Skip to content

The Effects of Static Versus Dynamic Exercises on Balance and Activity Balance Confidence In The Elderly Population With Locomotive Syndrome

A Comparative Study on The Effects of Static Versus Dynamic Exercises on Balance and Activity Balance Confidence In The Elderly Population With Locomotive Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07104747
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-08-05
Start date
2025-02-08
Completion date
2025-05-28
Last updated
2025-08-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Locomotive Syndrome

Brief summary

This research aimed to explore the comparative effects of static and dynamic balance training on postural stability and activity-specific balance confidence among elderly individuals diagnosed with locomotive syndrome. A single-blinded, randomized clinical trial was conducted at a shelter home, where thirty participants between the ages of 60 and 75 were randomly assigned to two intervention groups. One group received static balance exercises, while the other group engaged in dynamic balance training. Both interventions were delivered three times per week over a six-week period. Standardized assessment tools, including the Y-Balance Test and the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale, were used to evaluate outcomes related to balance and self- perceived confidence in performing daily activities. The study was designed to determine the more effective approach for enhancing mobility and promoting independence in the elderly population affected by locomotive syndrome.

Interventions

PROCEDUREStatic Exercise Intervention

Static exercises generally involve maintaining a fixed position without movement-such as standing on one leg or holding a specific posture-emphasizing isometric muscle control and stability.

PROCEDURE(Dynamic Exercises Group

Dynamic exercises were structured across three progressive stages-basic, moderate, and advanced-each increasing in complexity and difficulty. These exercises were performed in various positions, including sitting, standing, and walking.

Sponsors

University of Faisalabad
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Able to walk independently People with locomotive syndrome Can be able to perform exercise and listen to the therapist

Exclusion criteria

* Any mental illness Any systemic Illness

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Y balance test6 weeksY Balance Test larger reach distances and higher symmetry between limbs reflect greater dynamic balance and functional capacity

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Activity balance confidence6 weeksActivity-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale higher scores suggest an enhancement in patient confidence regarding balance in a range of daily activities

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026