Skip to content

Analysis of Hyperthermia as an Adjunctive Treatment to Evidence-based Clinical Intervention in Subjects With Bursitis: a Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial

Analysis of Hyperthermia as an Adjunctive Treatment to Evidence-based Clinical Intervention in Subjects With Bursitis: a Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07099573
Enrollment
120
Registered
2025-08-01
Start date
2025-08-01
Completion date
2026-04-30
Last updated
2025-08-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bursitis, Hyperthermia

Brief summary

This project aims to analyze the use of hyperthermia within a bursitis treatment protocol, as well as to determine the difference between two and three sessions per week. Study participants will be divided into four intervention groups: the first will receive two sessions per week for a period of six months, while the second will receive three sessions per week for the same period. The treatment protocol will consist of therapeutic physical exercise focused on the affected joint, stretching of the involved muscles, and the application of hyperthermia to the bursa and surrounding areas. The third and fourth intervention groups will receive the same treatment as mentioned above, but without hyperthermia. The third group will receive three sessions per week, while the second group will receive two sessions per week. Two different types of measurement variables will be used: on the one hand, the objective variable will be measurement and assessment of the bursa using ultrasound imaging. Subjective measurement variables will also be used through validated questionnaires, which will address physical activity, perceived functional limitations, and the visual analog scale for pain perception.

Interventions

RADIATIONHyperthermia

Hyperthermia will be applied for a period of 15 to 20 minutes in the area to be treated, maintaining a thermal sensation of gentle heat for the patient and accompanied by active-assisted or passive mobilization of the structures adjacent to the bursa.

OTHERPhysical Exercise

The therapeutic physical exercise will consist of 3 periods of isometric contraction of 30 seconds, with a rest period of 1 minute, varying the number of repetitions from 3 to 5 depending on the patient's symptoms.

OTHERStretching

Stretching of the involved muscles will involve 3 periods of maximum tolerable stretching without pain, lasting 20 seconds and resting for 30 seconds.

Sponsors

University of Malaga
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Have a diagnosis confirmed by performing an imaging test of Bursitis * Have not yet received physiotherapy treatment.

Exclusion criteria

* Have undergone surgery. * Those who refuse to participate in this study. * Patients with muscle atrophy. * Medical conditions that are contraindications for hyperthermia therapy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
DISABILITIES OF THE ARM, SHOULDER AND HAND QUESTIONNAIRE (DASH)Baseline and up to one yearIt consists of a self-administered questionnaire that assesses the upper limb as a functional unit and allows for the quantification and comparison of the impact of different processes affecting different regions of the limb. It consists of a core of 30 items and two optional modules, each with four items. Each item is scored from 1 to 5, with higher scores corresponding to greater symptom intensity. The final score can range from 30 to 150 points, with a scale of 0 (best possible score) to 100 (worst possible score). The optional modules are scored separately. The Spanish version has very high reliability (r=0.96).
LOWER EXTREMITY FUNCTIONAL SCALE (LEFS)This questionnaire assesses perceived functionality in patients with a musculoskeletal problem in the lower limb. It consists of 20 questions, each of which is scored by the patient, ranging from 0 (extreme difficulty or inability to perform the activity
International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)Baseline and up to one yearThis instrument is designed to measure physical activity levels in an adult population and can serve as a reference for making recommendations regarding physical activity. It comes in two versions: the long version with 31 items (IPAQ-LF) and the short version with 9 items (IPAQ-SF). The short version, which will be used in this study as recommended by the authors, measures activity at four intensity levels, ranging from 1 (vigorous-intensity activity) to 4 (sedentary). It has very good reliability (r=0.8).
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Baseline and up to one yearIt consists of an 11-point numerical scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain intensity), which serves as a quantification for measuring pain intensity. It has moderate to good reliability.
UltrasonographyBaseline and up to one yearUltrasound imaging techniques allow visualization of the bursa area, as the ultrasound beam can penetrate this region. These images enable detailed, multidimensional visualization of the joints and adjacent structures. They also allow precise differentiation of different tissue types, such as soft tissue, bone, or fluids. This is a noninvasive test; it involves placing the transducer on the skin surface, perpendicular to the anatomical location of the bursa.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026