Skip to content

Freeze-dried Bone Allograft vs Autologous Bone Blocks in the Lateral Augmentation of the Jaws

Comparison of Freeze-dried Bone Allograft and Autogenous Bone Blocks in the Surgical Reconstruction of Horizontally Atrophied Jaws for Implant Placement: Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07104370
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-08-05
Start date
2025-09-29
Completion date
2033-09-01
Last updated
2025-10-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Edentulous Alveolar Ridge, Edentulous Alveolar Ridge Atrophy

Keywords

autologous bone, retromolar area, bone block, bone augmentation, dental implant, freeze-dried bone allograft

Brief summary

After tooth loss, the alveolar ridge undergoes various modeling and remodeling processes, resulting in overall bone resorption. In case of extensive alveolar atrophy, bone volume must be restored before or during implant placement to achieve successful dental rehabilitation and maximize implant survival and success rates. One possible method for reconstructing severe bone resorption is block bone augmentation. Due to its biological properties, autologous bone is considered the gold standard among bone graft materials, as it possesses osteoinductive, osteoconductive, and osteogenic properties. The advantages of using allografts over autologous bone grafts include reduced postoperative morbidity, decreased surgical time, and the absence of anatomical limitations regarding the amount of bone that can be harvested. The disadvantage of allografts is the loss of viable osteogenic cells and osteoinductive factors during processing. The aim of the study is: * to compare the success of the bone augmentation surgery depending on whether freeze-dried bone allograft blocks or autologous bone blocks are used, * compare the microarchitecture of the augmented bone depending on the bone graft material applied, * to evaluate the success of dental implants placed in the augmented bone and that of the prostheses delivered on the dental implants.

Interventions

PROCEDUREBone augmentation using an autologous bone block

* Under local anesthesia, a crestal and mesial releasing incision is made, followed by preparation of a full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap. * In the control group, an autologous bone block graft is harvested from the retromolar donor area using rotary instruments and piezoelectric surgery. * The block is fixed to the recipient site with two screws. * The flap is mobilized, and the wound is closed tension-free with mattress and simple interrupted sutures. * Sutures are removed two weeks postoperatively. * All patients receive therapeutic-dose antibiotics: amoxicillin and clavulanic acid 2x1 for one week. In the case of an amoxicillin allergy, clindamycin 4x1 for seven days is administered. Non-steroid anti-inflammatory treatment with diclofenac 3x1 is also provided. * Patients do not wear temporary prostheses during the healing period.

PROCEDUREBone augmentation using freeze-dried allograft block

* Under local anesthesia, a crestal and mesial releasing incision is made, followed by preparation of a full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap. * In the test group, a freeze-dried allograft bone block is prepared to the required size using rotary instruments. * The block is fixed to the recipient site with two screws. * The flap is mobilized, and the wound is closed tension-free with mattress and simple interrupted sutures. * Sutures are removed two weeks postoperatively. * All patients receive therapeutic-dose antibiotics: amoxicillin and clavulanic acid 2x1 for one week. In case of amoxicillin allergy, clindamycin 4x1 for seven days is administered. Non-steroid anti-inflammatory treatment with diclofenac 3x1 is also provided. * Patients do not wear temporary prostheses during the healing period.

• Preoperatively, a CBCT scan is performed to assess inflammatory and other pathological changes and anatomical variations in the dentomaxillofacial region.

Postoperatively, a CBCT scan is performed to assess bone quantity and quality before implantation.

PROCEDUREDental implant placement

Following the 3-month-long healing period following bone augmentation, dental implants are placed non-submerged in the augmented bone under local anaesthesia.

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTBone core biopsy

At the time of dental implant placement, a rotary instrument is used to harvest a bone core biopsy sample from the augmented bone. The bone core biopsy samples are subjected to histomorphometric and microCT analysis.

After 3 months of dental implant placement, fixed dental prosthesis are delivered on the dental implants.

