Skip to content

i-NEED: NEw migrainE Drugs Database

Italian Real-life Multicenter Observational Study on Efficacy, Tolerability, and Safety of Innovative Drugs (Monoclonal Antibodies, Gepants, Ditans, Sumatriptan-naproxen) for Preventive or Acute Migraine Treatment.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07103694
Acronym
i-NEED
Enrollment
2641
Registered
2025-08-05
Start date
2022-03-24
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2026-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Migraine, Episodic Migraine, Medication Overuse Headache

Keywords

migraine, anti-CGRP monoclonal antobodies, gepants, ditans, sumatriptan and naproxen combination

Brief summary

Approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicine Agency (EMA) starting in 2018, anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP mAbs) represent the first true revolution in the preventive treatment of migraine due to their selectivity and specificity. To date, four anti-CGRP mAbs have been developed for the preventive treatment of migraine: eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab.Anti-CGRP mAbs constitute not only the first specific and selective treatment for the prevention of migraine but also the most extensively studied pharmacological category in this field, considering the vast and complex populations examined. The clinical effects of the various mAbs are substantially comparable and are characterized by several fundamental aspects: * High efficacy in both episodic and chronic migraine, with the presence of super-responders who experience a reduction in the average monthly number of migraine days of \>75% (or even 100%) compared to before treatment. * Efficacy that is independent of the clinical form of migraine - with or without aura - and regardless of whether there is analgesic overuse. * Efficacy maintained even in the presence of depressive or anxious comorbidities. * Rapid onset of action (even more pronounced with eptinezumab), with the therapeutic effect appearing within the first week in most cases. * Excellent tolerability with an absence of class-specific adverse events. * Outstanding treatment adherence and a very low rate of treatment discontinuation in the long term. It should also be noted that the development of anti-drug antibodies or neutralizing antibodies to anti-CGRP mAbs is rare and does not significantly impact the efficacy or tolerability of treatment. Future clinical practice will need to clarify several additional aspects, such as: 1) whether treatment with anti-CGRP mAbs can modify the course of migraine; 2) the appropriate approach regarding any traditional preventive treatment (whether to continue or discontinue it); 3) the definition of the characteristics of non-responders; 4) the definition of patients with a delayed response to treatment. Gepants are oral antagonists of the CGRP receptor. Among the four gepants synthesized so far (atogepant, rimegepant, ubrogepant, zavegepant), atogepant and rimegepant are currently available in Italy. Atogepant has proven to be an effective and well-tolerated option for the prevention of episodic and chronic migraines. Rimegepant is effective for both acute treatment and prevention of migraines, with a favorable safety profile and flexible oral administration. Lasmiditan is the first ditan effective for migraine attack and it represents a new therapeutic option for patients with contraindications to triptans, due to the presence of vascular risk factors, or for patients who experience undesirable side effects with these, thus increasing the therapeutic possibilities for the symptomatic treatment of migraine. The combination of sumatriptan 85 mg and naproxen sodium 500 mg is indicated for the acute treatment of migraine attacks in adult patients for whom sumatriptan monotherapy is insufficient.

Detailed description

The European Headache Federation has published detailed guidelines on the state of the art regarding evidence of effectiveness in reducing the frequency and intensity of headache episodes, as well as the safety and tolerability of the four monoclonal antibodies under "ideal" experimental conditions, with patients selected based on stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria. This selection limits the direct transferability of the conclusions of these studies to clinical reality. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate, in a clinical practice setting, the real effectiveness in reducing the monthly frequency of migraine days and the tolerability and efficacy of monoclonal antibodies in a real-world evidence context. The study may later include all drugs that become available for this condition, subject to authorization by the competent Italian authority. The present extension of the I-NEED study aims to integrate the collection and evaluation of real-life data on anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies for migraine prophylaxis with the study of efficacy, safety, and tolerability-also in a real-world evidence context-of gepants in the prophylaxis of episodic and chronic migraine, and of rimegepant, ditans, and the sumatriptan-naproxen combination in the acute treatment of migraine.

Interventions

DRUGanti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies

erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, eptinezumab

DRUGgepants

atogepant, rimegepant

DRUGcombination of sumatriptan and naproxen

combination of sumatriptan and naproxen

DRUGditan

lasmiditan

Sponsors

IRCCS San Raffaele Roma
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age more or equal 18 years; * Males and females; * Willingness to sign the informed consent; * Episodic migraine for the use of drug indicated for migraine attack * High frequency episodic migraine, at least 8 days per month of disabling migraine in the past 3 months; * Chronic migraine, according to the ICHD-III criteria;

