Skip to content

Development and Prospective Validation of a Heterogeneous Treatment Effect-Based Decision Model for Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined With or Without Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Development and Prospective Validation of a Heterogeneous Treatment Effect-Based Decision Model for Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined With or Without Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07109336
Enrollment
236
Registered
2025-08-07
Start date
2025-08-01
Completion date
2026-08-30
Last updated
2026-09-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HCC - Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Brief summary

Unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) constitutes a significant health burden in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region, particularly in China, where it is frequently associated with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and diagnosed at advanced stages. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) remains the standard treatment for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), though its effectiveness diminishes in unresectable HCC (uHCC) with intermediate-to-high tumor burden. The IMbrave150 trial established atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atezo+Bev) as a superior alternative to sorafenib, demonstrating significant survival advantages in uHCC. Given the marked heterogeneity of intermediate-stage HCC, TACE may not benefit all patients equally. The TALENTACE study investigated on-demand TACE combined with Atezo+Bev versus TACE alone in treatment-naïve uHCC patients with intermediate-to-high tumor burden across China and Japan. Results revealed a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in the primary endpoint, TACE- progression-free survival (PFS), though overall survival (OS) remained immature at the time of analysis. This situation establishes a critical and unmet need for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) combined with extensive real-world evidence (RWE) to facilitate the assessment of individualized treatment heterogeneity and provide precise treatment recommendations in China and select Asia-Pacific regions.

Interventions

DEVICEHeterogeneous Treatment Effect-Based Decision Model

Heterogeneous Treatment Effect-Based Decision Model

Sponsors

Zhongda Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* • Aged≥18 years * Initiated first-line Atezo+Bev. * Eligible for TACE treatment or received at least one TACE within ±2 months of Atezo+Bev initiation (before Atezo+Bev start, anytime during Atezo+Bev therapy, or after Atezo+Bev discontinuation). * Clinically or pathologically diagnosed uHCC before or at the initiation of Atezo/Bev.The evidence of being diagnosed as "unresectable" may include but is not limited to below: "Unresectable" or "advanced" directly documented in the medical records History of extrahepatic metastasis as evidenced clinically or by radiology, histology or cytology OR China Liver Cancer (CNLC) Stage IIIb * At least one visit record after the initiation of Atezo+Bev * No prior systemic therapy for HCC, especially immunotherapy * No prior locoregional therapy to the target lesion(s) * At least one measurable untreated lesion * ECOG Performance Status of 0-2

Exclusion criteria

* • Evidence of extrahepatic spread (EHS) * Participating in interventional clinical trials. * Being a candidate for curative treatments * Any condition representing a contraindication to TACE as determined by the investigators * Active or history of autoimmune disease or immune deficiency * Untreated or incompletely treated esophageal and/or gastric varices with bleeding or high risk for bleeding * A prior bleeding event due to esophageal and/or gastric varices within 6 months prior to initiation of study treatment * Evidence of bleeding diathesis or significant coagulopathy * Missing critical baseline or outcome data

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall survivalFrom date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 24 monthsdefined as time from index date to death from any cause.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
TACE-PFSFrom index date to untreatable progression or TACE failure/refractoriness or any cause of death, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 10 monthsdefined as the time from index date to untreatable progression or TACE failure/refractoriness or any cause of death, whichever occurs first.
PFSFrom date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 10 monthsdefined as the time from index date to the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause (whichever occurs first), as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1 or mRECIST.
DoRFrom the first occurrence of a documented objective response to disease progression or death from any cause (whichever occurs first), assessed up to 10 monthsdefined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented objective response to disease progression or death from any cause (whichever occurs first).
TTPFrom index date to unTACE able progression or TACE failure/refractoriness (as defined above), assessed up to 10 monthsdefined as the time from index date to unTACE able progression or TACE failure/refractoriness (as defined above).
EHSFrom index date to the first evidence of Extrahepatic Spread, assessed up to 10 monthsdefined as the time from index date to the first evidence of Extrahepatic Spread.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 5, 2026