Skip to content

Buteyko vs Diaphragmatic Breathing Technique Among the Adolescents

Efficacy of Buteyko vs Diaphragmatic Breathing Technique Among the Adolescents With Mouth Breathing Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07097467
Enrollment
64
Registered
2025-07-31
Start date
2024-10-01
Completion date
2025-06-14
Last updated
2025-07-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mouth Breathing Syndrome

Keywords

Breathing techniques, Buteyko vs diaphragmatic

Brief summary

This study is about Mouth breathing adolescents. This study is a comparative study between buteyko and diaphragmatic breathing technique to check that which technique is more suitable for mouth breathing children.

Detailed description

The substitution of mouth breathing for nasal breathing or mixed breathing where nose is supplemented by mouth is characterized as mouth breathing syndrome. Mouth breathing results in many facial, occlusal, postural and functional changes. It also has the adverse effect on the memory of young children. Other than that bad breath, sleeping issues are also the major manifestation of mouth breathing syndrome. The buteyko breathing technique has been known to establish the mouth breathing in asthmatic patients and improve their quality of life. This study is to compare the efficacy of both technique among the adolescents with mouth breathing syndrome.

Interventions

The buteyko breathing technique is a breath holding technique mostly used in Asthma patients

Sponsors

Dr. Kashish Sahota
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 16 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Mouth Breathing Adolescents, Consented by parents or legal guardians to participate in the study, Mouth breathing syndrome conformed by physician, Positive glatzel mirror test and water test

Exclusion criteria

Chronic Respiratory conditions, Neurological conditions, Orthopaedic conditions, Heart diseases, Children undergone tonsillectomy or adenoidectomy, Auditory or visual impairment Body Mass index above 95th percentile

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Glatzel Mirror Test4 weeksA two way mirror is used in this procedure. It is used to determine whether nasal breathing is established or not
Water test4 weeksPerson has to hold the water in mouth for 3 minutes with water closed. It is also used to confirm the mouth breathing

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of life ( Mouth Breathing Quality of Life)4 weeksMouth Breathing Quality of Life Questionnaire (MBQol) used to check quality if life in mouth breathing children and adolescents.

Countries

India

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026