Skip to content

Antegrade Versus Retrograde Cross K-Wire In Distal Radius Fracture

Antegrade Versus Retrograde Cross K-Wire In Distal Radius Fracture; A Comparative Study

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07108543
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-08-07
Start date
2025-08-31
Completion date
2026-02-28
Last updated
2025-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Distal Radius Fractures

Brief summary

This study aims to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of distal radius fractures treated with cross K-wire fixation using the antegrade versus retrograde technique. Adult patients with extra-articular distal radius fractures will be randomly assigned to one of the two surgical approaches. The primary outcomes include fracture stability, functional recovery, and complication rates. The study is designed as a prospective, randomized controlled trial conducted at sohag university

Interventions

PROCEDUREAntegrade versus retrograde cross k-wire

\> Closed reduction of distal radius fracture followed by percutaneous insertion of two or more K-wires in an antegrade direction (from proximal to distal), crossing the fracture site under fluoroscopic guidance. The wires are introduced from the radial metaphysis and directed distally to stabilize the fracture.

Sponsors

Sohag University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

A randomized controlled trial using a parallel assignment model. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group A will undergo cross K-wire fixation using the antegrade technique, and Group B will undergo the retrograde technique. Outcomes will be compared between the two groups.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients with extra-articular distal radius fractures. Fractures classified as Frykmann type 1 and type 2. Patients aged 18 years and above.

Exclusion criteria

* Skeletally immature patient. * Intra-articular distal radius fractures. * Communited fractures. * Open fractures or fractures with neurovascular compromise. * Patients with fractures requiring surgical interventions other than K-wire fixation. * Patients with a history of infection or other conditions impair wound healing.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Radiological union of distal radius fractureAt 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperativelyRadiographic healing will be assessed using standard X-rays to evaluate union status. Radiographs will be reviewed for signs of cortical continuity and absence of fracture lines

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional outcome using DASH scoreAt 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperativelyDisabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire will be used to assess upper limb function
Pain level using Visual Analog Scale (VAS)At 1 week, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperativelyPain will be evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (0-10), with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating worst pain

Contacts

Primary ContactMontasser T Omar, resident
montassertalaat3@gmail.com01550793173
Backup ContactElshazly S Mousa, professer

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026