Skip to content

Non-intubated Versus Intubated Anesthesia in Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer

Efficacy and Safety of Non-intubated Versus Intubated Anesthesia in Thoracoscopic Radical Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07104838
Enrollment
500
Registered
2025-08-05
Start date
2025-10-01
Completion date
2026-12-01
Last updated
2025-09-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Esophageal Cancer (EsC)

Brief summary

This is a prospective, single-center, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the perioperative safety and feasibility of non-intubated spontaneous ventilation anesthesia (NIV) compared to conventional intubated mechanical ventilation anesthesia (IMV) in patients undergoing thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. The study will be conducted at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University and aims to assess whether the non-intubated approach can offer comparable or better outcomes in terms of intraoperative and postoperative complications, anesthetic drug consumption, recovery parameters, and overall postoperative rehabilitation. Eligible patients aged 18 to 75 years with resectable middle or lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma (stage I-III) will be randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either NIV using a laryngeal mask airway or IMV with a double-lumen endotracheal tube. Both groups will undergo the same thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgical procedures, and anesthesia will be managed with standardized protocols. The primary outcome is the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications, including hypoxemia, hypercapnia, respiratory failure, and the need for conversion to intubation. Secondary outcomes include anesthetic drug dosage, intraoperative hemodynamic stability, postoperative pain scores, time to ambulation, length of hospital stay, and 30-day readmission rate. This trial complies with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to enrollment.

Interventions

Non-intubated spontaneous ventilation anesthesia

Sponsors

The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 18 and 75 years * Diagnosed with resectable middle or lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma (clinical stage I-III) * Scheduled to undergo thoracoscopic esophagectomy * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≤ III * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 1 * Preoperative pulmonary function test with FEV₁ ≥ 50% predicted * Written informed consent obtained

Exclusion criteria

* Severe risk of aspiration due to reflux, gastric retention, or hiatal hernia * Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m² * Extensive pleural adhesions discovered preoperatively * History of upper thoracic or intrathoracic surgery * Pregnancy or lactation * Known allergy or intolerance to anesthetic agents

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complicationsFrom anesthesia induction to 30 days postoperativelyComposite incidence of complications occurring intraoperatively or within 30 days after surgery, including hypoxemia (SpO₂ \< 90% for \>1 minute), hypercapnia (PaCO₂ ≥ 65 mmHg), conversion to intubation (in the non-intubated group), severe arrhythmia, hemodynamic instability, postoperative pulmonary infection, anastomotic leakage, bleeding, pneumothorax, respiratory failure, and reintubation.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026