Skip to content

Influence of Antiseptic Washes on Wound Healing Complications After THA

Comparison of Wound Healing Complications After Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Povidone-iodine or Chlorhexidine as Antiseptic Wash

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07104084
Enrollment
420
Registered
2025-08-05
Start date
2025-10-09
Completion date
2028-01-01
Last updated
2026-02-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Avascular Necrosis of Femur Head, Hip Osteoarthritis

Brief summary

The purpose of this research trial is to evaluate the effect of two types of washing solutions on wound healing after total hip replacement surgery. Washing solutions are used routinely during total hip replacements to clean the wound after the components have been placed and the wound is about to be closed with sutures. It is currently not known which washing solution may be better for wound healing and whether a certain solution decreases the risk of wound healing complications after total hip replacement. Therefore, this research trial is being conducted. Study participants will be randomized into one of two groups: washing the surgical wound with povidone-iodine solution (Surgiphor, Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) or chlorhexidine solution (Irrisept, Irrimax Corporation, Lawrenceville, GA). All patients will undergo standard of care total hip replacements without any other change in surgery. The best type of solution that cleans the wound and potentially leads to better wound healing is unknown. This study will evaluate whether there is difference in surgical wound healing between the two washing solutions. The study will pay for the washing solutions. Patients will follow up for standard postoperative visits. At the 2-week and 6-week visits, pictures of the surgical incision will be taken and saved in the electronic medical record and evaluated in a standardized way for healing of the incision and the appearance of the scar. Postoperative complications and returns to the hospital or additional surgeries will be collected from the electronic medical record.

Detailed description

Study participants will be randomized into one of two groups: washing the surgical wound with povidone-iodine solution (Surgiphor, Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) or chlorhexidine solution (Irrisept, Irrimax Corporation, Lawrenceville, GA). All patients will undergo standard of care total hip replacements without any other change in surgery. The best type of solution that cleans the wound and potentially leads to better wound healing is unknown. This study will evaluate whether there is difference in surgical wound healing between the two washing solutions. Patients will follow up for standard postoperative visits. At the 2-week and 6-week visits, pictures of the surgical incision will be taken and saved in the electronic medical record and evaluated in a standardized way for healing of the incision and the appearance of the scar. Postoperative complications and returns to the hospital or additional surgeries will be collected from the electronic medical record.

Interventions

DEVICElavage chlorhexidine

Patient will receive a chlorhexidine lavage for 3 minutes following total hip component placement followed by saline lavage.

DEVICElavage povidone-iodine

Patient will receive povidone-iodine lavage for 3 minutes following total hip component placement followed by saline lavage.

Sponsors

F. Johannes Plate
Lead SponsorOTHER
Irrimax Corporation
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* osteoarthritis or avascular necrosis of the femoral head, failed conservative management, indicated for total hip replacement

Exclusion criteria

* reported or documented allergy to chlorhexidine or povidone-iodine

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale2 weeks and 6 weeks postopThe observer scale of the POSAS consists of six items (vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability and surface area). All items are scored on a scale ranging from 1 ('like normal skin') to 10 ('worst scar imaginable'). The sum of the six items results in a total score of the POSAS observer scale. Categories boxes are added for each item. Furthermore, an overall opinion is scored on a scale ranging from 1 to 10. All parameters should preferably be compared to normal skin on a comparable anatomic location

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
wound healing complicationsup to 90 days from surgerydrainage, dehiscence, suture abscess
Revisionup to 90 days from surgeryRevision surgery, readmission

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTFrank J Plate, MD, PhD
platefj2@upmc.edu(412) 687-3900
CONTACTDana Farrell, BS,PMP
djf52@pitt.edu(412) 383-0955
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORFrank J Plate, MD, PhD

University of Pittsburgh

STUDY_DIRECTORFrank J Plate, MD, PhD

University of Pittsburgh

STUDY_CHAIRFrank J Plate, MD, PhD

University of Pittsburgh

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026