Skip to content

A Hybrid Psychological Intervention for Depression in Adolescents

Efficacy and Sustainability of a Hybrid Psychological Intervention Integrating Resilience Theory and the Satir Model on Depression, Resilience, and Quality of Life in Adolescents: A Multi-center, Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07104851
Enrollment
420
Registered
2025-08-05
Start date
2022-01-01
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2025-08-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adolescent Depression

Brief summary

This multi-center, randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and long-term effects of a novel hybrid psychological intervention, which combines Resilience Theory with the Satir Model, for adolescents diagnosed with depression. The study compared this intervention to treatment as usual (TAU) to determine its impact on depressive symptoms, psychological resilience, self-esteem, and overall quality of life.

Detailed description

Adolescent depression is a significant and growing public health concern. Traditional therapies have limitations, highlighting a need for innovative, engaging interventions. This study was designed to address this gap by developing and testing a hybrid model that integrates the strengths-based approach of Resilience Theory with the systemic, humanistic principles of the Satir Model. The study hypothesized that this combined intervention would be more effective than standard care in not only alleviating depressive symptoms but also in building lasting psychosocial resources. A total of 420 adolescents with depression were randomized to either the 12-week hybrid intervention group or a control group receiving treatment as usual. The intervention program was structured in three modules focusing on self-awareness, skill-building, and future-orientation. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, immediately post-intervention (12 weeks), and at a 6-month follow-up to evaluate the sustainability of the effects.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALResilience-Satir Hybrid Intervention

A structured, 12-week, group-based psychological intervention integrating principles from Resilience Theory and the Satir Model to enhance coping skills, self-esteem, communication, and family dynamics.

OTHERTreatment as Usual (TAU)

Standard care for adolescent depression, including pharmacotherapy and routine nursing support, without structured psychotherapy.

Sponsors

The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
13 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of a major depressive episode according to DSM-5 criteria, confirmed by two independent psychiatrists. * First episode, with a duration of 4 weeks to 12 months. * Age between 13 and 18 years. * HAMD-17 score ≥ 17. * Capable of normal communication. * Provision of informed consent by both the adolescent and legal guardians.

Exclusion criteria

* Lifetime diagnosis of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or other psychotic disorders. * Depression secondary to a general medical condition or substance use. * Acute suicidal risk (score ≥ 4 on MADRS item 10) requiring immediate intensive care. * Currently receiving structured psychotherapy. * Severe neurological or physical illness that could interfere with participation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17)Baseline, 12 weeks, 6-month follow-upA clinician-rated scale assessing the severity of depression. Total scores range from 0 to 52. A lower score indicates a better outcome.
Change in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)Baseline, 12 weeks, 6-month follow-upA clinician-rated scale sensitive to changes in core depressive symptoms. Total scores range from 0 to 60. A lower score indicates a better outcome.
Change in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)Baseline, 12 weeks, 6-month follow-upA 21-item self-report questionnaire assessing the severity of depression. A lower score indicates a better outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Medication Adherence as Measured by the Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS)Baseline, 12 weeks, 6-month follow-upA 10-item self-report scale assessing medication compliance behavior and attitudes. A higher score indicates better adherence.
Change in Family Function as Measured by the Family APGAR IndexBaseline, 12 weeks, 6-month follow-upA 5-item screening tool to assess an individual's perception of family function (Adaptation, Partnership, Growth, Affection, Resolve). A higher score indicates better family function.
Change in Psychological Resilience as Measured by the Resilience Scale for Chinese Adolescents (RSCA)Baseline, 12 weeks, 6-month follow-upA 27-item self-report scale assessing personal strength and support strength. A higher score indicates better resilience.
Change in Quality of Life as Measured by the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF)Baseline, 12 weeks, 6-month follow-upA 26-item self-report a measure assessing quality of life across four domains: physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment. Higher scores indicate a better quality of life.
Change in Social Support as Measured by the Perceived Social Support Scale (PSSS)Baseline, 12 weeks, 6-month follow-upA 12-item scale measuring perceived support from family, friends, and significant others. A higher score indicates better perceived social support.
Change in Self-Esteem as Measured by the Feelings of Inferiority Scale (FIS)Baseline, 12 weeks, 6-month follow-upA 36-item self-report scale measuring self-esteem. A higher score indicates higher self-esteem and a better outcome.
Change in Coping Styles as Measured by the Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ)Baseline, 12 weeks, 6-month follow-upA 20-item self-report measure assessing positive and negative coping styles. An increase in the positive coping subscale score indicates a better outcome.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026