Attitudes
Conditions
Brief summary
A comparison of how people respond to the terms natural immunity versus disease-induced immunity.
Interventions
OTHERdisease-induced immunity
Using a different label for natural immunity, specifically, disease-induced immunity
OTHERnatural immunity
Using standard label natural immunity
Sponsors
Laval University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Able to use a computer * Able to use the internet * Able to read and respond to questions in English or French * 18+ years old and living in Canada
Exclusion criteria
\- not meeting inclusion criteria
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion about forms of immunity | Immediately after intervention | Participants indicate their opinion in response to question, In your opinion, which is better: vaccine-induced immunity or natural/disease-induced immunity? on a visual analog scale (slider) from 0-100, with 0 = vaccine-induced immunity is much better, 50 = both forms of immunity are equally good, 100 = natural/disease-induced immunity is much better. |
Contacts
Primary ContactHolly Witteman
Outcome results
None listed