Skip to content

Sagittal Split Plate Versus Two Miniplates in the Treatment of Mandibular Angle Fractures

New Design Sagittal Split Plate Versus Two Miniplates in the Treatment of Mandibular Angle Fractures (Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07103590
Enrollment
16
Registered
2025-08-05
Start date
2025-07-16
Completion date
2025-12-01
Last updated
2025-08-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mandible Fracture

Brief summary

Mandibular fractures are the second most common maxillofacial fracture after nasal bone fracture. As a result, a lot of research work has gone into improving treatment methods for these fractures including, reduction of immobilization period and enhancement of rigid fixation. One of these modalities is the use of Sagittal Split plate at the angle of the mandible.

Interventions

PROCEDUREsingle Sagittal Split plate

patients will be treated using a single Sagittal Split plate at the neutral zone of mandible

patients will be treated using two conventional miniplates according to Champy's osteosynthesis lines.

Sponsors

Alexandria University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients suffering from recent, uninfected angle mandibular fracture. * Fracture that demands open reduction and internal fixation.

Exclusion criteria

* Medically compromised patients contradicting the operation. * Existence of infection at the fracture line. * Pathological fracture. * An old fracture.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in pain scoresbaseline, 24 hours, 1 week, and 6 weeksWill be assessed through a 10-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (34). (0-1= None, 2-4= Mild, 5-7= Moderate, 8-10= Severe).
Change in Maximal Inter-Incisal Mouthbaseline, 24 hours, 1 week, and 6 weeksUsing a millimeter ruler to measure maximal inter-incisal mouth opening

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
postoperative infection24 hours, 1 week, and 6 weeksobservation for any manifestations of wound healing disturbance
change in bone densitybaseline and 12 weeksImmediate CT (T0) scan will be done and then another CT (T1) will be taken at 12th week to estimate the mean bone density at the fracture line in comparison with the immediate postoperative scan

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactPeter Naeem El Masry, BDS
peternaderelmasry@gmail.com0 12 87142534

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 10, 2026