Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Urtica Dioica Cataplasm in the Management of Osgood-Schlatter Disease in Young Athletes

Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Urtica Dioica Cataplasm in the Management of Osgood-Schlatter Disease in Young Athletes: A Study Protocol for Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07096037
Enrollment
90
Registered
2025-07-31
Start date
2025-09-01
Completion date
2026-09-30
Last updated
2025-08-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osgood-Schlatter Disease

Keywords

Urtica dioica, Osgood-Schlatter disease, KOOS-Child, Visual Analogue Scale

Brief summary

The primary objective of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a topical Urtica dioica cataplasm in managing knee pain and functional limitations in athletic children diagnosed with Osgood-Schlatter Disease. Efficacy will be assessed through changes in knee pain using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and functional outcomes using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Three groups will be tested: * UDC Group: topical application of Urtica dioica cataplasm * Standard Care Group: oral vitamin D supplementation and physical rest * Placebo Group: topical application of a placebo cataplasm using Beta vulgaris subsp. cicla

Interventions

OTHERUrtica dioica cataplasm

Participants will receive a warm Urtica dioica cataplasm applied topically on the affected knee, once daily for 60 minutes, three times per week (on alternate days) over a 6-week period.

OTHERPlacebo

Participants will receive a placebo cataplasm, matched in texture, color, and odor to the active treatment. The placebo is inert and safe for pediatric topical use.

DRUGVitamin D

Participants will receive oral vitamin D.

Reduction in physical activity based on orthopedic advice.

Sponsors

Faculty of Medicine, Sousse
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
7 Years to 15 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy male children between 7 and 15 years of age * Active in regular sports practice (e.g., football) * Clinically confirmed diagnosis of OSD

Exclusion criteria

* Known allergy to Urtica dioica * Presence of dermatological conditions or lesions on the knees * Recent use of anti-inflammatory medications * History of immune or chronic inflammatory diseases * Diagnosis of any other bone disorder

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain intensityAt each clinical visit during the intervention period (three times a week during 6 weeks).measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a 10-cm line anchored by no pain (0) and worst imaginable pain (10). VAS scores will be recorded at each clinical visit during the intervention period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional knee statusAssessments will be done at baseline and after 6 weeks.assessed using the KOOS-Child questionnaire, covering five subscales (pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, sport/recreation function, and knee-related quality of life). Scores range from 0 (extreme dysfunction) to 100 (no symptoms).
Return to sport6 weeksdefined as the number of days post-treatment needed to resume regular athletic activity.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse eventsAt each follow-up visit during 6 weeksAdverse events (skin reactions, discomfort, or other clinical complaints) will be recorded systematically.

Contacts

Primary ContactAmira Zairi, Pr.
zairi_amira@yahoo.fr+21698424285
Backup ContactHana Nasrallah, PhD
hananasrallah.hn@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026