Skip to content

Aetiology and Pattern of 122 Patients With Mandibular Condylar Fracture

Aetiology and Pattern of Mandibular Condylar Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 122 Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07099833
Enrollment
122
Registered
2025-08-01
Start date
2018-01-01
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2025-08-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Facial Injuries, Mandibular Fractures

Keywords

Mandibular Condylar Fracture, Subcondylar Fracture, Craniofacial Trauma

Brief summary

This retrospective observational study aimed to investigate the aetiology and fracture patterns among patients with mandibular condylar fractures (MCF) who were treated at a trauma center in Shiraz, Iran, between 2018 and 2020. A total of 122 patients were included. The study involved collecting data on fracture characteristics, including anatomical location, classification (MacLennan and Loukota systems), angle of fracture lines, and the presence of concomitant maxillofacial injuries. The objective was to examine correlations between these characteristics and demographic or clinical factors such as age, sex, and mechanism of injury.

Detailed description

This is a retrospective cohort study conducted at a major trauma center affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Iran. The study enrolled patients diagnosed with unilateral or bilateral mandibular condylar fractures between January 2018 and December 2020. Data were extracted from clinical records and radiographic evaluations. Fractures were classified according to the MacLennan and Loukota systems, and relevant demographic and injury-related information was recorded. No interventions were administered as part of this registry. All procedures were conducted under approval from the institutional ethics committee. The primary aim was to investigate patterns in fracture characteristics and their associations with trauma mechanisms and patient demographics.

Interventions

OTHERAzita Sadeghzade

Azita Sadeghzade

Sponsors

Azita Sadeghzade
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients diagnosed with unilateral or bilateral mandibular condylar fracture * Trauma-related fracture confirmed by clinical and radiographic evaluation * Complete medical record and imaging data available * Age between 12 and 65 years at the time of trauma

Exclusion criteria

* History of prior mandibular condylar fracture * Incomplete medical or imaging records * Patients younger than 12 or older than 65 at time of injury

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Distribution of mandibular condylar fracture types (MacLennan classification)At initial evaluation (2018-2020)Frequency and percentage of fracture types (Class I-IV) based on MacLennan classification at initial clinical evaluation.
Anatomical location of mandibular condylar fracturesAt initial evaluation (2018-2020)Distribution of fracture sites: subcondylar, condylar neck, or condylar head based on CT scan classification (Loukota system).
Etiology of mandibular condylar fracturesAt initial evaluation (2018-2020)Proportion of fractures attributed to road traffic accident, falling, or assault based on patient report.

Countries

Iran

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026