Freeze-dried bone allograft block

Sponsors

Semmelweis University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* over 18 years old * require lateral augmentation for implant rehabilitation

Exclusion criteria

* Smoking * Pregnancy * Poor oral hygiene * Failure to attend follow-up visits * Therapeutic-dose irradiation to the head and neck region * Local bone tumors, cysts, or inflammatory processes * Decompensated systemic diseases contraindicate surgery * Use of medications affecting bone metabolism (steroids, antiresorptive medications such as bisphosphonates, RANKL inhibitor antibodies, VEGF antagonists) * Psychiatric disorders contraindicate implant rehabilitation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Success of the bone augmentation3 monthsThe bone augmentation surgery is successful if no inflammatory complications occur in the 3-month healing period and the bone volume is sufficient for dental implant placement.
Success of the dental implants3 monthsAccording to The International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference. I. Success (optimum health) 1. No pain or tenderness upon function 2. 0 mobility 3. Less than 2 mm radiographic bone loss from initial surgery 4. No exudates in the patient's history II. Satisfactory survival 1. No pain on function 2. 0 mobility 3. 2-4 mm radiographic bone loss 4. No exudates in the patient's history III. Compromised survival 1. May have sensitivity to the function 2. No mobility 3. Radiographic bone loss of more than 4 mm (less than1/2 of the length of the implant body) 4. Probing depth more than 7 mm 5. May have exudates in the patient's history IV. Failure (clinical or absolute failure) Any of the following: 1. Pain on function 2. Mobility 3. Radiographic bone loss of more than 1/2 the length of the implant 4. Uncontrolled exudate 5. Implant no longer in the mouth
Success of the implant-borne prostheses5 yearsProstheses with four or fewer complications (screw loosening, decementation, chipping) that could be treated chairside.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Value of the percent bone volume (BV/TV) calculated from the microCT reconstructions of the bone core biopsy samples3-6 monthsRelative volume of calcified tissue in the selected volume. Unit: none
Value of the bone surface to volume ratio (BS/TV), calculated from the microCT reconstructions of the bone core biopsy samples3-6 monthsRatio of the segmented bone surface to the total volume in the region of interest. Unit: 1/mm
Value of the trabecular thickness (Tb.Th.) calculated from the microCT reconstructions of the bone core biopsy samples.3-6 monthsMean thickness of the trabeculae, assessed using direct 3D methods. Unit: mm.
Value of the trabecular separation (Tb.Sp.), calculated from the microCT reconstructions of the bone core biopsy samples.3-6 monthsMean distance between the trabeculae, assessed using direct 3D methods. Unit: mm.
Hisomorphometry: Percent of residual bone graft particles3-6 monthsThe percentage of residual bone graft particle area measured on the representative sections prepared from the bone core biopsy samples. Unit: percent (%)
Value of the structure model index (SMI), calculated from the microCT reconstructions of the bone core biopsy samples.3-6 monthsThe estimator of the plate-versus rod-like characteristic of the trabecular bone structure, 0 for perfect plates, 3 for perfect rods, and 4 for perfect spheres. Unit: none.
Value of the Total porosity (Po(tot)), calculated from the microCT reconstructions of the bone core biopsy samples.3-6 monthsPercent porosity is the volume of pores as a percent of the total volume of interest (VOI). Unit: percent (%).
Value of the Connectivity (Conn), calculated from the microCT reconstructions of the bone core biopsy samples.3-6 monthsOne useful and fast algorithm for calculating the Euler connectivity in 3D is the Conneulor. It measures what might be called redundant connectivity, the degree to which parts of the object are multiply connected. It is a measure of how many connections in a structure can be severed before the structure falls into two separate pieces. Unit: none.
Value of the trabecular bone pattern factor (Tb.Pf), derived from microCT reconstructions of bone core biopsy samples.3-6 monthsAn indicator of the relation between convex and concave elements in the trabecular bone structure. Tb.Pf \<0 when the trabecular bone is honeycomb-like and increases as the trabecular bone acquires a rod-like structure. Unit: none.
Hisomorphometry: Percent of newly formed bone3-6 monthsThe percentage of newly formed bone area is measured on the representative sections prepared from the bone core biopsy samples. Unit: percent (%).
Hisomorphometry: Percent of bone marrow3-6 monthsThe percentage of bone marrow area measured on the representative sections prepared from the bone core biopsy samples. Unit: percent (%)

Countries

Hungary

Contacts

Primary ContactCsilla Szerencse, DMD, MDS
szerencse.csilla@semmelweis.hu003614591500
Backup ContactMárton Kivovics, DMD, MDS, PHD
kivovics.marton@semmelweis.hu003614591500

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026