Skip to content

Developing a New LIFU Neuromodulation Method to Suppress Tremor

Developing a New Low-intensity Focused Ultrasound (LIFU) Neuromodulation Method to Suppress Tremor

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07103265
Enrollment
20
Registered
2025-08-05
Start date
2025-09-15
Completion date
2027-07-15
Last updated
2025-08-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Essential Tremor

Brief summary

The investigators aim to apply low intensity focused ultrasound neuromodulation to patients with essential tremor to evaluate the efficacy of this intervention in reducing the amplitude of hand tremor compared to sham stimulation.

Detailed description

Transcranial ultrasound stimulation is a non-invasive brain stimulation that uses low intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) to modulate neural activity with high spatial precision (Zadeh et al., 2024). Several human and animal studies have demonstrated that LIFU can produce lasting neuromodulatory effects, including both excitatory and inhibitory responses in the primary motor cortex (Zadeh et al., 2024). Furthermore, evidence suggests that LIFU is capable of inducing plasticity in the human brain that resembles long term potentiation or long-term depression (Zeng et al., 2024). The ability of LIFU to induce bidirectional effects, either excitatory or inhibitory, depending on sonication parameters, offers a level of flexibility in tailoring neuromodulatory interventions to individual patient needs and specific neural circuit dysfunctions. Combined with real-time neuronavigation and acoustic modeling tools, LIFU provides a promising platform for precise, personalized, and non-invasive brain stimulation. The modulatory effect of LIFU depends on sonication parameters such as frequency, attenuation, and pulse repetition frequency (Zeng et al., 2024; Manuel et al., 2020), and evidence from both preclinical and clinical studies suggests these effects can persist beyond the stimulation period consistent with long-term potentiation or long-term depression-like plasticity mechanisms (Fomenko et al., 2020; Zadeh et al., 2024). Unlike other neuromodulatory techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation, LIFU offers the unique capability to reach deep brain structures while maintaining a focal spatial resolution. This advantage of precise targeting of deep brain regions such as the thalamus without the need for surgical intervention make LIFU a highly useful modality for investigating disorders (Legon et al., 2018). Structures like the ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim) of the thalamus, commonly implicated in movement disorders such as essential tremor and Parkinson's disease, can be non-invasively stimulated using LIFU to modulate aberrant neural activity. In a previous study, we piloted an ultrasound transducer integrated with standard optical tracking-based neuro-navigation to establish a safety and tolerability benchmark for LIFU to reduce tremor in patients with Essential Tremor or Parkinson's disease, while also optimizing stimulation parameters prior to broader clinical application. Our open label study, currently under review for publication, demonstrated high efficacy and safety of our system to transiently reduce, in the short term, tremor amplitude measured using accelerometric recordings. By integrating rigorous screening, controlled stimulation parameters, and standardized monitoring protocols, we propose here a randomized sham-controlled study to advance knowledge on efficacy and safety of this technology in a larger clinical sample of patients with these diagnoses. As LIFU continues to expand into therapeutic realms, such foundational research will be essential for supporting its evidence-based integration into neuroscience and medicine. Objectives. AIM: To determine if we can low intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU, a neuromodulatory form of ultrasound) in the laboratory setting can transiently suppress tremor when targeting motor thalamus in patients with tremor. HYPOTHESIS: Specific LIFU patterns applied to deep thalamic targets will transiently induce reduce tremor in patients with tremor. IMPACT: If successful, we could use LIFU to help predict potential efficacy of permanent lesioning on tremor as well as support further investigation of LIFU as a novel non-invasive neuromodulation strategy for tremor.

Interventions

Parameters Range of values Fundamental frequency 250 kHz Transducer diameter 15 cm Focal distance 13.5 cm (steerable +/- 5-10 mm from the center) Pulse repetition frequency 100 Hz Duty cycle 10% Duration 2 min for each of the 7 foci Peak spatial intensity (Isppa) 10.0 W/cm2 Peak temporal average intensity (Ispta) 1.2 W/cm2 Mechanical index (MI) 0.48 \* Thermal index (TI) 0.8oC \*\*

DEVICESham stimulation

Same set-up as for real stimulation but with without delivering any ultrasound stimulation

Sponsors

University of Calgary
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

We use an in-house developed focused ultrasound system that uses a 128-element phased array transducer (diameter of 135 mm, F#=0.8) operating at 700 kHz and mounted on a specialized arm for stereotactic neuronavigation. Patients will be seated comfortably in a chair equipped with neuronavigation (BrainSight, Rogue) positioning the custom transcranial ultrasound (TUS) array. The TUS array will be applied to the scalp, with ultrasound gel applied, and held in place using the neuronavigation arm. The control session will have the same duration of the real stimulation session, i.e., it will be divided in two 40-minutes long rounds. During the first round, participants will receive sham stimulation which is unfocused, thereby providing the same sound but without sufficient intensity at any location. After the break, during the second round participants will receive TUS stimulation at the same energy parameters as in the real stimulation session but positioning the focus in the CSF space.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

• Diagnosis of Essential Tremor OR Diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of any neurological diagnosis other than Essential Tremor and Parkinson's Disease * Family history of Essential Tremor OR Parkinson's Disease * Inability to undergo MRI or attend to the experimental study sessions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in power spectral density (PSD) of tremor accelerometric trace between post-sonication (Round 1) and baseline5 minutesThis outcome will be measured using triaxial accelerometry performed on the participants' index finger (treated side). Accelerometry will be analyzed by summing traces from each axis, after using Welch's method to calculate the power spectral density (PSD), with 3-7 Hz tremor frequency range selected for the area under the curve and transformed into logarithmic scale to account for the variability in tremor amplitude at baseline. The primary endpoint will be the percent change in PSD between the post-sonication recording after the 1st Round of the session and the baseline recording.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in power spectral density (PSD) of tremor accelerometric trace between post-sonication (Round 2) and baseline5 minutesThis outcome will be measured using triaxial accelerometry performed on the participants' index finger (treated side). Accelerometry will be analyzed by summing traces from each axis, after using Welch's method to calculate the power spectral density (PSD), with 3-7 Hz tremor frequency range selected for the area under the curve and transformed into logarithmic scale to account for the variability in tremor amplitude at baseline. The primary endpoint will be the percent change in PSD between the post-sonication recording after the 2nd Round of the session and the baseline recording.
Change in Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor sub-score corresponding to the sum of scale items related to the treated side between the post-sonication rating and the baseline rating (participants with ET)5 minutesThis applies only to participants with a diagnosis of Essential Tremor
Change in the Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale sub-score corresponding to the sum of resting tremor items of the scale between the post-sonication rating and the baseline rating (participants with PD).5 minutesThis applies only to participants with a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026