Skip to content

Interscalene and ıntertuberculary Pulsed Radiofrequency for Cervical Radiculopathy

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Cervical Root Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment at the Intertubercular and Interscalene Levels in the Treatment of Cervical Radicular Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07112300
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-08-08
Start date
2024-07-01
Completion date
2025-01-26
Last updated
2025-08-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Radicular Pain

Brief summary

This study examines the different application techniques of ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency treatment of cervical spinal nerves for cervical radicular pain. Patients with radiologic imaging findings of C5-C6-C7 disc protrusion or extrusion, with compatible clinical and physical examinations and who have undergone ultrasound-guided spinal cervical nerve radiofrequency treatment in our clinic will be evaluated. Patients' background information will be taken in their files and missing information will be completed by phone call. Pain scores at 3 and 6 months after the procedure will be recorded by scoring from 1 to 10. Patients will not undergo any interventional procedure for research purposes.

Interventions

PROCEDUREcervical nerve radiofrequency

Pulsed radiofrequency treatment is applied to the cervical 5-6-7 nerve roots defined under ultrasound guidance in the intertubercular or interscalene space by approaching the cervical 5-6-7 nerve roots with an inplane technique via a cannula electrode.

Sponsors

Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Radiologically proven extruded/protruded discopathy at C5/C6/C7 levels * Presence of radicular pain that can be provoked by physical examination * Consistent with radiologic imaging findings.

Exclusion criteria

* No surgical procedures in the cervical region * Concomitant pregnancy, malignancy, bleeding diathesis * Presence of rheumatologic diseases associated with concomitant chronic pain syndrome

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analouge Scalepretreatment, 3.- 6. monthsThe Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) measures pain intensity. The VAS consists of a 10cm line, with two end points representing 0 ('no pain') and 10 ('pain as bad as it could possibly be'). Ask the patient to rate their current level of pain by placing a mark on the line.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neck Disability Indexpretreatment, 6. monthsEach section is scored on a 0 to 5 rating scale, in which zero means 'No pain' and 5 means 'Worst imaginable pain'. Points summed to a total score.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026