Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Psychological Stress
Conditions
Keywords
Adolescents, Health-related quality of life, Human immunodeficiency virus, Psychological distress, Promoting Resilience in Stress Management, Resilience
Brief summary
Adolescents living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (ALHIV) are at an increased risk of experiencing psychological distress and adverse mental health outcomes, particularly in low- to middle-income countries (LMICs). Although interventions aimed at promoting resilience have demonstrated potential in enhancing psychosocial outcomes among adolescents with chronic illnesses in high-income settings, there is a paucity of evidence from LMICs. This study protocol aims to outline a comprehensive framework for evaluating the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of the Promoting Resilience in Stress Management (PRISM) intervention in comparison to standard psychosocial care among ALHIV in a LMIC, such as Eswatini (formerly known as Swaziland). Additionally, it seeks to gather qualitative insights from both participants and PRISM coaches regarding the PRISM program. Exploratory outcomes under investigation are psychological distress, resilience, and HIV health-related quality of life. We hypothesise that: 1. Participants in the PRISM intervention group will experience reduced psychological distress compared to those in the control arm. 2. Participants in the PRISM intervention group will report improved HIV health-related quality of life after receiving the intervention compared to the control group. 3. Participants in the intervention arm will have higher resilience scores after receiving the intervention compared to those receiving usual psychosocial care.
Detailed description
This study employs an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design to rigorously evaluate the Promoting Resilience in Stress Management (PRISM) intervention. In the initial quantitative phase, a single-site, single-blind, pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted. A sample of (n=140) ALHIV will be recruited and randomly assigned to either the PRISM intervention arm or a control arm receiving standard psychosocial care. The PRISM intervention, a manualized, skills-based training program, originally comprises six 30-60-minute, one-on-one sessions designed to enhance resilience resources, including stress management, goal-setting, cognitive reframing, and meaning-making, in adolescents and young adults (AYAs). For the purposes of this trial, the PRISM intervention will be adapted to consist of three 60-minute sessions, delivered at intervals of 1-2 weeks based on participant preference. Participants in both arms will complete validated survey instruments to assess exploratory outcomes, including psychological distress, resilience, and HIV-related quality of life. Data collection will occur at baseline (T0), and at 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), and 12 months (T4) post-enrollment. The researchers will then evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of the PRISM intervention based on these outcomes. In the second phase of the study, an Exploratory-Descriptive Qualitative (EDQ) research design will be employed to investigate the experiences and perceptions of participants engaged in the PRISM program. Data collection will involve the use of semi-structured interview guides administered to nurse PRISM coaches and a purposively selected sample of ALHIV from the intervention arm of the pilot clinical trial. The collected data will undergo rigorous thematic analysis to elucidate key insights into the participants' experiences and perceptions of the PRISM intervention, thereby contributing to a deeper understanding of its implementation and impact.
Interventions
PRISM is a manualized, skills-based training program comprised of three 60-minute, one-on-one sessions designed to build resilience resources (stress management, goal-setting, cognitive-reframing, and meaning-making) in adolescents and young adults (AYAs). The sessions are scheduled every 1-2 weeks based on participant preference. In this study, the PRISM sessions will be facilitated by trained nurses who hold bachelor's degrees in Nursing Science with a specialisation in mental health.
Sponsors
Eswatini Nazarene Health Institutions
Baylor College of Medicine Children's Foundation
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
University of Eswatini
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Intervention model description
Single-site, single-blind, parallel randomized clinical trial
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
10 Years to 19 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
for the Clinical Trial: * Adolescents living with HIV aged 10-19 years. * Adolescents living with HIV who are cognitively able to participate in interviews (based on their medical history). * Adolescents living with HIV who will have a score \> 13 on the Kessler Screening Scale for Psychological Distress (K6).
