direct Laryngoscope

The Macintosh laryngoscope blade was used for intubation. The technique involved neck extension to create a direct line of sight to the vocal cords for successful tracheal tube placement.

The video laryngoscope allowed visualization of the glottis on a monitor without the need for cervical extension, facilitating intubation in anticipated difficult airway cases.

Sponsors

Sheikh Zayed Medical College
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age from 18 to 60 years * Both genders will be included * Patients requiring endotracheal intubation under general anaesthesia for thyroid surgery. * Patients with anticipated difficult intubation based on the preoperative airway assessment. * Patients having ASA (American College of Anaesthesiologists) class 1 to 2.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients having neck injury * Patients having cervical spondylopathy * Patients requiring urgent/ emergency thyroid surgery * Patients with existing oropharyngeal or laryngeal abnormalities. * Patients with a history of severe cardiovascular or respiratory diseases.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
First-Attempt Intubation Success RateDuring intubation at the time of induction of anesthesia (Day 0, intraoperative)Successful placement of the endotracheal tube through the vocal cords into the trachea on the first attempt, confirmed by bilateral chest auscultation and capnography.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Intubation Success RateDuring intubation at the time of induction of anesthesia (Day 0, intraoperative)Successful tracheal intubation irrespective of the number of attempts required, verified by standard clinical confirmation methods (auscultation and capnography).
Intubation TimeDuring intubation at the time of induction of anesthesia (Day 0, intraoperative)The time taken from the insertion of the laryngoscope blade between the teeth to confirmation of successful tracheal tube placement. Measured in seconds using a stopwatch. This outcome reflects procedural efficiency between the two techniques.
Incidence of Immediate Oropharyngeal InjuriesImmediately post-intubation (within 5 minutes of tube placement, intraoperative)Presence or absence of visible soft tissue trauma, bleeding, or other oropharyngeal injuries observed immediately after intubation through visual inspection by the anesthesiologist.

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026