Exclusion criteria

* Other headaches different than migraine; * Known intolerance to the eccipients; * Vascular disease or Raynaud.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
effectiveness of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxisthe assessment will be conducted at 4 weeks from treatment initiationreduction in the number of monthly migraine days compared to the baseline average recorded in the three months preceding treatment
effectiveness of innovative drug as migraine prophylaxisthe assessment will be conducted at 12 weeks from treatment initiationreduction in the number of monthly migraine days compared to the baseline average recorded in the three months preceding treatment
2 hour-pain freedom2 hoursPercentage of patients reporting complete pain relief within 2 hours after taking the innovative drug for migraine attack

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
safety and tolerability of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxisthe assessment will be conducted at 48 weeks from treatment initiationtype and number of adverse events occurring during the study period (event details, duration, severity and action taken)
impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on symptomatic medication use and medication overuse headachethe assessment will be conducted at 48 weeks from treatment initiationreduction in the average monthly consumption of analgesics in patients undergoing treatment with innovative drugs
impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on migraine symptomsthe assessment will be conducted at 4 weeks from treatment initiationmean change in perceived pain intensity during a migraine attack (measured using the Numerical Rating Scale, score range 0-10) compared to the pre-treatment period
impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on migraine-related disabilitythe assessment will be conducted at 4 weeks from treatment initiationmean change in Headache Impact Test 6-TM scores (score range 36-78) before treatment
impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on interictal disabilitythe assessment will be conducted at 4 weeks from treatment initiationMean change in Migraine Interictal Burden Scale-4 (score range: 0-12)
impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on work-related difficulties due to migrainethe assessment will be conducted at 12 weeks from treatment initiationmean change in the HEADWORK questionnaire score (two sections: the first one includes 13 items and the second one 12 items: every item requires a five point response scale ranging between 1-"no difficulty"-, 5 - "I cannot do it")
impact of innovatine drugs as migraine prophylaxis on work-related difficulties due to migrainethe assessment will be conducted at 48 weeks from treatment initiationmean change in the HEADWORK questionnaire score (two sections: the first one includes 13 items and the second one 12 items: every item requires a five point response scale ranging between 1-"no difficulty"-, 5 - "I cannot do it")
impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on economic resources in migrainethe assessment will be conducted at 12 weeks from treatment initiationmean change in the COSTI questionnaire score (evaluation of both direct and indirect cost directly gathered from patients)
patient subjective perceptionthe assessment will be conducted at 4 weeks from treatment initiationcollection of subjective feedback from the patients regarding their experience with the medication, assessing patient satisfaction, ease of use of the medication perceived effectiveness with Patient Global Impression of Change (score range 1-7)
response rates to innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxisthe assessment will be conducted at 4 weeks from treatment initiationpercentage of patients achieving a \>50% reduction in monthly migraine days compared to the pre-treatment period
1 hour-pain freedom1 hour after taking the innovative drug for migraine attackPercentage of patients reporting complete pain relief within 1 hour after taking the innovative drug for migraine attack
2 hours-pain relief2 hours after taking the innovative drug for migraine attackpercentage of patients reporting a 50% reduction in pain intensity wiithin 2 hours after taking the innovative drug for migraine attack
disappearance of Most Bothersone Symptom2 hours after taking the innovative drug for migraine attackpercentage of patients experiencing the disappearence of the Most Bothersone Symptom (the most disabling by the patient) within wiithin 2 hours after taking the innovative drug for migraine attack
presence or absence of associated symptoms (nausea, vomiting, photophobia, phonophobia)1-48 hours after taking the innovative drug for migraine attackpresence or absence of associated symptoms (nausea, vomiting, photophobia, phonophobia) at predefined time intervals of 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours
24 hour-sustained pain freedom24 hours after taking the innovative drug for migraine attackpercentage of patients experiencing complete pain relief within 2 hours after taking the innovative drug for migraine attack
24 hour-sustained pain relief24 hours after taking the innovative drug for migraine attackpercentage of patients experiencing a 50% reduction in pain intensity within 2 hours after taking the innovative drug for migraine attack
headache recurrence2 hours after taking the innovative drug for migraine attackdefinition of the moment of possible migraine pain recurrence (headache recurernce), as well as its intensity within 24 and 48 hours following the administration of the medication (limited to patients who experienced pain freedom within 2 hours)
use of rescue medication24 hours after taking the innovative drug for migraine attackuse of rescue medication and evaluation of the time interval between the first and the second dose
adverse occurence0-48 hours after taking the innovative drug for migraine attackdefinition of the type and number of adverse events occurring within 48 hours of taking the innovative drug for migraine attack (event details, duration, severity and action taken)

Countries

Italy

Contacts

CONTACTPiero Barbanti, MD, PhD
piero.barbanti@sanraffaele.it+390652254318
CONTACTCinzia Aurilia
cinzia.aurilia@sanraffaele.it+390652254318

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 12, 2026