Exclusion criteria
for the Clinical Trial: * Adolescents who refuse to participate. * Adolescents whose parents/caretakers (for \<18 years) will not consent to their participation. * Adolescents who will report having suicidal thoughts (i.e., who will respond yes to one item asking if they thought of killing themselves in the last 30days). This exclusion is based on the understanding that the PRISM intervention was not designed to address suicidal ideation, as confirmed by its developers. Such individuals will be referred to a licensed psychologist following the study's established referral plan, thereby ensuring they receive the appropriate care and support. Inclusion criteria for a support person: The PRISM intervention requires a caretaker or parent to be invited by the study participant to join the third session. • Parent or caretaker should be ≥ 18 years of age and consent to participation.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility of the PRISM intervention | 12 months outcome assessment point. | Feasibility of the PRISM intervention will be defined as priori \>70% program completion of the three PRISM sessions among enrolled participants. |
| Acceptability of the PRISM | 12 months outcome assessment point. | Acceptability of the PRISM intervention, which is a primary outcome, will be measured using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8), an 8-item measuring participant's opinions and assessments of the intervention. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale, where responses range from 1 (indicating dissatisfaction) to 4 (indicating high satisfaction). The total score, which ranges from 8 to 32, is derived by summing the responses to all eight items. A higher score on the CSQ-8 reflects greater satisfaction with the PRISM intervention. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Effectiveness of the PRISM intervention | At 12 months outcome assessment point. | Effectiveness of the PRISM intervention will be determined by comparing the changes in psychological distress, resilience and HIV health-related quality of life mean scores pre- and post-intervention for both the treatment and usual care groups of the trial. A statistically significant reduction in mean scores of the above-mentioned outcomes in the treatment group compared to the control group will suggest that the PRISM intervention is effective. |
| Psychological distress | At 3, 6, 9, and 12-months outcome assessment points. | Psychological distress will be assessed by the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6), a self-administered screening tool developed to screen for non-specific psychological distress and serious mental illness in various populations. Participants will be asked to rate how often they experienced symptoms in the past thirty days using the K6 questionnaire. They will rate their experiences on a 5-point Likert scale for each question, where 0 = none of the time, 1 = a little of the time, 2 = some of the time, 3 = most of the time, and 4 = all of the time. A total score of psychological distress will be computed by summing the scores for all six items. The K6 questionnaire has a total score ranging from 0 to 24 points, with higher scores indicating severe psychological distress. |
| Resilience | At 3, 6, 9, and 12-months outcome assessment points. | Resilience will be assessed with the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale 10-Item (CD-RISC 10). The CD-RISC 10 consists of 10 items, and respondents rate each item on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (not true at all) to 4 (true nearly all the time). The total score for the CD-RISC 10 ranges from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater resilience. |
| HIV health-related quality of life | At 3, 6, 9, and 12-months outcome assessment points. | The HIV health-related quality of life of adolescents living with HIV will be assessed using the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument-HIV (WHOQOL-HIV). Each item within the WHOQOL HIV BREF instrument is rated on a 5-point scale: 1 = not at all, 2 = a little, 3 = a moderate amount, 4 = very much, and 5 = an extreme amount. Participants in the study will score how they perceive the five domain items in the WHOQOL targeting HIV. An average score from each domain will be computed to have a total health quality of life for each participant. Then, higher scores reflect higher satisfaction or better functioning in these domains, suggesting a better overall quality of life. |
Countries
Eswatini
Contacts
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMusa L. Nhlabatsi, MSc
Eswatini Nazarene Health Institutions
STUDY_DIRECTORMduduzi C. Shongwe, PhD
Department of Midwifery Science, University of Eswatini
STUDY_DIRECTORDebrah Vambe, MD
Baylor College of Medicine Children's Foundation
STUDY_DIRECTORKay Alexander, MD
Baylor College of Medicine Children's Foundation
STUDY_DIRECTORNobuhle Mthethwa, MPH
Eswatini Ministry of Health (MOH)/Eswatini National Health AIDS
STUDY_DIRECTORJoyce Yi-Frazier, PhD
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI)
Outcome results
None listed